Being There: Participants and Spectators in Interactive Narrative

  • Ruth Aylett
  • Sandy Louchart
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4871)

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of evaluating interactive narrative and discusses the storification process through which a narrative is internalised. It establishes the range of roles that a user may take, and argues that the participant/non-participant distinction has a key role in storification. An experiment carried out as part of a larger test of a double appraisal approach to the creation of more dramatic characters is discussed. The results show that spectators and participants mark different stories as the most interesting, showing that this role difference does indeed impact their assessment of a narrative experience. The implications for story evaluation are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aylett, R.S., Louchart, S., Dias, J., Paiva, A., Vala, M., Woods, S., Hall, L.: Unscripted Narrative for affectively driven characters. IEEE Journal of Graphics and Applications 26(3), 42–52 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aylett, R., Louchart, S.: Towards a narrative theory of VR. Special issue on storytelling. Virtual Reality Journal 7, 2–9 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boal, A.: Theatre of the Oppressed. Theatre Communications Group, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruner, J.: The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry 18(1), 1–21 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cavazza, M., Charles, F., Mead, S.J.: Character-Based Interactive Storytelling. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17(4), 17–24 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dias, J., Paiva, A.: Feeling and Reasoning: a Computational Model. In: Bento, C., Cardoso, A., Dias, G. (eds.) EPIA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3808, pp. 127–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elliot, C.: The Affective Reasoner: A process model of emotions in a multi-agent system. PhD Thesis, Illinois (1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gratch, J., Marsella, S.: Tears and fears: Modeling emotions and emotional behaviors in synthetic agents. In: The Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green, M.C., Strange, J.J., Brock, T.C. (eds.): Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ho, W.C., Dias, J., Figueiredo, R., Paiva, A.: Agents that remember can tell stories: integrating autobiographic memory into emotional agents. In: AAMAS. Proceedings of Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kelso, M., Weyhrauch, P., Bates, J.: Dramatic presence. PRESENCE: The Journal of Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, MIT Press 2(1) (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knickmeyer, R., Mateas, M.: Preliminary evaluation of the interactive drama facade. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lazarus, R.: Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press, NY (1991)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.S.: Solving the narrative paradox in VEs - lessons from RPGs. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2792, pp. 244–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.S.: Evaluating synthetic actors. In: Proceedings, AISB Symposia 2007, University of Newcastle, April 2007, pp. 439–445 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Louchart, S.: Emergent Narrative – towards a narrative theory of Virtual Reality. PhD thesis, University of Salford (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Marsella, S., Johnson, W.L., LaBore, C.: Interactive Pedagogical Drama. In: The 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G., Collins, A.: The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prendinger, H., Becker, C., Ishizuka, M.: A study in users’ physiological response to an empathic interface agent. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 3(3), 371–391 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Riedl, M., Young, R.M.: An objective character believability evaluation procedure for multi-agent story generation systems. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3661, pp. 278–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tychsen, A., Hitchens, M., Brolund, T.: The Game Master. In: Proceedings of The Interactive Entertainment Conference 2005, Sydney, Australia (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Young, K.: The Neurology of Narrative. SubStance - Issue 94/95 30(1&2), 72–84 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Aylett
    • 1
  • Sandy Louchart
    • 1
  1. 1.MACS, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh. EH14 4ASUK

Personalised recommendations