Skip to main content

Expected Vs. Observed Storage Usage: Limits to Intertemporal Arbitrage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 881 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Backwardation refers to a situation in which a commodity's future price for future delivery is below the price for immediate delivery.

  2. 2.

    This section draws on previous work where we compare storage operation in the UK and Germany (Neumann and Zachmann, 2008). The basic idea is that a competitive market such as the UK will use natural gas storage according to the theory of storage.

  3. 3.

    In an application to the UK market Hobæk et al. (2008) find a non-linear effect of storage on the relation of spot and futures prices.

References

  • Boogert, A., and de Jong, C. (2006) Gas storage valuation using a Monte Carlo method, BWPEF 0704, December 2006, Birkbeck, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaton, C., Cretì, A., and Villeneuve, B. (in press). Some economics of seasonal gas storage. Energy Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A., and Laroque, G. (1996). Competitive storage and commodity price dynamics.Journal of Political Economy, 104(5), 896–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dencerler, C., Khokher, Z., and Simin, T. (2005). An empirical analysis of commodity convenience yields. Working Paper, June 2005, University of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIA (2004). The basics of underground Natural Gas Storage, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F., and French, K. R. (1987) Commodity futures prices: Some evidence on forecast power, premiums and the theory of storage.Journal of Business, 60(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gas Storage Europe (2008a). GSE available capacities. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gas Storage Europe (2008b). GSE storage investment database. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewe, J. (2005). Auswirkungen der Liberalisierung auf die Erdgasspeicherung – Eine ökonomische Analyse für den deutschen Erdgasmarkt, Sonderpunkt Verlag Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobæk, H., Lindqvist, O., and Løland, .A (2008). Risk premium in the UK natural gas forward market.Energy Economics, 30(5), 2420–2440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S., Khokher, Z., and Simin, T. (2005). Inventories, convenience yields and mean reversion. Working Paper, October 2005, University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff, F. A., and Schwartz, E. S. (2001). Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach.Review of Financial Studies, 14(1), 113–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlacek, R. (2007). Untertage-Gasspeicherung in Deutschland, Landesamt für Bergbau, Energie und Geologie, Hannover, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serletis, A., and Shahmoradi, A. (2006). Futures trading and the storage of North American natural gas. OPEC Review, 30(1), 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons and Company International Energy Industry Research (2000). Underground Natural Gas Storage. Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susmel, R., and Thompson, A. (1997). Volatility, storage and convenience: Evidence from natural gas markets.The Journal of Futures Markets, 17(1), 17–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uria, R., and Williams, J. (2007). The Supply-of-Storage for natural gas in California.The Energy Journal, 28(3), 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, S. Z. C., and Zhen, Z. (2006). Commodity convenience yield and risk premium determination: The case of the US natural gas market.Energy Economics, 28(4), 523–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. C., and Wright, B. D. (1991). Storage and commodity markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., and Williams, J. C. (1982). The economic role of commodity storage.The Economic Journal, 92(367), 596–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. D., and Williams, J. C. (1989). A theory of negative prices for storage.Journal of Futures Markets, 9(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Neumann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neumann, A., Zachmann, G. (2009). Expected Vs. Observed Storage Usage: Limits to Intertemporal Arbitrage. In: Cretì, A. (eds) The Economics of Natural Gas Storage. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79407-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79407-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79406-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79407-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics