Abstract
Rigidity of bar-and-joint frameworks has been studied for centuries. If the exact positions of the joints of such a framework are known, the rank of the so called rigidity matrix determines whether the framework is rigid1. If the underlying graph is given only, the rigidity of the framework cannot always be determined: if certain conditions (depending on the dimension of the space) are not satisfied then the framework cannot be rigid, no matter what the actual positions of the joints are, otherwise rigidity can be realized by some (in fact, almost all) positions of the joints. These graph theoretic conditions can be checked in polynomial time for the 1- and 2-dimensional frameworks, while the complexity questions are mainly open for higher dimensions. For surveys of such results the reader is referred to [6, 13, 16].
Supported by Grant No. OTKA T67651 of the Hungarian National Science Fund and the National Office for Research and Technology. The useful remarks of the referee are gratefully acknowledged.
For brevity, we use the word “rigid” instead of the more precise “infinitesimally rigid”, see the definitions in the next section.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
L. Asimow and B. Roth, The rigidity of graphs, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 245 (1978), 279–289.
L. Asimow and B. Roth, The rigidity of graphs II., SIAM J. Appl. Math., 68 (1979), 171–190.
E. D. Bolker and B. Roth, When is a bipartite graph a rigid framework? Pacific J. Math., 90 (1980), 27–44.
R. Connelly and W. Whiteley, Second-order rigidity and prestress stability for tensegrity frameworks, SIAM J. Discrete Math., 9 (1996), 453–491.
J. Edmonds, Minimum partition of a matroid into independent subsets, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 69B (1965), 67–72.
J. Graver, B. Servatius and H. Servatius, Combinatorial Rigidity, American Mathematical Society (Providence, 1993).
B, Jackson and T. Jordan, Connected rigidity matroids and unique realizations of graphs, J. Combinatorial Theory, Ser. B., 94 (2005), 1–29.
B. Jackson and T. Jordan, The d-dimensional rigidity matroid of sparse graphs, J. Combinatorial Theory, Ser. B., 95 (2005), 118–133.
T. Jordan, A. Recski and Z. Szabadka, Rigid tensegrity labellings of graphs, to appear.
G. Laman, On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures, Eng. Math., 4 (1970), 331–340.
L. Lovász and Y. Yemini, On generic rigidity in the plane, SIAM J. Algebraic and Discrete Methods, 3 (1982), 91–98.
A. Recski, A network theory approach to the rigidity of skeletal structures, Part II. Laman’s theorem and topological formulae, Discrete Applied Math., 8 (1984), 63–68.
A. Recski, Matroid Theory and Its Applications in Electric Network Theory and in Statics, Springer (Berlin, 1989).
A. Recski and O. Shai, One-dimensional synthesis of graphs as tensegrity frameworks, in: Proc. 4th Japanese-Hungarian Symposium on Discrete Math, and Its Appi, Budapest (2005), pp. 284–288.
B. Roth and W. Whiteley, Tensegrity frameworks, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc, 265 (1981), 419–446.
W. Whiteley, Rigidity and Scene Analysis, in: Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry (J. E. Goodman and J. O’Rourke, eds.), CRC Press (Boca Raton, 1997), pp. 892–916.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 János Bolyai Mathematical Society and Springer-Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Recski, A. (2008). Combinatorial Conditions for the Rigidity of Tensegrity Frameworks. In: Győri, E., Katona, G.O.H., Lovász, L., Sági, G. (eds) Horizons of Combinatorics. Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77200-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77200-2_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77199-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77200-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)