Summary
This paper tackles the issues of the minimal and sufficient number of replication needed to evaluate correctly the mean value of a stochastic simulation results but also the shape of the results’ distribution. Indeed, stochasticity is more and more widespread in traffic flow models.
On one hand, microscopic models try to reproduce inter-vehicular deviation through stochastic algorithm. Distributions are sources of randomness. Even if many articles discuss the need for a certain number of simulations to obtain reliable results, they seldom if ever suggest a way to determine this number. Different simulations runs can produce various results due to a randomly assignment of desired speed of each car for example.
On other hand macroscopic models have no individual parameter. This can prevent them from representing some traffic phenomena as roundabout insertion; lane-changing; various desired speed…Stochasticity can overcome those weaknesses. Recently [1] presents a microscopic Lagrangian solution of LWR model allowing individual fundamental diagram.
Thereby, numerous runs have to be computed to estimate the mean value of a measure of effectiveness (MOE) but also to test if the results come from a particular stochastic process. The knowledge of the whole distribution allows us to determine every percentile needed (for example the 5% worse situations).
The aim of this paper is to propose a way to identify such distributions and to estimate the minimal number of replications that one should make to obtain a given confidence level.
We will focus on car-following component of models while lane changing, insertion (ramps, roundabout), and assignment will not be considered. However the proposed methodology can be applied to any components of traffic models.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ludovic Leclercq. Hybrid approaches to the solutions of the “Lighthill-Witham-Richards” model. Transportation Part B, 41:701–706, 2007.
M. Brackstone and M. Mc Donald. Car-following: a historical review. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology and Behaviour, (2):181–196, 1999.
Ludovic Leclercq, Jorge Andres Laval, and Estelle Chevallier. The Lagrangian coordinates and what it means for first order traffic flow models. In Richard E. Allsop, Michael G.H. Bell, and Benjamin G. Heydecker, editors, Transportation and Traffic Theory 2007 (ISTTT17), pages 735–754, London, U.K., 2007. Elsevier.
C. F. Daganzo. A variational formulation of kinematic waves: basic theory and complex boundary conditions. Transportation Research Part B, 39:187–196, 2005.
A. M. Law and W. D. Kelton. Simulation, Modeling and Analysis. McGraw-Hill, Boston, 3rd edition, 2000.
W. Burghout. A note on the number of replication runs in stochastic traffic simulation models. Technical Report CTR2004:01, Center for Traffic Research, 2004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chiabaut, N., Buisson, C. (2009). Replications in Stochastic Traffic Flow Models: Incremental Method to Determine Sufficient Number of Runs. In: Appert-Rolland, C., Chevoir, F., Gondret, P., Lassarre, S., Lebacque, JP., Schreckenberg, M. (eds) Traffic and Granular Flow ’07. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77074-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77074-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77073-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77074-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)