Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thailand's and Malaysia's Cross-Regional FTA Initiatives

  • Chapter
Cross Regional Trade Agreements

Part of the book series: The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific ((PEAP))

This chapter explores recent free trade agreement (FTA) initiatives by Thailand and Malaysia. It is shaped with reference to the concept of cross-regional trade agreements (CRTAs) developed by Mireya Solis and Saori Katada in the framework chapter of this book. It notes that each government, while remaining committed to the regional trade liberalization processes manifest in the APEC, the ASEAN AFTA, and the ASEAN plus Three (ATP) talks, has recently begun bilateral free trade negotiations. And each has reached beyond the Asian region to find negotiating partners. Their declared motive for going cross-regional was expectation of economic gain. This is evident in their efforts to secure access to the American, South Asian, Middle Eastern, and Australian markets and to attract investment from these economies. But this rationale must be qualified because the markets and investment sources of many Asian governments’ extra-regional partners are relatively small in Asian terms, and their trade and investment barriers are already amongst the lowest in the world. This is especially true of New Zealand and Chile, which are popular extra-regional partners for Asian governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mireya Solis and Saori Katada’s chapter “Permeated Regionalism in East Asia: Cross-Regional Trade agreements in Theory and Practice”, in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vinod K. Aggarwal and Shujiro Urata, eds., Bilateral Trade Arrangements in the Asia-Pacific: Origins, Evolution, and Implications, (New York, NY: Routledge, 2006); Christopher Dent, New Free Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific (Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006); Jiro Okamoto, ed., Whither Free Trade Agreements? Proliferation, Evaluation, and Multilateralization (Tokyo: Institute of Developing Economies, 2003); ASEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 1 (April 2005), special issue on Southeast Asian FTAs, especially the overview by Sally and Sen pp. 92–116. Also see Ramkishen Rajan and Rahul Sen, “The New Wave of FTAs in Asia: Implications for ASEAN, China and India”, Asian Economic Cooperation and Integration, (Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2005), pp. 123–160.

    Google Scholar 

  3. This point is underscored by an anonymous reviewer who asserts that Singapore exerts an influence that few Asian leaders care to admit to in public.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stephen Hoadley, Negotiating Free Trade: The New Zealand-Singapore CEP Agreement (Wellington: New Zealand Institute of International Affairs, 2002), pp. 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The most comprehensive work on Singapore FTAs is Rahul Sen, Free Trade Agreements in Southeast Asia (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2004). Also see Margaret Liang, “Singapore’s Trade Policies: Priorities and Options”, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 1 (April 2005), pp. 49–60; Seungjoo Lee, “Singapore’s Trade Bilateralism: A Two-Track Strategy”, in Aggarwal and Urata, eds., Bilateral Trade Arrangements in the Asia-Pacific, pp. 184–205; Koh and Chang Li Lin, eds., The United States Singapore Free Trade Agreement Highlights and Insights; Also see Michael Leifer, Singapore’s Foreign Policy: Coping with Vulnerability (New York, NY: Routledge, 2000) and N. Ganesan, Realism and Interdependence in Singapore’s Foreign Policy (New York: Routledge, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ramkishen S. Rajan, Rahul Sen and Reza Y. Siregar “Singapore and the New Regionalism: Bilateral Trade Linkages with Japan and the US”, The World Economy 26, 9 (2003), pp. 1325–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. http://app.fta.gov.sg/asp/fta/ftapage.asp?id=8 accessed 25 September 2006.

  8. Tommy T. B. Koh, “The USSFTA: A Personal Perspective” in Tommy B. Koh and Chang Li Lin, eds., The United States Singapore Free Trade Agreement Highlights and Insights (Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies, 2004), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fumio Nagai, “Thailand’s FTA Policy: Continuity and Change between the Chuan and Thaksin Governments”, in Okamoto, ed., Whither Free Trade Agreements? p. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Its members are Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, hence the acronym BIMST with EC, Economic Cooperation, added. It is sometimes called the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation, which also fits the acronym.

    Google Scholar 

  11. European Free Trade Association, whose members currently are Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  12. MERCOSUR or Common Market of the South includes Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fumio Nagai, “Thailand’s FTA Policy: From ‘Dual Track’ Policy to ‘New Asian’ Policy”, in Siriporn Wajjwalku, ed., Japan-ASEAN Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Asian Perspectives (Bangkok: Thammasat University Press for the Thammasat University Institute of East Asian Studies and the Japan Foundation, 2004), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michael J. G. Parnwell, ed., Uneven Development in Thailand (Aldershot: Avebury, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Andrew MacIntyre, Business-Government Relations in Industrializing East Asia: South Korea and Thailand (Nathan: Griffith University Centre for the Study of Australia-Asia Relations, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robert J. Muscat, The Fifth Tiger: A Study of Thai Development Policy (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 1994) and Anek Laothamatas, Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand: From Bureaucratic Polity to Liberal Corporatism (Boulder: Westview Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pasuk Phongpaichit and Chris Baker, Thailand’s Boom and Bust (Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. On the characteristics of the economy at present see the Thailand country chapter in World Bank, “Countries and Regions”. Webpage at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/0, pagePK:180619.theSitePK:136917, 00.html accessed 5 September 2005.

  19. Peter Warr, ed., Thailand Beyond the Crisis (Abingdon: Routledge Curzon, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nagai, “Thailand’s FTA Policy”; Fumio Nagai, Thailand’s Trade Policy: WTO Plus FTA? APEC Study Centre Working Paper Series 01/02–No. 6 (Minahama: Institute of Developing Economies, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nagai, Thailand’s Trade Policy, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nagai, Thailand’s FTA Policy, p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Australia New Zealand Closer Economic Relationship and Trade Agreement (ANZCERTA or more commonly CER), in operation since 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  24. CEFTA, whose members comprised Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary and Bulgaria.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nagai, “Thailand’s FTA Policy”, p. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Chris Baker, “Pluto-populism: Thaksin and Popular Politics”, in Warr, ed., Thailand Beyond the Crisis.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pawin Talerngsri and Pimchanok Vonkhorpom, “Trade Policy in Thailand: Pursuing a Dual Track Approach”, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 1 (April 2005), pp. 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nagai, “Thailand’s FTA Policy” (2004), p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Connors, “Thailand”.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nagai, “Thailand’s FTA Policy”, p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nagai, “Thailand’s FTA Policy”, p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Suthiphand Chirathivat and Sothitorn Mallikamas, “Thailand’s FTA Strategy: Current Developments and Future Challenges”, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 21, no. 1 (April 2004), pp. 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  33. At the July 2007 APEC meeting the leaders did not agree to pursue a regional free trade agreement.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nagai, cited above Clark Neher, “Burma”, in Patrick Heenan and Monique Lamontagne, eds., The Southeast Asia Handbook (London: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 2001), pp. 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Phongpaichit and Baker, Thailand’s Boom and Bust, pp. 67–72; Phongpaichit and Baker (2002), cited above, pp. 162–167.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Christopher M. Dent, “Networking the Region? The Emergence and Impact of Asia-Pacific Bilateral Free Trade Agreement Projects”, The Pacific Review, vol. 16, no. 1 (2003), pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thaksin’s keynote policy has been called the “Dual Track” policy or Tahksinomics, but this is little more that a label for a rhetorical balancing of external economic liberalization on the one hand and a collection of domestic economic relief initiatives, such as aid to villages, on the other. Chris Baker labels this “pluto-populism”. See Chris Baker, “Pluto-populism: Thaksin and Popular Politics”.

    Google Scholar 

  38. International Trade Center, “Comparison of Thailand’s Export Statistics”, found at http://www.intracen.org, accessed February 8, 2006.

  39. Chirathivat and Mallikamas, “Thailand’s FTA Strategy”, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nagai, “Thailand’s FTA Policy”, p. 258.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Speech by Prime Minister Dr. Thaksin Shinawatra, “Forward Engagement: The New Era of Thailand’s Foreign Policy”. Delivered at the Inaugural Lecture of the Saranrom Institute for International Affairs, March 12, 2003, Bangkok, Thailand. Available at: http://www.thaiembdc.org/pressctr/statemnt/pm/sifa031203.html (accessed on March 20, 2006).

  42. Jirayu Tulyanond, “Thailand’s Trade Policy: Progress and Purpose” [n.d. 2004?] At http://www.thailandoutlook.com accessed 25 August 2005.

  43. Chirathivat and Mallikamas, “Thailand’s FTA Strategy”, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Thaksin, “Forward Engagement.…”, cited above.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nagai, Thailand’s Trade Policy, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Talerngsri and Vonkhorpom, “Trade Policy in Thailand”.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Trade Policy Review: Thailand 2003 (Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2003), at para 133 of “Report by the Government” accessed at http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/g123_e.doc accessed 24 November 2005.

  48. Thailand, Department of Trade Negotiations, “FTA Potential Benefits and Costs”, available at http://www.thaifta.com/english, accessed 17 July 2007.

  49. Razeen Sally, “Analysis/Thailand’s Trade Policy. Too Many Free Trade Agreements, Far Too Little Domestic Reform”, ISEAS Viewpoints (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 21 September 2005) Found at http://www.iseas.edu.sg/viewpoint/rs21sep05.pdf accessed 24 November 2005.

  50. Sally, “Analysis/Thailand’s Trade Policy”.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Chirathivat and Mallikamas, “Thailand’s FTA Strategy”, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sally, “Analysis/Thailand’s Trade Policy”.

    Google Scholar 

  53. “The importance of the FTA to Thailand”. Available at http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=2826 (accessed on March 17, 2006).

  54. Aziz Chaudry, “Fighting the US-Thailand Free Trade Agreement”, Scoop Independent News, Online: http://www.scoop.co.nz (accessed on 10 June 2006); Woranuj Maneerungsee, “Trade Pacts May Lead to Legal Changes: NGOs Oppose Threat to Thai Sovereignty”, Bangkok Post, 25 January 2005); Rebecca Buckman, “Next U.S. Deal? Try Thailand”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 28 August 2003), pp. 18–19; Shawn W. Chrispin and Murray Hiebert, “Thais Punt on Trade Talks”, Far Eastern Economic Review, 4 March 2004, pp. 16–18.

  55. The FTA Watch homepage is found at http://www.ftawatch.org/en/, accessed on 17 July 2007. See a report on the NGO Network for Political and Social Reform in The Nation, 24 September 2006, at http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=6015, accessed 17 July 2007.

  56. The Thai Human Rights Commission issued a critical impact assessment. See Sanya Smith, “Thai Human Rights Commission attacks FTA with US”, North–South Development Monitor, Issue 6176, 25 January 2007, found at http://www.bilaterals.org, accessed 17 July 2007. Pawin Talerngsri, director for Agriculture and Environment at the Department of Trade Negotiations, reported that FTAs hurt small farmers and recommended government intervention. The Nation (Bangkok), 7 May 2007, found at http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=8159 accessed 17 July 2007.

  57. James Hookway, “Thailand Delays Free-Trade Moves: U.S. Talks, Japan Pact Put on Hold as Turmoil Deals Blow to Thaksin’s Agenda”, The Wall Street Journal Online, March 3 2006, Online: http://www.wsj.com, accessed on 4 June 2006; “Thailand Suspends US Free Trade Talks Due to Poll”. Available at http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=3973, accessed on 17 March 2006.

  58. “Fine-tooth Comb Needed for Clauses” The Nation (Bangkok, 16 August 2007), accessed at www.bilaterals.org on 5 September 2007.

  59. “Thai–Indian FTA ‘in six weeks” Bloomberg News citing comment by Commerce Minister Krirk-krai Jirapaet as reported in Bangkok Post (12 June 2007), found at www.bilaterals.org on 5 September 2007.

  60. Chirathivat and Mallikamas, “Thailand’s FTA Strategy”, p. 42. Also Tulyanond, “Thailand’s Trade Policy”, and Sally, “Analysis/Thailand’s Trade Policy”. offer similar critiques.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Nagai, “Thailand’s Trade Policy”, p. 276; Nagai, “Thailand’s Trade Policy” (2004) p. 131; Sally, “Analysis/Thailand’s Trade Policy”.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sally, “Analysis/Thailand’s Trade Policy”.

    Google Scholar 

  63. New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, “National Interest Analysis: New Zealand-Thailand Closer Economic Partnership Agreement” Wellington, March 2005, accessed at http://www.mfat.govt.nz/tradeagreements/thainzcep/nia/thainiaindex.html on 8 February 2006.

  64. Fiona Yap, “Malaysia”, in Patrick Heenan and Monique Lamontagne, eds., The Southeast Asia Handbook (London: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, 2001), pp. 64–65; Edmund Gomez and Kwanme Jomo, Malaysia’s Political Economy: Politics, Patronage, and Profits (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Helen Nesaduri, “In Defense of National Economic Autonomy? Malaysia’s Response to the Financial Crisis”. The Pacific Review, vol. 13, no. 1 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Prime Minister Mahathir was reported by the Bangkok Post on 27 February 2001 as expressing suspicion that Singapore’s FTAs would evade the AFTA rules of origin: “We have to watch this very carefully because this can be a backdoor entry into AFTA”. And Trade Minister Rafidah Aziz was reported by The Nation on 6 July 2002 as having said: “In the case of free trade agreements where you bargain on tariff concessions…then it is going against AFTA rules and cannot be done”. See Nagai, Thailand’s Trade Policy, p. 1. In response to Singapore’s FTA with New Zealand, Malaysia’s foreign minister in 2000 said, “When we do something outside the ASEAN context which could weaken the organization, we must think twice”. See Suzuki, “Linkage between Malaysia’s FTA Policy and ASEAN Diplomacy”, p. 298.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Prema-chandra Athukorala, “Trade Policy in Malaysia: Liberalization Process, Structure of Protection, and Reform Agenda” ASEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 1 (April 2005), pp. 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Suzuki, “Linkage between Malaysia’s FTA Policy and ASEAN Diplomacy”, p. 305.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Yumiko Okamoto, “The Reluctant Bilateralist: Malaysia’s New Trade Strategy”, in Aggarwal and Urata, eds., Bilateral Trade Arrangements in the Asia-Pacific, pp. 232–252.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Datuk Seri Rafidah Aziz, “Malaysia and Free Trade Agreements”. Speech by Minister of International Trade and Industry of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 27 January 2005. Found at http://www.miti.gov.my/speech-27jan05.html accessed on 5 September 2005.

  71. Malaysia agreed on 31 March 2005 to begin FTA talks with New Zealand and on 6 April 2005 to begin talks with Australia. All parties hoped to complete the talks by mid-2006 but disagreements surfaced, progress stalled, and talks were virtually suspended throughout the early part of 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Bernama, “MITI Invites Inputs for FTA Negotiations” (Kuala Lumpur: Bernama News Agency, 29 August 2005). Found at http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_business.php?id=152727 accessed 7 September 2005.

  73. Jackson Sawatan, “Rafidah Says Japan-M’sia FTA May Be Signed In December (Kuala Lumpur: Bernama News Agency, 29 August 2005). Found at http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_business.php?id=152799. The agreement came into force in the summer of 2006.

  74. Figures derived from data presented by Asian Development Bank Asia Regional Integration Center, accessed at http://www.aric.adb.org/FTAbyCountryAll.php on 5 September 2007.

  75. Edmund Terence Gomez and Jomo K. S., Malaysia’s Political Economy: Politics, Patronage and Profits (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Since 1958 Malaysia has signed 65 bilateral trade agreements, 6 of them with ASEAN countries, 4 with East Asian countries, 3 with South Asian countries, and 52 with other countries throughout the world. Malaysia has signed economic cooperation agreements of various sorts, for example on investment guarantees, double taxation, payments, and air services, with a total of 136 countries, only 23 of which are in Asia. This record strongly qualifies any judgment that Malaysia is a parochial trader. See Malaysia, “List of Agreements Between Malaysia and Foreign Countries” (Kuala Lumpur, Ministry of International Trade and Industry, 2005), webpage accessed on 5 September 2005 at http://www.miti.gov.my/trd-bilateral.html.

  77. Suzuki, “Linkage between Malaysia’s FTA Policy and ASEAN Diplomacy”, p. 305.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Mark Rolls, “Growing apart, New Zealand and Malaysia” in Anthony Smith, ed., Southeast Asia and New Zealand: a History of Regional and Bilateral Relations (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Malaysia, “Malaysia and Free Trade Agreements, ” (Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of International Trade and Industry, 2005), webpage accessed on 7 September 2005 at http://www.miti.gov.my.

  80. Athukorala, “Trade Policy in Malaysia”.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Hoadley, Negotiating Free Trade, pp. 65–66.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Christopher Dent, “Bilateral Free Trade Agreements: Boon or Bane for Regional Co-operation in East Asia”, European Journal of East Asian Studies, vol. 4, no. 2 (December 2005), pp 287–314 and “The New Economic Bilateralism in Southeast Asia: Region-Convergent or Region-Divergent?” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, vol. 6, no. 1 (2006), pp 81–111, and “The International Political Economy of ASEAN Economic Integration and Bilateral FTAs”, Sudostasien Aktuell (Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs), Institute of Asian Studies, Hamburg, Issue 1, 2007, pp. 16–51. For his book-length treatment of this important theme see Dent, New Free Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Auckland, New Zealand

    S. Hoadley

Authors
  1. S. Hoadley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern California, 3518 Trousdale Parkway, 90089, Los Angelos, CA, USA

    Saori N. Katada

  2. American University, 4400 Massachussetts Ave, Washington, DC, USA

    Mireya Solís

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoadley, S. (2008). Thailand's and Malaysia's Cross-Regional FTA Initiatives. In: Katada, S.N., Solís, M. (eds) Cross Regional Trade Agreements. The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79327-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation