The Role of Exotic Marine Ecosystem Engineers

  • Jeffrey A. Crooks
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 204)

Of all invader impacts, those likeliest to have the most wide-reaching consequences are alterations to ecosystems, as they can essentially “change the rules of existence” for broad suites of resident biota (Vitousek 1990). One often-considered class of ecosystem-level effects of exotics is the disruption of energy or material fluxes (Chap. 17, Grosholz and Ruiz). For example, the initiation of trophic cascades, which can be trig gered by events such as the invasion of new predators, can dramatically alter energy flow within ecosystems (e.g., Spencer et al. 1991). Similarly, the cycling of nutrients through biogeochemical pathways can be affected by exotics (e.g., Larned 2003). This can occur through the invasion of species that differ from natives in their utilization of nutrients, such as when nitrogen-fixing plants invade nitrogen-poor soils (Vitousek et al. 1987). In addition to directly affecting the cycling of energy or nutrients, exotics also can alter the actual physical or chemical nature of the ecosystem itself. Such organisms have been called ecosystem engineers (Jones et al. 1994, 1997).

Reduced to its essence, ecosystem engineers affect other biota via alterations to the abiotic environment (Fig. 16.1). These species create, destroy, or otherwise modify habitats, and thereby affect resources or stressors (e.g., living space, sedi ment, and ambient temperature) that affect other organisms (Jones et al. 1994; Crooks 2002). The beaver is the classic example of an ecosystem engineer. By cre ating dams out of trees, beavers dramatically change the nature of the ecosystem by converting forests to ponds, thereby benefiting aquatic species at the expense of ter restrial ones. Beavers have effects beyond pond creation, however. The trees they fell are themselves ecosystem engineers that create shade, provide structure for nests, and dampen winds, and the loss of these engineering functions alters forest areas.


Biological Invasion Zebra Mussel Ecosystem Engineer Abiotic Environment Ecosystem Engineering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen BJ, Williams SL (2003) Native eelgrass Zostera marina controls growth and reproduction of an invasive mussel through food limitation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 254:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertness MD (1984) Habitat and community modification by an introduced herbivorous snail. Ecology 65:370–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Britton-Simmons KH (2004) Direct and indirect effects of the introduced alga Sargassum muticum on benthic subtidal communities of Washington State, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 277:61–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown JH (1995) Organisms as engineers: a useful framework for studying effects on ecosystems? Trends Ecol Evol 10:51–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byers JE, Jones CG, Cuddington K, Talley TS, Hastings A, Lambrinos JG, Crooks JA, Wilson WG (2006) Using ecosystem engineers to restore ecological systems. Trends Ecol Evol 23:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlton JT (1979) History, biogeography, and ecology of the introduced marine and estuarine invertebrates of the Pacific coast of North America. PhD Thesis, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  7. Casas G, Scrosati R, Luz Piriz M (2004) The invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales) reduces native seaweed diversity in Nuevo Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina). Biol Invas 6:411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castilla JC, Lagos NA, Cerda M (2004) Marine ecosystem engineering by the alien ascidian Pyura praeputialis on a mid-intertidal rocky shore. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 268:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapin FS, Reynolds H, D'Antonio CM, Eckhart V (1996) The functional role of species in terrestrial ecosystems. In: Walker B, Steffen W (eds). Global change in terrestrial ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 403–428Google Scholar
  10. Chauvaud L, Thompson JK, Cloern JE, Thouzeau G (2003) Clams as CO2 generators: the Potamocorbula amurensis example in San Francisco Bay. Limnol Oceanogr 48: 2086–2092Google Scholar
  11. Coleman FC, Williams SL (2002) Overexploiting marine ecosystem engineers: potential consequences for biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 17:40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creese RSH, DeLuca S, Wharton W (1997) Ecology and environmental impact of Musculista senhousia (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Mytilidae) in Tamaki Estuary, Auckland, New Zealand. N Z J Mar Freshwater Res 31:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crooks JA (1996) The population ecology of an exotic mussel, Musculista senhousia, in a southern California bay. Estuaries 19:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crooks JA (1998) Habitat alteration and community-level effects of an exotic mussel, Musculista senhousia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 162:137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crooks JA (2001) Assessing invader roles within changing ecosystems: historical and experimental perspectives on an exotic mussel in an urbanized lagoon. Biol Invas 3:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crooks JA (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crooks JA (2005) Lag times and exotic species: the ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience 12:316–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crooks JA (2006a) Musculista senhousia. In: Boersma PD, Reichard S, Van Buren A (eds) Invasive species of the Pacific northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp 112–113Google Scholar
  19. Crooks JA (2006b) The arrival, establishment, and integration of an invasive marine mussel into foreign ecosystems. In: Koike F, Clout MN, Kawamichi M, De Poorter M, Iwatsuki K (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Assessment and Control of Invasion Risks. Shoukadoh Book Sellers, Kyoto, Japan, and IUCN Press, Gland, Switzerland, pp 113–115Google Scholar
  20. Crooks JA, Khim HS (1999) Architectural vs. biological effects of habitat-altering, exotic mussel, Musculista senhousia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 240:53–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crooks JA, Soulé ME (1999) Lag times in population explosions of invasive species. In: Sandlund OT, Schei PJ, Viken A (eds) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 103–125Google Scholar
  22. Cuddington K, Hastings A (2004) Invasive engineers. Ecol Model 178:335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cuddington K, Byers JE, Wilson WG, Hastings A (2007) Ecosystem engineers. Plants to protists. Elsevier, San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Curiel D, Guidetti P, Bellemo G, Scattolin M, Marzocchi M (2001) The introduced alga Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Alariceae) in the lagoon of Venice. Hydrobiologia 477:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Daehler CC, Strong DR (1996) Status, prediction and prevention of introduced cordgrass Spartina spp. invasions in Pacific estuaries, USA. Biol Conserv 78:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Darrigran G (2002) Potential impact of filter-feeding invaders on temperate inland freshwater environments. Biol Invas 4:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davies BR, Stuart V, de Villiers M (1989) The filtration activity of a serpulid polychaete population (Ficopomatus enigmaticus (Fauvel) ) and its effects on water quality in a coastal marina. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 29:613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. de Vos A, Manville RH, Van Gelder RG (1956) Introduced mammals and their influence on native biota. Zoologica 41:163–194Google Scholar
  29. Demopoulos AWJ (2004) Aliens in paradise: a comparative assessment of introduced and native mangrove benthic community composition, food-web structure, and litter-fall production. PhD Thesis. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HIGoogle Scholar
  30. Escapa M, Isaacch JP, Daleo JAP, Iribarne O, Borges M, Dos Santos EP, Gagliardini DA, Lasta M (2004) The distribution and ecological effects of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostreaigas. J Shellfish Res 23:765–772Google Scholar
  31. Ford MA, Grace JB (1998) Effects of vertebrate herbivores on soil processes, plant biomass, litter accumulation and soil elevational changes in a coastal marsh. J Ecol 86:974–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gratton C, Denno RF (2005) Restoration of arthropod assemblages in a Spartina salt marsh following removal of the invasive plant Phragmites australis. Restor Ecol 13:358–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gutierrez JL, Jones CG, Strayer DL, Iribarne O (2003) Mollusks as ecosystem engineers: the role of shell production in aquatic habitats. Oikos 101:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hallegraeff GM (1998) Transport of toxic dinoflagellates via ships ballast water: bioeconomic risk assessment and efficacy of possible ballast water management strategies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 168:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hastings A, Byers JE, Crooks JA, Cuddington K, Jones CG, Lambrinos JG, Talley TS, Wilson WG (2007) Ecosystem engineering in space and time. Ecol Lett 10:153–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hedge P, Kriwoken LK (2000) Evidence for effects of Spartina anglica invasion on benthic macrofauna in Little Swanport estuary, Tasmania. Aust Ecol 25:150–159Google Scholar
  37. Hewitt CL, Campbell ML, McEnnulty F, Moore KM, Murfet NB, Robertson B, Schaffelke B (2005) Efficacy of physical removal of a marine pest: the introduced kelp Undaria pinnatifida in a Tasmanian Marine Reserve. Biol Invas 7:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holloway MG, Keough MJ (2002) Effects of an introduced polychaete, Sabella spallanzanii, on the development of epifaunal assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 236:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hopkins CCE (2002) Introduced marine organisms in Norwegian waters, including Svalbard. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 240–252Google Scholar
  40. Jones CG, Gutiérrez JL (2007) On the purpose, meaning, and usage of the physical ecosystem engineering concept. In: Cuddington K, Byers JE, Wilson WG, Hastings A (eds) Ecosystem engineers. Plants to protists. Elsevier, San Diego, USA, pp 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 689: 373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957Google Scholar
  43. Kimmerer WJ, Gartside E, Orsi JJ (1994) Predation by an introduced clam as the likely cause of substantial declines in zooplankton of San Francisco Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 113:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larned ST (2003) Effects of the invasive, nonindigenous seagrass Zostera japonica on nutrient fluxes between the water column and benthos in a NE Pacific estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 254:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levi F, Francour P (2004) Behavioural response of Mullus surmuletus to habitat modification by the invasive macroalga Caulerpa taxifolia. J Fish Biol 64:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mayer CM, Rudstam LG, Mills EL, Cardiff SG, Bloom CA (2001) Zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha), habitat alteration, and yellow perch (Perca flavescens) foraging: system-wide effects on behavioural mechanisms. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:2459–2467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meinesz A (1999) Killer algae: the true tale of biological invasion. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  48. Mistri M (2004) Effect of Musculista senhousia mats on clam mortality and growth: much ado about nothing? Aquaculture 241:207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nalepa TF, Schloesser SW (1993) Zebra mussels. Biology, impacts, and control. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  50. Neideman R, Wenngren J, Olafsson E (2003) Competition between the introduced polychaete Marenzelleria sp. and the native amphipod Monoporeia affinis in Baltic soft bottoms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 264:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neira C, Levin LA, Grosholz ED (2005) Benthic macrofaunal communities of three sites in San Francisco Bay invaded by hybrid Spartina, with comparison to uninvaded habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 292:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newell RIE (1988) Ecological changes in Chesapeake Bay: are they the result of overharvesting the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica. In: Lynch MP, Krome EC (eds) Understanding the estuary: advances in Chesapeake Bay Research. Chesapeake Research Consortium Publication 129, Baltimore, Maryland, pp 536–546Google Scholar
  53. Newell RIE (2004) Ecosystem influences of natural and cultivated populations of suspension-feeding bivavle molluscs: a review. J Shellfish Res 23:51–61Google Scholar
  54. Ojaveer H, Leppäkoski E, Olenin S, Ricciardi A (2002) Ecological impact of Ponto-Caspian invaders in the Baltic Sea, European inland waters and the Great Lakes: an inter-ecosystem comparison. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 412–425Google Scholar
  55. Olenin S, Leppäkoski E (1999) Non-native animals in the Baltic Sea: alteration of benthic habitats in coastal inlets and lagoons. Hydrobiologia 393:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Phelps HL (1994) The Asiatic clam (Corbicula fluminea) invasion and system-level ecological change in the Potomac River Estuary near Washington, D.C. Estuaries 17:614–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Piazzi L, Cinelli F (2000) Effets de l'expansion des Rhodophyceae introduites Acrothamnion preissii et Womersleyella setacea sur les communautes algales des rhizomes de Posidonia ceanica de Metiterranee occidentale. Cryptogamie Algologie 21:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Posey M (1988) Community changes associated with the spread of an introduced seagrass, Zostera japonica. Ecology 69:974–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Posey M, Alphin TD, Meyer DL, Johnson JM (2003) Benthic communities of common reed Phragmites australis and marsh cordgrass Spartina alterniflora marshes in Chesapeake Bay.Mar Ecol Prog Ser 261:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Power ME (1997) Estimating impacts of a dominant detritivore in a neotropical stream. Trends Ecol Evol 12:47–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reusch TBH, Williams SL (1998) Variable responses of native eelgrass Zostera marina to a non-indigenous bivalve Musculista senhousia. Oecologia 113:428–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rudnick DA, Hieb K, Grimmer KF, Resh VH (2003) Patterns and processes of biological invasion: The Chinese mitten crab in San Francisco Bay. Basic Appl Ecol 4:249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ruiz GM, Fofonoff P, Hines AH (1999) Non-indigenous species as stressors in estuarine and marine communities: assessing invasion impacts and interactions. Limnol Oceanogr 44:950–972Google Scholar
  64. Salmon M, Reiners R, Lavin C, Wyneken J (1995) Behavior of loggerhead sea turtles on an urban beach. I. Correlates of nest placement. J Herpetol 29:560–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sax DF, Kinlan BP, Smith KF (2005) A conceptual framework for comparing species assemblages in native and exotic habitats. Oikos 108:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schwindt E, Bortolus A, Iribarne O (2002) Invasion of a reef-builder polychaete: direct and indirect impacts on the native benthic community structure. Biol Invas 3:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schwindt E, Iribarne OO, Isla FI (2004) Physical effects of an invading reef-building polychaete on an Argentinean estuarine environment. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 59(1):109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Spencer CN, McClelland BR, Stanford JA (1991) Shrimp stocking, salmon collapse, and eagle displacement. Cascading interactions in the food web of a large aquatic ecosystem. BioScience 41:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Staehr PA, Pedersen MF, Thomsen MS, Wernberg T, Krause-Jensen D (2000) Invasion of Sargassum muticum in Limfjorden (Denmark) and its possible impact on the indigenous macroalgal community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 207:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Steneck RS, Carlton JT (2001) Human alterations of marine communities: students beware! In: Bertness M, Gaines S, Hay M (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 455–468Google Scholar
  71. Stewart TW, Haynes JM (1994) Benthic macroinvertebrate communities of southwestern Lake Ontario following invasion of Dreissena. J Great Lakes Res 20:479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strayer DL, Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Findlay S, Pace ML (1999) Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves. Bioscience 49:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Talley TS, Crooks JA (2007) Habitat conversion associated with bioeroding marine isopods. In: Cuddington K, Byers JE, Wilson WG, Hastings A (eds) Ecosystem engineers. Plants to protists. Elsevier, San Diego, USA, pp 185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Talley TS, Crooks JA, Levin LA (2001) Habitat utilization and alteration by the burrowing isopod Sphaeroma quoyanum in California salt marshes. Mar Biol 138:561–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thieltges DW (2005) Impact of an invader: epizootic American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata reduces survival and growth in European mussels. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 286:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. van den Brink FWB, van der Velde G, bij de Vaate A (1993) Ecological aspects, explosive range extension and impact of a mass invader, Corophium curvispinum Sars, 1895 (Crustacea: Amphipoda), in the Lower Rhine (The Netherlands). Oecologia 93:224–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Van Dolah FM (2000) Marine algal toxins: origins, health effects, and their increased occurrence. Environ Health Perspect 108(Suppl 1):133–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vander Zanden MJ, Casselman JM, Rasmussen JB (1999) Stable isotope evidence for the food web consequences of species invasions in lakes. Nature 401:464–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Viejo RM (1999) Mobile epifauna inhabiting the invasive Sargassum muticum and two local seaweeds in northern Spain. Aquat Bot 64:131–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vitousek PM (1990) Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vitousek PM, Walker LR, Whiteaker LD, Mueller-Dombois D, Matson PA (1987) Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 238:802–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wallentinus I (2002) Introduced marine algae and vascular plants in European aquatic environments. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Distribution, impacts, and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 27–52Google Scholar
  83. Wallentinus I, Nyberg CD (2005) Introduced marine organisms as habitat modifiers. Mar Pollut Bull 55:323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Weis JS, Weis P (2003) Is the invasion of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into tidal marshes of the eastern US an ecological disaster? Mar Pollut Bull 46:816–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wernberg T, Thomsen MS, Staehr PA, Pedersen MF (2004) Epibiota communities of the introduced and indigenous macroalgal relatives Sargassum muticum and Halidrys siliquosa in Limfjorden (Denmark). Helgol Mar Res 58:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Whitcraft CR, Talley DM, Crooks JA, Boland J, Gaskin J (2007) Invasion of tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) in a southern California salt marsh. Biol Invas 9:875–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wikstrom SA, Kautsky L (2004) Invasion of a habitat-forming seaweed: effects on associated biota. Biol Invas 6:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  89. Wonham MJ, O'Connor M, Harley CDG (2005) Positive effects of a dominant invader on introduced and native mudflat species. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 289:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wright JP, Jones CG, Flecker AS (2002) An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Oecologia 132:96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zmudzinski L (1996) The effect of the introduction of the American species Marenzelleria viridis (Polcyhaeta: Spionidae) on the benthic ecosystem of Vistula lagoon. Mar Ecol 17:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey A. Crooks

    There are no affiliations available

    Personalised recommendations