This paper is a critical analysis of the use of ontology as an instrument to specify the semantics of a document. The paper argue that not only is a logic of the type used in ontology insufficient for such a purpose, but that the very idea that meaning is a property of a document that can be expressed and stored independently of the interpretation activity is misguided.

The paper proposes, in very general lines, a possible alternative view of meaning as modification of context and shows that many current approaches to meaning, from ontology to emergent semantics, can be seen as spacial cases of this approach, and can be analyzed from a very general theoretical framework.


Logic System Description Logic Order Logic Discursive Practice Formal Grammar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American 284 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. Eagleton, T.: Literary theory, an introduction. Minnesota University Press, Minneapolis (1996)Google Scholar
  3. Eco, U.: The role of the reader. University of Indiana Press, Bloomington (1979)Google Scholar
  4. Feynman, R.: What do you care what other people think? Norton, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  5. Gadamer, H.-G.: Truth and method, London (1975)Google Scholar
  6. Geckeler, H.: Semántica estructural y teoría del campo léxico. In: Hernández, M.M. (ed.) Spanish translation of Strukturelle Semantik und Wortfeldtheorie, Gredos, Madrid (1976)Google Scholar
  7. Greimas, A.J.: Sémantique structurale. larousse, Paris (1966)Google Scholar
  8. Hakimpour, F., Geppert, A.: Resolving semantic heterogeneity in schema integration: An ontology based approach. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontologies in Information systems (2001)Google Scholar
  9. Jameson, F.: The prison-house of language. Princeton, NJ (1972)Google Scholar
  10. Lacan, J.: Escrits: A selection. Norton, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  11. Moya, V.: La selva de la traducción. Cátedra, Madrid (2004)Google Scholar
  12. Nida, E.: Towards a science of translating. E.J. Brill, Leiden (1964)Google Scholar
  13. Santini, S., Gupta, A., Jain, R.: Emergent semantics through interaction in image databases. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2001)Google Scholar
  14. Santini, S., Jain, R.: Beyond query by example. In: Proceedings of ACM multimedia (1998)Google Scholar
  15. Santini, S., Jain, R.: The ”el niño” image database system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, pp. 524–529 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. Scherp, A., Jain, R.: Towards an ecosystem for semantics. In: Proceedings of ACM Multimedia systems (2007)Google Scholar
  17. Stich, S.: From folk psychology to cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1983)Google Scholar
  18. Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge engineering review 11(2) (1996)Google Scholar
  19. Vermeer, H.J.: Ein rahmen eür eine allgemeine translatontheorie. Aufsätze zur Translationtheorie, 48–61 (1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Santini
    • 1
  1. 1.Escuela Politécnica SuperiorUniversidad Autónoma de MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations