Advertisement

Sponsored Search with Contexts

  • Eyal Even-Dar
  • Michael Kearns
  • Jennifer Wortman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4858)

Abstract

We examine a formal model of sponsored search in which advertisers can bid not only on search terms, but on search terms under specific contexts. A context is any auxiliary information that might accompany a search, and might include information that is factual, estimated or inferred. Natural examples of contexts include the zip code, gender, or abstract “intentions” (such as researching a vacation) of the searcher. After introducing a natural probabilistic model for context-based auctions, we provide several theoretical results, including the fact that under general circumstances, the overall social welfare of the advertisers and auctioneer together can only increase when moving from standard to context-based mechanisms. In contrast, we provide and discuss specific examples in which only one party (advertisers or auctioneer) benefits at the expense of the other in moving to context-based search.

Keywords

Social Welfare Auction Mechanism Symmetric Nash Equilibrium Auctioneer Revenue Auction Setting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Borgs, C., Chayes, J., Etesami, O., Immorlica, N., Jain, K., Mahdian, M.: Dynamics of bid optimization in online advertisement auctions. In: WWW (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edelman, B., Ostrovsky, M., Schwarz, M.: Internet advertising and the generalized second price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review 97(1), 242–259 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Even-Dar, E., Kearns, M., Wortman, J.: Sponsored search with contexts (2007), Available at: http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~mkearns/papers/contexts.pdf
  4. 4.
    Lahaie, S.: An analysis of alternative slot auction designs for sponsored search. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, ACM Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palfrey, T.: Bundling decisions by a multiproduct monopolist with incomplete information. Econometrica 51(2), 463–483 (1983)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parkes, D., Sandholm, T.: Optimize-and-dispatch architecture for expressive ad auctions. Paper presented at the First Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, Vancouver, Canada (June 2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Varian, H.: Position auctions (Forthcoming). International Journal of Industrial Organization  (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eyal Even-Dar
    • 1
  • Michael Kearns
    • 2
  • Jennifer Wortman
    • 2
  1. 1.Google Research 
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania 

Personalised recommendations