Skip to main content

Comparison of Two Multi-Agent Algorithms: ACO and PSO for the Optimization of a Brushless DC Wheel Motor

  • Chapter
Intelligent Computer Techniques in Applied Electromagnetics

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 119))

Abstract

Particle swarm optimization (PSO) and ant-colony optimization (ACO) are novel multi-agent algorithms able to solve complex problem. By consequence, it would seem wise to compare their performances for solving such problems. For this purpose, both algorithms are compared together and with Matlab’s GA in term of accuracy of the solution and computation time. In this paper the optimization is applied on the design of a brushless DC wheel motor that is known as a nonlinear multimodal benchmark.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Dorigo, V. Maniezzo, and A. Colorni, Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet – Part B26 (1), Italy, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kennedy and R.C. Eberhat, Particle swarm optimization, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Hou, Y. Wu, L. Lu, and X. Xiong, Generalized ant colony optimization for economic dispatch of power system, Power System Technology, Proceedings PowerCon, vol. 1, pp. 225–229, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Venkataraman, Applied Optimization with Matlab®; Programming. Wiley, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Erbas, S. Cerav-Erbas, and D. Pimentel, Multiobjective optimization and evolutionary algorithms for the application mapping problem in multiprocessor system-on-chip design, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comp. 10(3): 358–374, Jun. 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Moussouni, S. Brisset, and P. Brochet, Some results on the design of the brushless DC wheel motor using SQP and GA, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics-IJAEM, vol. 3, 4-2007. http://12ep.univ-lillel.fr/come/benchmark-wheel-motor.htm.

  7. D. Joshua, D. Knowles, L. Thiele, and E. Zitzler, A tutorial on the performance assessment of stochastic multi-objective optimizers, TIK-Report No. 214, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETH Zurich, February 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Colette and P. Siarry, Three new metrics to measure the convergence of meta-heuristics towards the Pareto frontier and the aesthetic of a set of solutions in bi-objective optimization, available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com.

  9. S. Brisset and P. Brochet, Analytical model for the optimal design of a brushless DC wheel motor, COMPEL 24(3), 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. http://l2ep.univ-lille1.fr/come/benchmark-wheel-motor.htm.

  11. F. Moussouni, S. Brisset, and P. Brochet, Some results on the design of the brushless DC wheel motor using SQP and GA, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech.–IJAEM, 3: 4, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Dorigo and C. Blum, Ant colony optimization theory: a survey, Theor. Comp. Sci. 344: 243–278, 2005.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Colorni, M. Dorigo, and M. Maniezzo, Investigation of some properties of an ant algorithm, Proceedings of the Second Conference on the Parallel Solving from Nature, Bruxelles, pp. 509–520, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Clerc and J. Kennedy, The particle swarm: explosion, stability, and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space, Evol. Comput. IEEE Trans. 6(1): 58–73, Feb 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. I.C. Trelea, The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection, Inf. Proceed. Lett. 85: 317–325, 2003.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moussouni, F., Brisset, S., Brochet, P. (2008). Comparison of Two Multi-Agent Algorithms: ACO and PSO for the Optimization of a Brushless DC Wheel Motor. In: Wiak, S., Krawczyk, A., Dolezel, I. (eds) Intelligent Computer Techniques in Applied Electromagnetics. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 119. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78490-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78490-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78489-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78490-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics