Skip to main content

Applying MCRDR to a Multidisciplinary Domain

  • Conference paper
AI 2007: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4830))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper details updated results concerning an implementation of a Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules (MCRDR) system which can be used to provide quality Decision Support Services to pharmacists practicing medication reviews (MRs), particularly for high risk patients. The system was trained on 126 genuine cases by an expert in the field; over the course of 19 hours the system had learned 268 rules and was considered to encompass over 80% of the domain. Furthermore, the system was found able to improve the quality and consistency of the medication review reports produced, as it was shown that there was a high incidence of missed classifications under normal conditions, which were repaired by the system automatically. However, shortcomings were identified including an inability to handle absent data, and shortcomings concerning standardization in the domain, proposals to solve these shortcomings are included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peterson, G.: Continuing evidence of inappropriate medication usage in the elderly, in Australian Pharmacist 23, 2 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bates, D., Cullen, D., Laird, N., Petersen, L., Small, S., Servi, D., Laffel, G., Sweitzer, B., Shea, B., Hallisey, R.: Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events. Implications for prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. JAMA , pp.29–34 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peterson, G.: The future is now: the importance of medication review, in Australian Pharmacist, pp. 268–75 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bindoff, I., Tenni, P., Kang, B., Peterson, G.:Intelligent Decision Support for Medication Review. In: Advances in Knowledge Acquisition and Management, Conference. Location (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bindoff, I., Tenni, P., Peterson, G., Kang, B., Jackson, S.: Development of an intelligent decision support system for medication review. J. Clin. Pharm. Ther. 32, 81–88 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kinrade, W.: Review of Domiciliary Medication Management Review Software, Pharmacy Guild of Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations, and System Approaches. AICom - Artificial Intelligence Communications 7, 39–59 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Compton, P., Kang, B., Preston, P., Mulholland, M.: Knowledge Acquisition without Analysis. In: Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, Conference. Location (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tenni, P., Peterson, G., Jackson, S., Hassan, O. to I. Bindoff (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. MediFlags, http://www.mediflags.com/

  11. Compton, P., Jansen, R.: A philosophical basis for knowledge acquisition. In: European Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, Conference. Location (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rivest, R.: Learning Decision Lists. Machine Learning 2, 229–246 (1987)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang, B., Compton, P., Preston, P.: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kang, B., Compton, P., Preston, P.: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules: Evaluation and Possibilities. In: AIII-Sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, Conference. Location (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Preston, P., Edwards, G., Compton, P.: A 2000 Rule Expert System Without a Knowledge Engineer. In: AIII-Sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems, Conference. Location (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Compton, P., Jansen, R.: Cognitive aspects of knowledge acquisition. In: AAAI Spring Consortium, Conference. Location (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kang, B., Compton, P.: A Maintenance Approach to Case Based Reasoning (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bindoff, I.: An Intelligent Decision Support System for Medication Review, in Computing, vol. 65. University of Tasmania, Hobart (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tenni, P. to I. Bindoff (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Mehmet A. Orgun John Thornton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bindoff, I., Kang, B.H., Ling, T., Tenni, P., Peterson, G. (2007). Applying MCRDR to a Multidisciplinary Domain. In: Orgun, M.A., Thornton, J. (eds) AI 2007: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4830. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76928-6_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76928-6_53

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76926-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76928-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics