Skip to main content

Timetabling Problems at the TU Eindhoven

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNTCS,volume 3867)

Abstract

The students of the Industrial Design department at the TU Eindhoven are allowed to design part of their curriculum by selecting courses from a huge course pool. They do this by handing in ordered preference lists with their favorite courses for the forthcoming time period. Based on this information (and on many other constraints), the department then assigns courses to students. Until recently, the assignment was computed by human schedulers who used a quite straightforward greedy approach. In 2005, however, the number of students increased substantially, and as a consequence the greedy approach no longer yielded acceptable results.

This paper discusses the solution of this real-world timetabling problem. We present a complete mathematical formulation of it, and we explain all the constraints resulting from the situation in Eindhoven. We solve the problem using lexicographical optimization with four subproblems. For all four subproblems, an elegant integer linear programming model is given which easily can be put into CPLEX. Finally, we report on our computational experiments and results around the Eindhoven real-world data.

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahuja, R.K., Magnanti, T.L., Orlin, J.B.: Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avella, P., Vasilev, I.: A computational study of a cutting plane algorithm for university course timetabling. Journal of Scheduling 8, 497–514 (2005)

    CrossRef  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Burke, E.K., Kingston, J., Jackson, K., Weare, R.: Automated university timetabling: the state of the art. The Computer Journal 40, 565–571 (1997)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Burke, E.K., McCollum, B., McMullan, J.P., Qu, R.: Examination timetabling: A new formulation. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling, Brno, pp. 373–375 (August 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burke, E.K., Petrovic, S.: Recent research directions in automated timetabling. European Journal of Operations Research 140, 266–280 (2002)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Busam, V.A.: An algorithm for class scheduling with section preference. Communications of the ACM 10, 567–569 (1967)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter, M.W., Laporte, G.: Recent developments in practical examination timetabling. In: Burke, E.K., Ross, P. (eds.) Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling. LNCS, vol. 1153, pp. 3–21. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carter, M.W., Laporte, G.: Recent developments in practical course timetabling. In: Burke, E.K., Carter, M. (eds.) PATAT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1408, pp. 3–19. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, E., Kruk, S., Lipman, M.: Flow formulations for the student scheduling problem. In: Burke, E.K., De Causmaecker, P. (eds.) PATAT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2740, pp. 299–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Daskalaki, S., Birbas, T.: Efficient solutions for a university timetabling problem through integer programming. European Journal of Operations Research 160, 106–120 (2005)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. de Werra, D.: An introduction to timetabling. European Journal of Operations Research 19, 151–162 (1985)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Dimopoulou, M., Miliotis, P.: Implementation of a university course and examination timetabling system. European Journal of Operations Research 130, 202–213 (2001)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Even, S., Itai, A., Shamir, A.: On the complexity of timetable and multicommodity flow problems. SIAM Journal of Computing 5, 691–703 (1976)

    CrossRef  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman, R., Golumbic, M.C.: Constraint satisfiability algorithms for interactive student scheduling. In: IJCAI 1989. Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1010–1016 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability – a Guide to NP-Completeness. Freeman, San Francisco (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Laporte, G., Desrochers, S.: The problem of assigning students to course sections in a large engineering school. Computational Operations Research 13, 387–394 (1986)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. McCollum, B.: A perspective on bridging the gap in university timetabling. In: Burke, E.K., Rudová, H. (eds.) PATAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 3867, pp. 3–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miyaji, I., Ohno, K., Mine, H.: Solution method for partitioning students into groups. European Journal of Operations Research 33, 82–90 (1981)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Petrovic, S., Burke, E.K.: University timetabling. In: Handbook of Scheduling: Algorithms, Models, and Performance Analysis, ch. 45, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sabin, G.C.W., Winter, G.K.: The impact of automated timetabling on universities – a case study. Journal of Operations Research Society 37, 689–693 (1986)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Schaerf, A.: A survey of automated timetabling. Artificial Intelligence Review 13, 87–127 (1999)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidt, G., Ströhlein, T.: Timetable construction – an annotated bibliography. The Computer Journal 23, 307–316 (1980)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Tripathy, A.: Computerised decision aid for timetabling – a case analysis. Discrete Applied Mathematics 35, 313–323 (1992)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zampieri, A., Schaerf, A.: Modelling and solving the Italian examination timetabling problem using tabu search. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling, Brno, pp. 487–491 (August 2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Edmund K. Burke Hana Rudová

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van den Broek, J., Hurkens, C., Woeginger, G. (2007). Timetabling Problems at the TU Eindhoven. In: Burke, E.K., Rudová, H. (eds) Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling VI. PATAT 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3867. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77345-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77345-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77344-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77345-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics