An Efficient Password-Only Two-Server Authenticated Key Exchange System
One of the prominent advantages of password-only two-server authenticated key exchange is that the user password will remain secure against offline dictionary attacks even after one of the servers has been compromised. The first system of this type was proposed by Yang, Deng and Bao in 2006. The system is efficient with a total of eight communication rounds in one protocol run. However, the security assumptions are strong. It assumes that one particular server cannot be compromised by an active adversary. It also assumes that there exists a secure communication channel between the two servers. Recently, a new protocol has been proposed by the same group of researchers. The new one removes these assumptions, but in return pays a very high price on the communication overhead. It takes altogether ten rounds to complete one protocol run and requires more computation. Therefore, the question remains is whether it is possible to build a protocol which can significantly reduce the number of communication rounds without introducing additional security assumptions or computational complexity. In this paper, we give an affirmative answer by proposing a very efficient protocol with no additional assumption introduced. The protocol requires only six communication rounds without increasing the computational complexity.
KeywordsActive Adversary Random Oracle Mutual Authentication Control Server Communication Round
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bellare, M., Canetti, R., Krawczyk, H.: A modular approach to the design and analysis of authentication and key exchange protocols. In: Proc. 30th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pp. 419–428. ACM, New York (1998)Google Scholar
- 3.Bellare, M., Rogaway, P.: Random oracles are practical: A paradigm for designing efficient protocols. In: First ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Fairfax, pp. 62–73. ACM, New York (1993)Google Scholar
- 5.Bellare, M., Rogaway, P.: Provably secure session key distribution – the three party case. In: Proc. 27th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, Las Vegas, pp. 57–66. ACM, New York (1995)Google Scholar
- 6.Bird, R., Gopal, I., Herzberg, A., Janson, P., Kutten, S., Molva, R., Yung, M.: Systematic design of two-party authentication protocols. In: Feigenbaum, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 1991. LNCS, vol. 576, pp. 44–61. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)Google Scholar
- 8.Brainard, J., Juels, A., Kaliski, B., Szydlo, M.: A new two-server approach for authentication with short secrets. In: USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 201–214 (2003)Google Scholar
- 12.Ford, W., Kaliski, B.: Server-assisted generation of a strong secret from a password. In: WETICE 2000: IEEE 9th International Workshop on Enabling, pp. 176–180. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2000)Google Scholar
- 13.IEEE. P1363.2 / D26: Standard Specifications for Password-based Public Key Cryptographic Techniques, (September 2006)Google Scholar