Skip to main content

Word Similarity In WordNet

  • Conference paper

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to measure the semantic similarity between concepts. By exploiting advantages of distance (edge-base) approach for taxonomic tree-like concepts, we enhance the strength of information theoretic (node-based) approach. Our measure therefore gives a complete view of word similarity, which cannot be achieved by solely applying node-based approach. Our experimental measure achieves 88% correlation with human rating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. J. Jiang and D. W. Conrath. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In the International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Li, Z. A. Bandar, and D. McLean. An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. In IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Transaction, vol. 15, 871–882, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. Lin. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In ICML ’98: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 296–304, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1998. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Miller and W. Charles. Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(1):1–28, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. A. Miller. Nouns in wordnet: A lexical inheritance system. International journal of Lexicography, 3(4):245–264, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. A. Miller, C. Fellbaum, R. Beckwith, D. Gross, and K. Miller. Introduction to wordnet: An online lexical database. International journal of Lexicography, 3(4):235–244, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Resnik. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In IJCAI, 448–453, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Richardson and A. F. Smeaton. Using WordNet in a knowledge-based approach to information retrieval. Technical Report CA-0395, Dublin, Ireland, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. N. Shepard. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. 237(4820):1317–1323, September 1987.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Roy, H. Mili, E. Bicknell, and M. Blettner. Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, volume 19, 17–30, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Sussna. Word sense disambiguation for free-text indexing using a massive semantic network. In CIKM ’93: Proceedings of the second international conference on Information and knowledge management, 67–74, New York, NY, USA, 1993. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. Gale, K. Church, and D. Yarovsky. A method for disambiguating word senses in a large corpus. Common Methodologies in Humanities Computing and Computational Linguistics, 26:415–439, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hong-Minh, T., Smith, D. (2008). Word Similarity In WordNet. In: Bock, H.G., Kostina, E., Phu, H.X., Rannacher, R. (eds) Modeling, Simulation and Optimization of Complex Processes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79409-7_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics