Advertisement

Looking for Unexpected Consequences of Interface Design Decisions: The MeMo Workbench

  • Anthony Jameson
  • Angela Mahr
  • Michael Kruppa
  • Andreas Rieger
  • Robert Schleicher
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4849)

Abstract

This paper discusses and illustrates work in progress on the MeMo workbench for early model-based usability evaluation of interface designs. Characteristic features of the workbench include (a) the prediction of errors via rules that refer to user attributes; and (b) the automatic generation of methods for performing specific tasks and for recovering from errors.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Möller, S., Englert, R., Engelbrecht, K., Hafner, V., Jameson, A., Oulasvirta, A., Raake, A., Reithinger, N.: MeMo: Towards automatic usability evaluation of spoken dialogue services by user error simulations. In: Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2006. the Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Pittsburgh, PA (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norman, D.A.: Design rules based on analyses of human error. Communications of the ACM 26, 254–258 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    John, B.E., Salvucci, D.: Multipurpose prototypes for assessing user interfaces in pervasive computing systems. pervasive computing 4(4), 27–34 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wood, S.D., Kieras, D.E.: Modeling human error for experimentation, training, and error-tolerant design. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, Orlando, FL (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paternò, F., Santoro, C.: Preventing user errors by systematic analysis of deviations from the system task model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 56(2), 225–245 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baber, C., Stanton, N.A.: Task analysis for error identification. In: Diaper, D., Stanton, N. (eds.) The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 367–379. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bastide, R., Basnyat, S.: Error patterns: Systematic investigation of deviations in task models. In: Coninx, K., Luyten, K., Schneider, K.A. (eds.) Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design, pp. 109–121. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Jameson
    • 1
  • Angela Mahr
    • 1
  • Michael Kruppa
    • 1
  • Andreas Rieger
    • 2
  • Robert Schleicher
    • 3
  1. 1.German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence 
  2. 2.Technische Universität Berlin — DAI-Labor 
  3. 3.Deutsche Telekom AG Laboratories 

Personalised recommendations