Contents
The spatial models presented in the last two chapters used overlapping α–cuts to determine compromises between individuals. In this chapter, we take a closer look at the assumptions implicit in such a method. In particular, we consider ways in which individuals rank alternatives in multiple dimensions.
The chapter begins by returning to the interpretation of fuzzy membership scores. While in earlier chapters the scores on the interval [0,1] represented the degree of inclusion in the set ‘excellent policies,’ here we propose that membership scores also convey information about the intensity of preferences . Not only might a score of 1 assigned to a policy mean that a person prefers that policy to one assigned a score of .5; the score of 1 might also mean that the person cares more about the policy assigned a 1. Systematically accounting for intensity may be fruitful for formal models, but we leave the issue open and instead use an understanding of intensity to guide our choice of aggregation operators, discussed in the next section.
Spatial models are useful because they provide a visual representation of preferences. To derive predictions from a spatial model, we need to know how actors make compromises. If all actors could have policies exactly at their ideal points, spatial models would be simple. Plotting the ideal points of actors would suffice to show the resulting policies. Politics in the real world, however, do not allow all actors to have their way and so require trade-offs and compromise. One way to model compromise is to use straightforward Euclidean distance, so that two actors would be giving up an equal amount if a chosen policy was equidistant from their ideal points. We have spoken at length about how simple Euclidean distance may be an overly restrictive assumption. In this chapter we present a collection of aggregation operators that each offer a different interpretation of trade-offs an actor is willing to make between dimensions and so each result in a slightly different method of modeling compromise. These operators are considered in more detail in the appendix following the chapter, along with other fuzzy operators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aczél, J.: Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York (1966)
Bellman, R.E., Giertz, M.: On the analytic formalism of the theory of fuzzy sets. Information Sciences 5, 149–156 (1973)
Dombi, J.: A general class of fuzzy operators, the De Morgan class of fuzzy operators and fuzziness measures induced by fuzzy operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 8(2), 149–163 (1982)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: New results about properties and semantics of fuzzy set–theoretic operations. In: Wang, P.P., Chang, S.K. (eds.) Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications to Policy Analysis and Information Systems, pp. 59–75. Plenum Press, New York (1980)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An overview of aggregation operators. Information Sciences 36(1,2), 85–121 (1985)
Frank, M.J.: On the simultaneous associativity of f(x, y) and x+y-f(x, y). Aequationes Mathematicae 19(2,3), 194–226 (1979)
Hamacher, H.: Über logische verknüpfungen unscharfer aussagen und deren zugehörige bewertungs-funktionen. In: Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research, pp. 276–287 (1978)
Klir, G.J., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, and Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers by Lotfi A. Zadeh, 1st edn. World Scientific, Singapore (1996)
Menger, K.: Statistical metrics. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 28, 535–537 (1942)
Riker, W.H.: Liberalism Against Populism. Freeman, San Francisco (1982)
Schweizer, B., Sklar, A.: Associate functions and statistical triangle inequalities. Publicationes Mathematicae, Debrecen 8, 169–186 (1961)
Schweizer, B., Sklar, A.: Associative functions and abstract semigroups. Publicationes Mathematicae, Debrecen 10, 69–81 (1963)
Schweizer, B., Sklar, A.: Probability Metric Spaces. North-Holland, New York (1983)
Yager, R.R.: On a general class of fuzzy connectives. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 4(3), 235–242 (1980)
Yager, R.R.: Ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18, 183–190 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clark, T.D., Larson, J.M., Mordeson, J.N., Potter, J.D., Wierman, M.J. (2008). Estimating Fuzzy Policy Preferences. In: Applying Fuzzy Mathematics to Formal Models in Comparative Politics. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 225. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77461-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77461-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77460-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77461-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)