Advertisement

Andrology pp 1-10 | Cite as

Scope and Goals of Andrology

  • Eberhard Nieschlag

Andrology is defined as the branches of science and medicine dealing with reproductive functions of the male under physiological and pathological conditions (Statutes of the European Academy of Andrology).

Keywords

Reproductive Medicine Reproductive Function Male Infertility Infertile Couple Control Clinical Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abshagen K, Behre HM, Cooper TG, Nieschlag E (1998) Influence of sperm surface antibodies on spontaneous pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 70:355–356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Antes G (1998) Evidence based medicine. Internist 39:899–908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender S (1953) End results in treatment of primary sterility. Fertil Steril 4:34–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruckert E (1991) How frequent is unintentional childlessness in Germany? Androl 23:245–250Google Scholar
  5. Bundesärztekammer (2006) (Muster-)Richtlinie zur Durchführung der assistierten Reproduktion, Novelle 2006. www.bundesaerztekammer.de
  6. Collins JA, Burrows EA, William AR (1995) The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. Fertil Steril 64:22–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawkins R (2006) The selfish gene, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutsches IVF-Register (DIR) (2007) Bad SegebergGoogle Scholar
  9. European Academy of Andrology (EAA) (1999) Handbook. Int J Androl 22(Suppl):1Google Scholar
  10. Falk HC, Kaufmann SA (1950) What constitutes a normal semen? Fertil Steril 1:489–496PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Farley TMM, Belsey FH (1988) The prevalance and aentiology of infertility. In: Biological Components of Fertility. The Proceedings of the African Population Conference, Dakar, Senegal, November 1988. International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Liège, Belgium, vol 1, pp 2115–2130Google Scholar
  12. Gotzsche PC (1994) Is there logic in the placebo? Lancet 344:925–926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Habbema JDF, Collins J, Leridon H, Evers JLH, Lunenfeld B, teVelde ER (2004) Towards less confusing terminology in reproductive medicine: A proposal. Hum Reprod 19: 1497–1501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoorens S, Gallo F, Cave JA, Grant JC (2008) Can assisted reproductive technologies help to offset population ageing? An assessment of the demographic and economic impact of ART in Denmark and UK. Hum Reprod 22: 2471–2475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joffe M (2000) Time trends in biological fertility in Britain. Lancet 355:1961–1965CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Juul S, Karmaus W, Olsen J and The European Infertility and Subfecundity Study Group (1999) Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy: Pregnancy-based surveys from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. Hum Reprod 14:1250–1254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kamischke A, Nieschlag E (1999) Analysis of medical treatment of male infertility. Hum Reprod 14(Suppl 1):1–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Knuth UA, Mühlenstedt D (1991) Kinderwunschdauer, kontrazeptives Verhalten und Rate vorausgegangener Infertilitätsbehandlung. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 51:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McLeod J, Gold RZ, McLane CM (1955) Correlation of the male and female factors in human infertility. Fertil Steril 6: 112–120Google Scholar
  20. Nieschlag E, Hertle L, Fischedick A, Behre HM (1995) Treatment of varicocele: Counselling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermatica. Hum Reprod 10:347–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Nieschlag E, Hertle L, Fischedick A, Abshagen K, Behre HM (1998) Update on treatment of varicocele: counselling as effective as occlusion of the vena spermatica. Hum Reprod 13:2147–2150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sallmén M, Weinberg CR, Baird DD, Lindbohm ML, Wilcox AJ (2005) Has human fertility declined over time? Why we may never know. Epidemiology 16:494–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Scheike TH, Rylander L, Carstensen L, Keiding N, Jensen TK, Stromberg U, Joffe M, Akre O (2008) Time trends in human fecundability in Sweden. Epidemiology 19:191–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt L, Münster K (1995) Infertility, involuntary infecun-dity, and the seeking of medical advice in industrialized countries 1970–1992: A review of concepts, measurements and results. Hum Reprod 10:1407–1418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Snick HKA, Snick TS, Evers JLH, Collins JA (1997) The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: The Walcheren primary care study. Hum Reprod 12:1582–1588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Stephen EH, Chandra A (2006) Declining estimates of infertility in the United states: 1982-2002. Fertil Steril 86:516–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stolwijk AM, Straatman H, Zielhuis GA, Jongbloet PH (1996) Seasonal variation in the time to pregnancy: Avoiding bias by using the date of onset. Epidemiology 7:156–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Templeton AA (1992) The epidemiology of infertility. In: Templeton AA, Drife JO (eds) Infertility. Springer, London, pp 23–32Google Scholar
  29. Tietze C, Guttmacher AF, Rubin S (1950) Time required for conception in 1727 planned pregnancies. Fertil Steril 1:338–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. van Noord-Zaadstra BM, Looman CWN, Alsbach H, Habbema JDF, te Velde ER, Karbaat J (1991) Delaying childbearing: effect of age on fecundity and outcome of pregancy. Br Med J 302:1361–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird D (1995) Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation: Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med 333:1517–1521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. WHO (2009): Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. WHO, Geneva (in press)Google Scholar
  33. Ziebe S, Devroey P on behalf of the State of the Art 2007 Workshop Group (2008) Assisted reproductive technologies are an integrated part of national strategies addressing demographic and reproductive challenges. Hum Reprod Update 14:583–592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eberhard Nieschlag
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Andrology of the UniversityMönsterGermany

Personalised recommendations