Skip to main content

Combinatorial Conditions for the Rigidity of Tensegrity Frameworks

  • Chapter
Horizons of Combinatorics

Part of the book series: Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies ((BSMS,volume 17))

Abstract

Rigidity of bar-and-joint frameworks has been studied for centuries. If the exact positions of the joints of such a framework are known, the rank of the so called rigidity matrix determines whether the framework is rigid1. If the underlying graph is given only, the rigidity of the framework cannot always be determined: if certain conditions (depending on the dimension of the space) are not satisfied then the framework cannot be rigid, no matter what the actual positions of the joints are, otherwise rigidity can be realized by some (in fact, almost all) positions of the joints. These graph theoretic conditions can be checked in polynomial time for the 1- and 2-dimensional frameworks, while the complexity questions are mainly open for higher dimensions. For surveys of such results the reader is referred to [6, 13, 16].

Supported by Grant No. OTKA T67651 of the Hungarian National Science Fund and the National Office for Research and Technology. The useful remarks of the referee are gratefully acknowledged.

For brevity, we use the word “rigid” instead of the more precise “infinitesimally rigid”, see the definitions in the next section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Asimow and B. Roth, The rigidity of graphs, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 245 (1978), 279–289.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Asimow and B. Roth, The rigidity of graphs II., SIAM J. Appl. Math., 68 (1979), 171–190.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. E. D. Bolker and B. Roth, When is a bipartite graph a rigid framework? Pacific J. Math., 90 (1980), 27–44.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Connelly and W. Whiteley, Second-order rigidity and prestress stability for tensegrity frameworks, SIAM J. Discrete Math., 9 (1996), 453–491.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Edmonds, Minimum partition of a matroid into independent subsets, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 69B (1965), 67–72.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Graver, B. Servatius and H. Servatius, Combinatorial Rigidity, American Mathematical Society (Providence, 1993).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. B, Jackson and T. Jordan, Connected rigidity matroids and unique realizations of graphs, J. Combinatorial Theory, Ser. B., 94 (2005), 1–29.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Jackson and T. Jordan, The d-dimensional rigidity matroid of sparse graphs, J. Combinatorial Theory, Ser. B., 95 (2005), 118–133.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Jordan, A. Recski and Z. Szabadka, Rigid tensegrity labellings of graphs, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Laman, On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures, Eng. Math., 4 (1970), 331–340.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Lovász and Y. Yemini, On generic rigidity in the plane, SIAM J. Algebraic and Discrete Methods, 3 (1982), 91–98.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Recski, A network theory approach to the rigidity of skeletal structures, Part II. Laman’s theorem and topological formulae, Discrete Applied Math., 8 (1984), 63–68.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Recski, Matroid Theory and Its Applications in Electric Network Theory and in Statics, Springer (Berlin, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Recski and O. Shai, One-dimensional synthesis of graphs as tensegrity frameworks, in: Proc. 4th Japanese-Hungarian Symposium on Discrete Math, and Its Appi, Budapest (2005), pp. 284–288.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Roth and W. Whiteley, Tensegrity frameworks, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 265 (1981), 419–446.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. W. Whiteley, Rigidity and Scene Analysis, in: Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry (J. E. Goodman and J. O’Rourke, eds.), CRC Press (Boca Raton, 1997), pp. 892–916.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 János Bolyai Mathematical Society and Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Recski, A. (2008). Combinatorial Conditions for the Rigidity of Tensegrity Frameworks. In: Győri, E., Katona, G.O.H., Lovász, L., Sági, G. (eds) Horizons of Combinatorics. Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77200-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics