Skip to main content

Singleton Acyclic Mechanisms and Their Applications to Scheduling Problems

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4997))

Abstract

Mehta, Roughgarden, and Sundararajan recently introduced a new class of cost sharing mechanisms called acyclic mechanisms. These mechanisms achieve a slightly weaker notion of truthfulness than the well-known Moulin mechanisms, but provide additional freedom to improve budget balance and social cost approximation guarantees. In this paper, we investigate the potential of acyclic mechanisms for combinatorial optimization problems. In particular, we study a subclass of acyclic mechanisms which we term singleton acyclic mechanisms. We show that every ρ-approximate algorithm that is partially increasing can be turned into a singleton acyclic mechanism that is weakly group-strategyproof and ρ-budget balanced. Based on this result, we develop singleton acyclic mechanisms for parallel machine scheduling problems with completion time objectives, which perform extremely well both with respect to budget balance and social cost.

This work was supported by the DFG Research Center Matheon “Mathematics for key technologies”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bleischwitz, Y., Monien, B.: Fair cost-sharing methods for scheduling jobs on parallel machines. In: Calamoneri, T., Finocchi, I., Italiano, G.F. (eds.) CIAC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3998, pp. 175–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Brenner, J., Schäfer, G.: Cost sharing methods for makespan and completion time scheduling. In: Thomas, W., Weil, P. (eds.) STACS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4393, pp. 670–681. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brucker, P.: Scheduling Algorithms. Springer, New York, USA (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Chawla, S., Roughgarden, T., Sundararajan, M.: Optimal cost-sharing mechanisms for Steiner forest problems. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Workshop on Internet and Network Economics, pp. 112–123 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Devanur, N., Mihail, M., Vazirani, V.: Strategyproof cost-sharing mechanisms for set cover and facility location games. In: Proc. of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Du, J., Leung, J.Y.T., Young, G.H.: Minimizing mean flow time with release time constraint. Theoretical Computer Science 75(3), 347–355 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Engels, D., Karger, D., Kolliopoulos, S., Sengupta, S., Uma, R., Wein, J.: Techniques for scheduling with rejection. Journal of Algorithms 49, 175–191 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Graham, R.L.: Bounds on multiprocessing timing anomalies. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 17(2), 416–429 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, A., Könemann, J., Leonardi, S., Ravi, R., Schäfer, G.: An efficient cost-sharing mechanism for the prize-collecting Steiner forest problem. In: Proc. of the 18th ACM-SIAM Sympos. on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1153–1162 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Immorlica, N., Mahdian, M., Mirrokni, V.S.: Limitations of cross-monotonic cost sharing schemes. In: Proc. of the 16th ACM-SIAM Sympos. on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 602–611 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kawaguchi, T., Kyan, S.: Worst case bound of an LRF schedule for the mean weighted flow time problem. SIAM Journal on Computing 15(4), 1119–1129 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Könemann, J., Leonardi, S., Schäfer, G.: A group-strategyproof mechanism for Steiner forests. In: Proc. of the 16th ACM-SIAM Sympos. on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 612–619 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Könemann, J., Leonardi, S., Schäfer, G., van Zwam, S.: From primal-dual to cost shares and back: a stronger LP relaxation for the Steiner forest problem. In: Caires, L., Italiano, G.F., Monteiro, L., Palamidessi, C., Yung, M. (eds.) ICALP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3580, pp. 930–942. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehta, A., Roughgarden, T., Sundararajan, M.: Beyond Moulin mechanisms. In: Proc. of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moulin, H.: Incremental cost sharing: Characterization by coalition strategy-proofness. Social Choice and Welfare 16, 279–320 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips, C., Stein, C., Wein, J.: Minimizing average completion time in the presence of release dates. Math. Program 82, 199–223 (1998)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Roughgarden, T., Sundararajan, M.: New trade-offs in cost-sharing mechanisms. In: Proc. of the 38th ACM Sympos. on Theory of Computing, pp. 79–88 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roughgarden, T., Sundararajan, M.: Optimal efficiency guarantees for network design mechanisms. In: Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, pp. 469–483 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schrage, L.: A proof of the optimality of the shortest remaining processing time discipline. Operations Research 16, 687–690 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, W.: Various optimizers for single-stage production. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 3, 59–66 (1956)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brenner, J., Schäfer, G. (2008). Singleton Acyclic Mechanisms and Their Applications to Scheduling Problems. In: Monien, B., Schroeder, UP. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4997. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79309-0_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79309-0_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79308-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79309-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics