Abstract
In this work we present the design and implementation of a system for proof explanation in the Semantic Web, based on defeasible reasoning. Trust is a vital feature for Semantic Web. If users (humans and agents) are to use and integrate system answers, they must trust them. Thus, systems should be able to explain their actions, sources, and beliefs. Our system produces automatically proof explanations using a popular logic programming system (XSB), by interpreting the output from the proof’s trace and converting it into a meaningful representation. It also supports an XML representation (a RuleML language extension) for agent communication, which is a common scenario in the Semantic Web. The system in essence implements a proof layer for nonmonotonic rules on the Semantic Web.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic. In: WWW, pp. 48–57 (2003)
Levy, A.Y., Rousset, M.C.: Combining Horn rules and description logics in CARIN. Artificial Intelligence 104(1-2), 165–209 (1998)
Rosati, R.: On the decidability and complexity of integrating ontologies and rules. WSJ 3(1), 41–60 (2005)
Sintek, M., Decker, S.: TRIPLE - A Query, Inference, and Transformation Language for the Semantic Web. In: International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 364–378 (2002)
Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: A proposal for an OWL Rules Language. In: WWW 2004: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 723–731. ACM Press, New York (2004)
RuleML: The RuleML Initiative website (2006), http://www.ruleml.org/
Antoniou, G., Bikakis, A.: DR-Prolog: A System for Defeasible Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies on the Semantic Web. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (accepted for publication)
Bassiliades, N., Antoniou, G., Vlahavas, I.P.: Dr-device: A defeasible logic system for the semantic web. In: Ohlbach, H.J., Schaffert, S. (eds.) PPSWR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3208, pp. 134–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Grosof, B.N., Gandhe, M.D., Finin, T.W.: SweetJess: Translating DAMLRuleML to JESS. In: RuleML (2002)
Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: dlvhex: A System for Integrating Multiple Semantics in an Answer-Set Programming Framework. In: WLP, pp. 206–210 (2006)
Antoniou, G., Billington, D., Governatori, G., Maher, M.J.: Representation results for defeasible logic. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 2(2), 255–287 (2001)
Grosof, B.N.: Prioritized conflict handing for logic programs. In: ILPS 1997: Proceedings of the 1997 international symposium on Logic programming, pp. 197–211. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1997)
Antoniou, G., Maher, M.J., Billington, D.: Defeasible logic versus logic programming without negation as failure. J. Log. Program 42(1), 47–57 (2000)
Governatori, G., Maher, M.J., Antoniou, G., Billington, D.: Argumentation semantics for defeasible logic. J. Log. and Comput. 14(5), 675–702 (2004)
Antoniou, G., Billington, D., Governatori, G., Maher, M.J.: Embedding defeasible logic into logic programming. Theory Pract. Log. Program. 6(6), 703–735 (2006)
Maher, M.J., Rock, A., Antoniou, G., Billington, D., Miller, T.: Efficient defeasible reasoning systems. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 10(4), 483–501 (2001)
JADE: Java Agent Development Framework (2006), http://jade.tilab.com/
Barwise, J., Etchemendy, J.: The language of first-order logic. Center for the study of Language and Information (1993)
Shortliffe, E.: Computer-based medical consultations: MYCIN. American Elsevier, New York (1976)
Swartout, W., Paris, C., Moore, J.: Explanations in knowledge systems: Design for explainable expert systems. IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 06(3), 58–64 (1991)
McGuinness, D.L., Borgida, A.: Explaining subsumption in description logics. IJCAI (1), 816–821 (1995)
McGuinness, D.L., da Silva, P.P.: Explaining answers from the semantic web: the inference web approach. J. Web Sem. 1(4), 397–413 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Antoniou, G. et al. (2007). Proof Explanation for the Semantic Web Using Defeasible Logic. In: Zhang, Z., Siekmann, J. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4798. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76719-0_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76719-0_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76718-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76719-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)