Education and Qualification for Control and Automation

  • Bozenna Pasik-Duncan
  • Matthew Verleger


Engineering education has seen an explosion of interest in recent years, fueled simultaneously by reports from both industry and academia. Automatic control education has recently become a core issue for the international control community. This has occurred in tandem with the explosion of interest in engineering education as a whole. The applications of control are growing rapidly. There is an increasing interest in control from researchers from outside of traditionally control-based fields such as aeronautics, chemical, mechanical, and electrical engineering. Recently control and systems theory have had much to offer to nontraditional control fields such as biology, biomedicine, finance, actuarial science, and the social sciences as well as transportation and telecommunications networks. Complementary, innovative developments of control and systems theory have been motivated and inspired by complex real-world problems. These new developments present huge challenges in control education. Meeting these challenges will require a multifaceted approach by the control community that includes new approaches to teaching, new preparations for facing new theoretical control and systems theory problems, and a critical review of the status quo. This chapter discusses these new challenges as well as new approaches to education and outreach. This chapter starts by presenting an argument towards the future of controls as the application of control theory expands into new and unique disciplines. It provides two case studies of nontraditional areas where control theory has been applied: finance and biomedicine. These two case studies show a high potential for using powerful fundamental principles and tools of automatic control in research with an interdisciplinary nature. The chapter then outlines current and future pedagogical approaches being employed in control education, particularly introductory courses, around the world. It concludes with a discussion about the role of scholarship, teaching, and learning in control education both now and in the coming years.


Fractional Brownian Motion Asynchronous Transfer Mode Stochastic Partial Differential Equation Hurst Parameter Defense Advance Research Project Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



American Automatic Control Council


acquired immunodeficiency syndrome


air traffic management


asynchronous transfer mode


automatic teller machine


Chinese Control Conference


Control Systems Society


Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency


International Federation of Automatic Control


Intelligent Control/Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation


National Academy of Engineering


Stochastic Adaptive Control Group


science, technology, engineering, and mathematics


scholarship of teaching and learning


  1. 44.1.
    S. Bittanti, M. Gevers (Eds.): On the dawn and development of control science in the XX-th century (Special Issue), Eur. J. Control 13, 1–81 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 44.2.
    W.H. Fleming: Future Directions in Control Theory. A mathematical Perspective (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia 1988)Google Scholar
  3. 44.3.
    P. Antsaklis, T. Basar, R. DeCarlo, N.H. McClamroch, M. Spong, S. Yurkovich: Report on the NSF/CSS workshop on new directions in control engineering education, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 19, 53–58 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 44.4.
    R.M. Murray: Control in an Information Rich World (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia 2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 44.5.
    R.M. Murray, K.J. Åström, S.P. Boyd, R.W. Brockett, G. Stein: Future directions in control in an information rich world, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 23, 20–23 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 44.6.
    E.D. Sontag: Molecular systems biology and control, Eur. J. Control 11, 396–436 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 44.7.
    J.M. Bailey, W.M. Haddad: Paradigms, benefits, and challenges. Drug dosing control in clinical pharmacology, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 25, 35–51 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 44.8.
    S.H. Haas, M.G. Frei, I. Osorio, B. Pasik-Duncan, J. Radel: EEG ocular artifact removal through ARMAX model system identification using extended least squares, Commun. Inf. Syst. 3, 19–40 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 44.9.
    I. Osorio, M.G. Frei: Hurst parameter estimation for epileptic seizure detection, Commun. Inf. Syst. 7, 167–176 (2007)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 44.10.
    I. Osorio, M.G. Frei, S.B. Wilkinson: Real time automated detection and quantitative analysis of seizures and short term prediction of clinical onset, Epilepsia 39, 615–627 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 44.11.
    B. Pasik-Duncan: Random walk around some problems in identification and stochastic adaptive control with applications to finance. In: AMS-IMS-SIAM Joint Summer Research Conference on Mathematics of Finance (2003) pp. 273–287Google Scholar
  12. 44.12.
    B. Pasik-Duncan: Special issue on the stochastic control methods in financial engineering, IEEE Trans Automatic Control (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 44.13.
    P. Varaiya: Reducing highway congestion: an empirical approach, Eur. J. Control 11, 301–310 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 44.14.
    P.R. Kumar: New technological vistas for systems and control: the example of wireless networks. What does the future hold for the design of wireless networks?, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 21, 24038 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 44.15.
    T.E. Djaferis: Systems and control impact in a changing world. In: Chinese Control Conference (CCC) (Hunan, China 2007) pp. 21–28Google Scholar
  16. 44.16.
    B. Pasik-Duncan, R. Patton, K. Schilling, E.F. Camacho: Four focused forums. Math, science and technology in control engineering education, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 26, 93–98 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 44.17.
    G. Clough: The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century (National Academy, Washington 2004)Google Scholar
  18. 44.18.
    D. Oblinger: Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the “New Students”, EDUCAUSE Rev. 38, 36–45 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 44.19.
    B.S. Heck, D.S. Dorato, D.S. Bernstein, C.C. Bissell, N.H. McClamroch, J. Fishstrom: Future directions in control education, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 19, 36–53 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 44.20.
    G. Clough: Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century (National Academy, Washington 2005)Google Scholar
  21. 44.21.
    T.E. Duncan, B. Pasik-Duncan: Stochastic adaptive control. In: The Control Handbook, ed. by W.S. Levine (CRC, Boca Raton 1995) pp. 1127–1136Google Scholar
  22. 44.22.
    T.E. Duncan, B. Pasik-Duncan: Adaptive control of continuous time stochastic systems, J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 16, 327–340 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 44.23.
    B. Pasik-Duncan: Stochastic systems. In: Wiley Encyclopedia of IEEE, Vol. 20, ed. by J.G. Webster (Wiley, New York 1999) pp. 543–555Google Scholar
  24. 44.24.
    F. Black, M. Scholes: The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, J. Polit. Econ. 81, 637–654 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 44.25.
    R.C. Merton: Theory of rational option pricing, Bell J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 4, 141–183 (1973)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 44.26.
    S. Crepin, D. Houinato, B. Nawana, G.D. Avode, P. Preux, J. Desport: Link between epilepsy and malnutrition in a rural area of Benin, Epilepsia 48, 1926–1933 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 44.27.
    T.E. Djaferis: Automatic control in first-year engineering study, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 24, 35–37 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 44.28.
    D.S. Bernstein: Innovations in undergraduate education, Special Issue, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 24, 1–101 (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 44.29.
    D.S. Bernstein: Innovations in undergraduate education: Part II, Special Issue, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 25, 1–106 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 44.30.
    K.J. Åström: Challenges in control education, 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education (Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 2006)Google Scholar
  31. 44.31.
    DARPA: Vol. 2008: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA, 2007)
  32. 44.32.
    The MathWorks Inc.: Using MATLAB. The Language of Technical Computing (The MathWorks Inc., Natick 2002)Google Scholar
  33. 44.33.
    K.J. Åström, R.E. Klein, A. Lennartson: Bicycle dynamics and control, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 25, 26–47 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. 44.34.
    M.W. Spong: Project based control education, 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education (Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 2006)Google Scholar
  35. 44.35.
    P.J. Gawthrop, E. McGookin: Using LEGO in control education, 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education (Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 2006)Google Scholar
  36. 44.36.
    J. LaCombe, C. Rogers, E. Wang: Using Lego Bricks To Conduct Engineering Experiments (American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City 2004)Google Scholar
  37. 44.37.
    N. Jaksic, D. Spencer: An Introduction To Mechatronics Experiment: Lego Mindstorms Next Urban Challenge (American Society for Engineering Education, Honolulu 2007)Google Scholar
  38. 44.38.
    D. Hansen, B. Self, B. Self, J. Wood: Teaching Undergraduate Kinetics Using A Lego Mindstorms Race Car Competition (American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, 2004)Google Scholar
  39. 44.39.
    B.S. Heck, N.S. Clements, A.A. Ferri: A LEGO experiment for embedded control system design, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 24, 43–56 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 44.40.
    D.S. Bernstein: The quanser DC motor control trainer – individual or team learning for hands-on education, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 25, 90–93 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 44.41.
    S. Dormido: The role of interactivity in control learning, 6th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education (Oulu, 2003)Google Scholar
  42. 44.42.
    J.L. Guzman, K.J. Åström, S. Dormido, T. Hagglund, Y. Piguet: Interactive learning modules for PID control, 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education (Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 2006)Google Scholar
  43. 44.43.
    M. Johansson, M. Galvert, K.J. Åström: Interactive tools for education in automatic control, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 18, 33–40 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.44.
    B. Pasik-Duncan: Workshop for Czech high school students and teachers at the 16th IFAC world congress, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 26, 110–111 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 44.45.
    M.H. Shor, F.B. Hanson: Bringing control to students and teachers, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 24, 20–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 44.46.
    B. Pasik-Duncan: Mathematics education of tomorrow, Assoc. Women Math. (AWM) Newslett. 34, 6–11 (2004)Google Scholar
  47. 44.47.
    D. Duncan, B. Pasik-Duncan: Undergraduatesʼ partnership with K-12, American Control Conference (Anchorage, 2002) pp. 1103–1107Google Scholar
  48. 44.48.
    M.K. Michael: Encouraging young women toward engineering and applied sciences: ISIC/MED special preconference workshop, IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 26, 100–101 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  49. 44.49.
    B. Pasik-Duncan, T. Duncan: KU stochastical adaptive control undergraduate success stories, Am. Control Conf. (ACC) (Anchorage 2002) pp. 1085–1086Google Scholar
  50. 44.50.
    IFAC Technical Committee on Control Education (EDCOM): (last accessed February 19, 2009)
  51. 44.51.
    D. Purkerson Hammer, S.M. Paulsen: Strategies and processes to design an integrated, longitudinal professional skills development course sequence, Am. J. Pharmaceut. Educ. 65, 77–85 (2001)Google Scholar
  52. 44.52.
    B. Pasik-Duncan, T.E. Duncan: Research experience at all levels, American Control Conference (Maui, 2003) pp. 3036–3038Google Scholar
  53. 44.53.
    Illinois State University: (last accessed February 19, 2009)
  54. 44.54.
    K. Lewin: Action research and minority problems, J. Social Issues 2, 34–46 (1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 44.55.
    E.L. Boyer: Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate (Princeton Univ. Press, Lawrenceville 1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Engineering EducationPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations