This chapter addresses the methodological challenges of developing relevant scientific knowledge for a sustainable energy system transition in an innovative way. We argue that scientific contributions to sustainable development do not follow the ‘linear’ procedure from empirical knowledge production to policy advice. Instead, they consist of problem-oriented combinations of explanatory, orientationand action-guiding knowledge. Society and policy makers not only have to be ‘provided’ with action-guiding knowledge, but also with an awareness of the manner in which this knowledge is to be interpreted, and where the inevitable uncertainties lie. Since the sustainability question is inherently multi-dimensional, participation of social groups is an essential element of a strategy aimed at sustainable development. Multi-criteria decision support provides a platform to accommodate a process of arriving at a judgment or a solution for the sustainability question based on the input and feedback of multiple individuals. At the same time in practice, multi-criteria problems at tactical and strategic levels often involve fuzziness in their criteria and decision makers’ judgments. Therefore, we argue in favor of the use of fuzzy-logic based multi-criteria group decision support as a decision support tool for long-term strategic choices in the context of Belgian sustainable energy policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Afgan, N., Carvalho, M. and Hovanov, N. (2000), Energy System Assessment with Sustainability Indicators, Energy Policy, Vol. 28, 603–612.
Bana e Costa (Ed.) (1990), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Banville, C., Landry, M., Martel, J.M. and Boulaire, C. (1998), A Stakeholder Approach to MCDA, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 15, 15–32.
Beierle, Th. (2002), The Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions, Risk Analysis, Vol. 22, No. 4, 739–749.
Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (1991), De la justification. Les économies de grandeur, Gallimard, Paris.
Bouyssou, D. (1990), Building Criteria: A Prerequisite for MCDA, in C. Bana e Costa, Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 58–80.
Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (1990), Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Guitouni, A. and Martel, J. (1998), Tentative Guidelines to Help Choosing an Appropriate MCDA Method, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 109, 501–521.
Grunwald, A. (2004), Strategic Knowledge for Sustainable Development: The Need for Reflexivity and Learning at the Interface of Science and Society, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol. 1, No. 1/2, 150–166.
Haldi, P.-A., Frei, Ch., Beurskens, L. and Zhuikova, N. (2002), Multi-Criteria/Multi-Stakeholders Comparative Assessment of Electricity Generation Scenarios in the Sustainability Context: A Swiss Case Study, International Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 5, No. 1/2, 102–124.
Jones, M., Hope, Ch. and Hughes, R. (1990), A Multi-Attribute Value Model for the Study of UK Energy Policy, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 41, No. 10, 919–929.
Laes, E. (2006), Nuclear Energy and Sustainable Development. Theoretical Reflections and Critical-Interpretative Research Towards a Better Support for Decision Making, PhD dissertation, University of Leuven (KULeuven), Faculty of Engineering Sciences, Leuven.
Laes, E., Meskens, G., D’haeseleer, W. and Weiler, R. (2004), Trust as a Central Paradigm for Advisory Science: The Case of the Belgian Nuclear Phase Out, International Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1–26.
Laes, E., Meskens, G. and Ruan, D. (2004), Planning for Sustainability in the Belgian Electricity Sector: A Multi-Criteria Mapping Exercise, in D. Ruan and X. Zheng (Eds.), Intelligent Sensory Evaluation: Methodologies and Applications, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 311–326.
Lu, J., Zhang, G. and Wu, F. (2005), Web-Based Multi-Criteria Group Decision Support System, IEEE Computational Intelligence Bulletin, Vol. 5, No. 1, 35–43.
Lu, J., Zhang, G., Ruan, D. and Wu, F. (2007), Multi-Objective Group Decision Making – Methods, Software and Applications with Fuzzy Set Technology, Imperial College, London.
Lu, J., Zhang, G. and Ruan, D. (in press), Intelligent Multi-Criteria Fuzzy Group Decision Making for Situation Assessments, Soft Computing Journal.
Marimin, M., Hatono, I. and Tamura, H. (1998), Linguistic Labels for Expressing Fuzzy Preference Relations in Fuzzy Group Decision Making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 28, 205–217.
Mortier, F. and Raes, K. (1997), Een kwestie van behoren. Stromingen in de hedendaagse ethiek, Mys & Breesch, Gent.
Munda, G. (1995), Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment. Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics, Physica Verlag, Heidelberg.
Munda, G. (2004), Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation (SMCE): Methodological Foundations and Operational Consequences, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 158, No. 3, 662–677.
Munda, G. (2005), Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development, in J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott (Eds.), Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis. State of The Art Surveys, Springer International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, New York, 953–986.
Nishizaki, I. and Seo, F. (1994), Interactive Support for Fuzzy Trade-Off Evaluation in Group Decision Making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 68, 309–325.
Rauschmayer, F. (2000), Ethics of Multicriteria Analysis, International Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 3, No. 1, 16–25.
Rosa, E. and Clarke, D. (1999), Historical Routes to Technological Gridlock: Nuclear Technology as a Prototypical Vehicle, Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, No. 7, 21–57.
Roy, B. (1985), Méthodologie multicritère d’aide à la décision, Economica, Paris.
Roy, B. (1996), Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Analysis, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Stirling, A. (1997), Multi-Criteria Mapping – Mitigating the Problems of Environmental Valuation?, in J. Foster (Ed.), Valuing Nature? Ethics, Economics and the Environment, Routledge, London, 186–210.
Yager, R. and Zadeh, L. (1992), An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic Applications in Intelligent Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.
Zadeh, L. (1975a), The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Applications to Approximate Reasoning – Part I, Information Sciences, No. 8, 199–249.
Zadeh, L. (1975b), The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Applications to Approximate Reasoning – Part II, Information Sciences, No. 8, 301–357.
Zadeh, L. (1975c), The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Applications to Approximate Reasoning – Vol. III, Information Sciences, No. 9, 43–80.
Zhang, G. and Lu, J. (2003), An Integrated Group Decision-Making Method Dealing with Fuzzy Preferences for Alternatives and Individual Judgments for Selection Criteria, Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 12, No. 6, 501–515.
Zhang, G. and Lu, J. (2004), Using General Fuzzy Number to Handle Uncertainty and Imprecision in Group Decision Making, in D. Ruan and X. Zheng (Eds.), Intelligent Sensory Evaluation: Methodologies and Applications, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 51–70.
Zimmerman, H. (1987), Fuzzy Sets, Decision Making, and Expert Systems, Kluwer, Boston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laes, E. et al. (2008). Fuzzy-Set Decision Support for a Belgian Long-Term Sustainable Energy Strategy. In: Da Ruan, Hardeman, F., van der Meer, K. (eds) Intelligent Decision and Policy Making Support Systems. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 117. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78308-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78308-4_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78306-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78308-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)