Abstract
Neuroeconomics merges methods from neuroscience and economics to better understand how the human brain generates decisions in economic and social contexts. The emerging neuroeconomic approach (Camerer et al. 2005; Fehr et al. 2005; Glimcher and Rustichini 2004; Sanfey et al. 2006) seeks a microfoundation behind social and economic activity in neural circuitry, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), transcranialmagnetic stimulation (TMS), pharmacological interventions, and other techniques. Byproducts of such an ambitious program might include better understanding of individual pathologies in social behaviors, such as antisocial personality disorder or social phobia, and, more generally, poor individual decision-making abilities, including lacking the capacity to inhibit prepotent impulses. The approach may also provide insights into the effects of individual and social learning, empirical discipline of evolutionary modeling, and advice for how economic rules and institutions can be designed so that people react to rules in a socially efficient way. Here we review the actual and predicted impact of neuropeptides such as oxytocin and vasopressin on human trust and altruism. Traditional economic analyses generally make the simplifying assumption that people are exclusively self-regarding; however, a large body of experimental evidence (Fehr and Fischbacher 2003) has been amassed indicating that many people exhibit social preferences, i.e., their preferred choices are based on a positive or negative concern for the welfare of others and on what other players believe about them. Social neuroeconomics (Fehr and Camerer 2007) tries to understand the brain processes that govern these regular deviations from purely self-interested behavior. Part of this endeavor concerns studying the impact of hormones on other-regarding behaviors and trust in other people’s other-regarding behavior. Social neuroeconomics combines the tools of social cognitive neuroscience (Adolphs 2003; Blakemore et al. 2004; Lieberman 2007) with well-structured tasks taken from economic theory. These tasks come equipped with benchmark theoretical predictions about rational play and the social efficiency of outcomes, which are useful for interpreting the results and cumulating regularity across studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adolphs R (2003) Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. Nature Rev Neuroscience 4:165–178
Adolphs R, Tranel D, Damasio AR (1998) The human amygdala in social judgment. Nature 393:470–474
Baumgartner T, Heinrichs M, vonLanthen A, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2008) Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaption. Neuron 58, May 2008
Berg J, Dickhaut J, McCabe K (1995) Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games and economic behavior 10:122–142
Blakemore SJ, Winston J, Frith U (2004) Social cognitive neuroscience: where are we heading? Trends Cogn Sci 8:216–222
Bohnet I, Zeckhauser R (2004) Trust, risk and betrayal. J Econ Behav Org 55:467–484
Born J, Lange T, Kern W, McGregor GP, Bickel U, Fehm HL (2002) Sniffing neuropeptides: a transnasal approach to the human brain. Nature Neurosci 5:514–516
Camerer CF (2003) Behavioral game theory – experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Camerer C, Weigelt K (1988) Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium reputation model. Econometrica 56:1–36
Camerer C, Loewenstein G, Prelec D (2005) Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics. J Econ Lit 43:9–64
Carter CS (1998) Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23:779–818
Dana J, Cain DM, Dawes RM (2006) What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games. Org Behav Human Decision Proc 100:193–201
Domes G, Heinrichs M, Glascher J, Buchel C, Braus DF, Herpertz SC (2007) Oxytocin attenuates amygdala responses to emotional faces regardless of valence. Biol Psychiat 62:1187–90
Eckel C, Grossman P (1996) Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games Econ Behav 16:181–191
Fehr E, Camerer CF (2007) Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends Cogn Sci 11:419–427
Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2003) The nature of human altruism. Nature 425:785–791
Fehr E, Fischbacher U (2004) Third-party punishment and social norms. Evol Human Behav 25:63–87
Fehr E, Gächter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140
Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart J Econ 114:817–868
Fehr E, Kirchsteiger G, Riedl A (1993) Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quart J Econ 108:437–459
Fehr E, Fischbacher U, Kosfeld M (2005) Neuroeconomic foundations of trust and social preferences: Initial evidence. Am Econ Rev 95:346–351
Gintis H, Bowles S, Boyd R, Fehr E (2003) Explaining altruistic behavior in humans. Evol Human Behav 24:153–172
Glimcher PW, Rustichini A (2004) Neuroeconomics: the consilience of brain and decision. Science 306:447–452
Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B (1982) An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J Econ Behav Org 3:367–388
Heinrichs M, Meinlschmidt G, Wippich W, Ehlert U, Hellhammer DH (2004) Selective amnesic effects of oxytocin on human memory. Physiol Behav 83:31–38
Henrich J, Boyd R, Bowles S, Camerer C, Fehr E, Gintis H, McElreath R (2001) In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am Econ Rev 91:73–78
Huber D, Veinante P, Stoop R (2005) Vasopressin and oxytocin excite distinct neuronal populations in the central amygdala. Science 308:245–248
Insel TR, Shapiro LE (1992) Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:5981–5985
Insel TR, Young LJ (2001) The neurobiology of attachment. Nature Rev Neurosci 2:129–136
Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler R (1986) Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: entitlements in the market. Am Econ Rev 76:728–741
Kirsch P, Esslinger C, Chen Q, Mier D, Lis S, Siddhanti S, Gruppe H, Mattay VS, Gallhofer B, Meyer-Lindenberg A (2005) Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. J Neurosci 25:11489–11493
Knoch D, Pascual-Leone A, Meyer K, Treyer V, Fehr E (2006) Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science 314:829–832
Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak P, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435:673–676
Landgraf R, Neumann ID (2004) Vasopressin and oxytocin release within the brain: a dynamic concept of multiple and variable modes of neuropeptide communication. Front Neuroendocrinol 25:150–176
Ledyard J (1995) Public Goods: A survey of experimental research. In: Kagel J, Roth AE (eds), Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 111–194
Lieberman MD (2007) Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. Annu Rev Psychol 58:259–289
Meyer-Lindenberg A, Hariri AR, Munoz KE, Mervis CB, Mattay VS, Morris CA, Berman KF (2005) Neural correlates of genetically abnormal social cognition in Williams syndrome. Nature Neurosci 8:991–993
Mikula G (1972) Reward allocation in dyads regarding varied performance ratio. Zeit Sozialpsychol 3:126–133
Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am Econ Rev 83:1281–1302
Sanfey AG, Loewenstein G, McClure SM, Cohen JD (2006) Neuroeconomics: cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends Cogn Sci 10:108–116
Stein MB, Goldin PR, Sareen J, Zorrilla LT, Brown GG (2002) Increased amygdala activation to angry and contemptuous faces in generalized social phobia. Arch Gen Psychiat 59:1027–1034
Tillfors M, Furmark T, Marteinsdottir I, Fischer H, Pissiota A, Langstrom B, Fredrikson M (2001) Cerebral blood flow in subjects with social phobia during stressful speaking tasks: a PET study. Am J Psychiat 158:1220–1226
Uvnas-Moberg K (1998) Oxytocin may mediate the benefits of positive social interaction and emotions. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23:819–835
Winston JS, Strange BA, O’Doherty J, Dolan RJ (2002) Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nature Neurosci 5:277–283
Young LJ, Lim MM, Gingrich B, Insel TR (2001) Cellular mechanisms of social attachment. Horm Behav 40:133–138
Zak PJ, Stanton AA, Ahmadi S (2007) Oxytocin increases generosity in humans. PLoS ONE 2, e1128
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fehr, E. (2008). The Effect of Neuropeptides on Human Trust and Altruism: A Neuroeconomic Perspective. In: Pfaff, D., Kordon, C., Chanson, P., Christen, Y. (eds) Hormones and Social Behaviour. Research and Perspectives in Endocrine Interactions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79288-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79288-8_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79286-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79288-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)