Semantic Resources Integration and Interoperability in the Construction Domain

  • Simona Barresi
  • Yacine Rezgui
  • Celson Lima
  • Farid Meziane
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 3)

Abstract

Semantic resources, such as ontologies and taxonomies, are used in various domains to facilitate information exchange between people and software applications. However, in many cases, accessing a single semantic resource is no longer adequate. Consequently, new initiatives targeting the interoperability and integration of existing semantic resources have been recently increasingly investigated. This paper describes the methodology used during the FUNSIEC project to develop an Open Semantic Infrastructure for the European Construction Sector (OSIECS). This infrastructure aims to facilitate integration and interoperability between construction related semantic resources, providing a base for the development of a new generation of e-services for the domain.

Keywords

Ontology Semantic Resources Schema Matching 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Vetere, G.: OntoSeek: ContentBased Access to the Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(3) (May/June 1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gruber, T.: Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS) 43(5/6), 907–928 (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neches, R., Fikes, R.E., Finin, T., Gruber, T.R., Senator, T., Swartout, W.R.: Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing. AI Magazine 12(3), 36–56 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Partridge, C.: The Role of Ontology in Integrating Semantically Heterogeneous Databases, Technical Report 05/02, LADSEB-CNR, Padova, Italy (June 2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corporate Memory Management through Agents (CoMMA). In: Proceedings of E-Work & E-Business, Madrid (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rezgui, Y.: Review of Information and Knowledge Management Practices - State of the Art in the Construction Industry. The Knowledge Engineering Review Journal 16(3), 241–254 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corcho, O., Fernando-Lopez, M., Gomez-Perez, A.: Methodologies, Tools and Languages for Building Ontologies. Where is their Meeting Point? Data and Knowledge Engineering 46, 41–64 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fernandez-Lopez, M.: Overview of Methodologies for Building Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods (KRR5), Stockholm (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aussenac-Gilles, N., Biébow, B., Szulman, S.: Revisiting Ontology Design: a Methodology Based on Corpus Analysis. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) EKAW 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1937, pp. 396–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blazquez, M., Fernandez, M., Garcia-Pinar, J.M., Gomez-Perez, A.: Building Ontologies at the knowledge level using the ontology design environment. In: Proceeding of Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Banff, Canada (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holsapple, C.W., Joshi, K.D.: A Collaborative Approach to Ontology Design. Communication of the ACM 45(2), 42–47 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kayed, A., Colomb, R.M.: Extracting Ontological Concepts for Tendering Conceptual Structures. Data and Knowledge Engineering 40, 71–89 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pinto, H.S., Gomez-Perez, A., Martins, J.P.: Some Issues on Ontology Integration. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods (KRR5), Stockholm, Sweden (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pinto, H.S., Martins, J.P.: Reusing Ontologies. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2000 Spring Symposium Series, Workshop on Bringing Knowledge to Business Processes, SS-00-03, pp. 77–84. AAAI Press, Stanford (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klein, M.: Combining and Relating Ontologies: An Analysis of Problems and Solutions. In: Gomez-Perez, A., Gruninger, M., Stuckenschmidt, H., Uschold, M. (eds.) IJCAI 2001. Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, Seattle, USA (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kietz, J.U., Maedche, A., Volz, R.: A Method for Semi-Automatic Ontology Acquisition from a Corporate Intranet. In: EKAW 2000 Workshop on Ontologies and Texts, Juan-Les-Pins: CEUR Proceedings, vol. 51 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gruninger, M., Fox, M.S.: Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies. In: Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, Montreal (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Ontological Analysis of Taxonomic Relationships. In: Laender, A.H.F., Liddle, S.W., Storey, V.C. (eds.) ER 2000. LNCS, vol. 1920, pp. 210–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kalfoglou, Y., Robertson, D.: Use of Formal Ontologies to Support Error Checking in Specifications. In: Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) EKAW 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1621, pp. 207–224. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klein, M., Fensel, D.: Ontology Versioning on the Semantic Web. In: SWWS 2001. First International Semantic Web Workshop, Stanford (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klein, M., Fensel, D., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanov, D.: Ontology Versioning and Change Detection on the Web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Noy, N.F., Klein, M.: Ontology Evolution: Not the Same as Schema Evolution. Technical Report SMI-2002-0926, Stanford (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kalfoglou, Y., Schorelmmer, M.: Ontology Mapping: the State of the Art. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(1), 1–32 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment. In: AAAI 2000. 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Austin (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sure, Y., Erdmann, M., Angele, J., Staab, S., Studer, R., Wenke, D.: OntoEdit: Collaborative Ontology Engineering for the Semantic Web. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 221–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bechhofer, S., Horrocks, I., Goble, C., Stevens, R.: OilEd: A Reasonable Ontology Editor for the Semantic Web. In: Baader, F., Brewka, G., Eiter, T. (eds.) KI 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2174, pp. 396–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grosso, E., Eriksson, H., Fergerson, R.W., Tu, S.W., Musen, M.M.: Knowledge Modelling at the Millennium - the Design and Evolution of Protégé-2000. In: KAW 1999. Proc. the 12th International Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Mangement, Banff (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Farquhar, A., Fikes, R., Rice, J.: The Ontolingua Server: A Tool for Collaborative Ontology Construction. In: KAW 1996. Proceedings of the 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop, Ban, pp. 44.1–44.19 (1996)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lenat, D.B., Guha, R.V.: Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference. In: The Cyc Project, Addison-Wesley, Boston (1990)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chalupsky, H.: OntoMorph: a Translation System for Symbolic Knowledge. In: KR 2000. Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 471–482. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McGuiness, D.L., Fikes, R., Rice, J., Wilder, S.: An Environment for Merging and Testing Large Ontologies. In: Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning 5KR 2000, Breckenridge, USA (April 12-15, 2000)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stumme, G., Ad Maedche, A.: Ontology Merging for Federated Ontologies on the Semantic Web. In: Gomez-Perez, A., Gruninger, M., Stuckenschmidt, H., Uschold, M. (eds.) IJCAI 2001. Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, Seattle, USA (August 4-5, 2001)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li, W., Clifton, C.: Semantic Integration in Heterogeneous Databases Using Neural Network. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference On Very Large Data Bases, pp. 1–12. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1994)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Milo, T., Zohar, S.: Using Schema Matching to Simplify Heterogeneous Data Transaction. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference On Very Large Data Bases, pp. 122–133. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A Survey of Approaches to Automatic Schema Matching. VLDB Journal 10(4) (December 2001)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    eConstruct, Final Edition of the bcXML Specifications (2001), http://www.econstruct.org/6public/bcxml_cd/publicdeliverables/d103_v2.pdf
  37. 37.
    ISO DIS 12006-3. Organisation of Information About Construction Works. Part 3. Framework for object-oriented information. International Standards Organisation (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lima, C., Storer, G., Zarli, A., Ferreira-da-Silva, C.: Towards a Framework for Managing Standards-Based Semantic E-Resources in the European Construction Industry. In: CRC. Proceedings of Construction Research Congress, San Diego, US (April 2005)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Le Duc, C.: Transformation d’Ontologies Basées sur la Logique de Description - Application dans le Commerce Electronique. Thesis (PhD), Université de Nice (2004)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lima, C., Ferreira da Silva, C., Sousa, P., Pimentão, J.P., Le-Duc, C.: Interoperability among Semantic Resources in Construction: Is it Feasible? In: CIB-W 1978 Conference, Dresden, Germany (July 2005)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lima, C., Ferreira-da-Silva, C., Le Duc, C., Zarli, A.: A Framework to Support Interoperability among Semantic Resources. In: Proceedings of INTEROP-ESA 2005, Geneva, Switzerland (February 2005)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rezgui, Y., Meziane, F.: A Web Service Implementation of a User Centred Knowledge Management Platform. In: International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, vol. 1(4), Idea Group Publishing, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barresi, S., Rezgui, Y., Lima, C., Meziane, F.: Architecture to Support Semantic Resources Interoperability. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Interoperability of Heterogeneous Information Systems, pp. 79–82. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    D2.2 - The OSIECS Infrastructure - Assessment and Validation. Feasibility Study for a Unified Semantic Infrastructure in the European Construction Sector, http://liris.cnrs.fr/publis/?id=2188

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simona Barresi
    • 1
  • Yacine Rezgui
    • 1
  • Celson Lima
    • 2
  • Farid Meziane
    • 1
  1. 1.Informatics Research Institute (IRIS)University of SalfordSalfordUK
  2. 2.Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment (CSTB)Sophia-AntipolisFrance

Personalised recommendations