Skip to main content

Adenosine Stress Echocardiography

  • Chapter
  • 1308 Accesses

Exogenous adenosine has an even more pronounced negative chronotropic and dromotropic effect than endogenous adenosine, making the appearance of advanced atrioventricular blocks more frequent with adenosine than with dipyridamole for equivalent doses. Adenosine is a direct alternative to dipyridamole – the prototype of vasodilator adenosinergic stress. Like dipyridamole, antianginal drugs lower the sensitivity of adenosine stress echocardiography, whereas concomitant therapy with oral dipyridamole potentiates the cardiovascular effects of adenosine. The safety record and short half-life make adenosine especially indicated in patients with severe aortic stenosis or elderly patients, who may be especially vulnerable to complications during dipyridamole or dobutamine stress. In some countries an additional limitation of adenosine is its exorbitant cost: in the United States, adenosine costs $179, dipyridamole $95, and dobutamine $1 per examination. However in Europe, it is also possible to obtain a galenic formulation of adenosine from hospital pharmacies at a very low cost of around €1. Possibly, more expensive third-generation selective A2A agonists may find a selective indication in patients with moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, who have an indication for stress imaging and may want to avoid adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction and respiratory compromise – although in these patients the use of the bronchodilator dobutamine might be more reasonable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Verani MS, Mahmarian JJ, Hixson JB, et al (1990) Diagnosis of coronary artery disease by controlled coronary vasodilation with adenosine and thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients unable to exercise. Circulation 82:80–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Picano E (1989) Dipyridamole-echocardiography test: historical background and physiologic basis. Eur Heart J 10:365–376

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arlington Medical Resources (2006) The myocardial perfusion market guide (US and Europe). Arlington Medical Resources, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Verani MS (1991) Adenosine thallium 201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Am Heart J 122:269–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bateman TM (2004) Cardiac positron emission tomography and the role of adenosine pharmacologic stress. Am J Cardiol 94:19D–24D

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paetsch I, Jahnke C, Wahl A, et al (2004) Comparison of dobutamine stress magnetic resonance, adenosine stress magnetic resonance, and adenosine stress magnetic resonance perfusion. Circulation 110:835–842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zoghbi WA (1991) Use of adenosine echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 122:285–292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Djordjevic-Dikic AD, Ostojic MC, Beleslin BD, et al (1996) High-dose adenosine stress echocardiography for noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1689–1695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lafitte S, Masugata H, Peters B, et al (2001) Accuracy and reproducibility of coronary flow rate assessment by real-time contrast echocardiography: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 14:1010–1019

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Caiati C, Zedda N, Montaldo C, et al (1999) Contrast-enhanced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler with adenosine: a noninvasive, rapid and effective method for coronary flow reserve assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:122–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, et al; European Association of Echocardiography (2008) Stress echocardiography consensus statement of the European Association of Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 9:415–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Korosoglou G, Dubart AE, DaSilva KG Jr, et al (2006) Real-time myocardial perfusion imaging for pharmacologic stress testing: added value to single photon emission computed tomography. Am Heart J 151:131–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cerqueira MD (2004) The future of pharmacologic stress: selective A2A adenosine receptor agonists. Am J Cardiol 94:33D–40D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Iskandrian AE, Bateman TM, Belardinelli L, Blackburn B, Cerqueira MD, Hendel RC, Lieu H, Mahmarian JJ, Olmsted A, Underwood SR, Vitola J, Wang W; ADVANCE MPI Investigators. (2007) Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. J Nucl Cardiol 14:645–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fredholm BB, Abbracchio M P, Burnstock G, et al (1994) Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors. Pharmacol Rev 46:143–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Drury AN, Szent-GyorgyA (1929) The physiological activity of adenine compounds with especial reference to their action upon the mammalian heart. J Physiol 68:213–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. MacCollin M, Peterfreund R, MacDonald M, et al (1994) Mapping of a human A2a adenosine receptor (ADORA2) to chromosome 22. Genomics 20:332–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Andreassi MG, Foffa I, Gherardi S, et al (2008) Genetic polymorphism in the adenosine A2A receptor affects coronary flow reserve response in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 29, Suppl 1

    Google Scholar 

  19. Conradson T-BG, Dixon CMS, Clarke B, et al (1987) Cardiovascular effects of infused adenosine in man: potentiation by dipyridamole. Acta Physiol Scand 129:387–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Biaggioni I, Olafsson B, Robertson RM, et al (1987) Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of adenosine in conscious man. Evidence for chemoreceptor activation. Circ Res 61:779–786

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Iskandrian AS, Verani MS, Heo J (1994) Pharmacologic stress testing: mechanism of action, hemodynamic responses, and results in detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 1:94–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beleslin BD, Ostojic M, Djordjevic-Dikic A, et al (1997) Coronary vasodilation without myocardial erection. Simultaneous haemodynamic, echocardiographic and arteriographic findings during adenosine and dipyridamole infusion. Eur Heart J 18:1166–1174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tawa CB, Baker WB, Kleiman NS, et al (1996) Comparison of adenosine echocardiography, with and without isometric handgrip, to exercise echocardiography in the detection of ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 9:33–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miyazono Y, Kisanuki A, Toyonaga K, et al (1998) Usefulness of adenosine triphosphateatropine stress echocardiography for detecting coronary artery stenosis. Am J Cardiol 82:290–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pizzuto F, Voci P, Mariano E, et al (2001) Assessment of flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler and venous adenosine infusion, before and after left anterior descending coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:155–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson R F, Wyche K, Christensen B V, et al (1990) Effects of adenosine on human coronary arterial circulation. Circulation 82:1595–1606

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kern M, Deligonul U, Tatineni S, et al (1991) Intravenous adenosine: continuous infusion and low dose bolus administration for determination of coronary vasodilator reserve in patients with and without coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 18:718–729

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cerqueira MD,Verani MS, Schwaiger M, et al (1994) Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:384–389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin T W, Seaworth JF, Johns J P, et al (1992) Comparison of adenosine, dipyridamole, and dobutamine in stress echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 116:190–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lette J, Tatum JL, Fraser S, et al (1995) Safety of dipyridamole testing in 73,806 patients: the Multicenter Dipyridamole Safety Study. J Nucl Cardiol 2:3–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Picano E, Marini C, Pirelli S, et al (1992) Safety of intravenous high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography. The Echo-Persantine International Cooperative Study Group. Am J Cardiol 70:252–258

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Picano E, Mathias W Jr, Pingitore A, et al on behalf of the EDIC study group (1994) Safety and tolerability of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography: a prospective, large-scale, multicenter trial. Lancet 344:1190–1192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zoghbi WA, Cheirif J, Kleiman NS, et al (1991) Diagnosis of ischemic heart disease with adenosine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 18:1271–1279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Edlund A, Albertsson P, Caidahl K, et al (1991) Adenosine infusion to patients with ischaemic heart disease may provoke left ventricular dysfunction detected by echocardiography. Clin Physiol 11:477–488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Marwick T, Willemart B, D'Hondt AM, et al (1993) Selection of the optimal nonexercise stress for the evaluation of ischemic regional myocardial dysfunction and malperfusion. Comparison of dobutamine and adenosine using echocardiography and 99mTc-MIBI single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 87:345–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Case RA, Buckmire R, McLaughlin D P, et al (1994) Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease and myocardial viability in ischemic syndromes using adenosine echocardiography. Echocardiography 11:133–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Takeishi Y, Chiba J, Abe S, et al (1994) Adenosine-induced heterogeneous perfusion accompanies myocardial ischemia in the presence of advanced coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 127:1262–1268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG (2007) Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Am Heart J 154:415–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Djordjevic-Dikic A, Ostojic M, Beleslin B, et al (2003) Low-dose adenosine stress echocardiography: detection of myocardial viability. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 1:7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hachamovitch R, Hayes S W, Friedman JD, et al (2005) A prognostic score for prediction of cardiac mortality risk after adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:722–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al (2007) Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 115:1769–1776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Patsilinakos S P, Kranidis AI, Antonelis I P, et al (1999) Detection of coronary artery disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis with noninvasive methods. Angiology 50:309–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Anthopoulos L P, Bonou MS, Kardaras FG, et al (1996) Stress echocardiography in elderly patients with coronary artery disease: applicability, safety and prognostic value of dobutamine and adenosine echocardiography in elderly patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:52–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Thomas GS, Tammelin BR, Schiffman GL, et al (2008) Safety of regadenoson, a selective adenosine A2A agonist, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RegCOPD trial). J Nucl Cardiol 15:319–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Picano, E., Ostojic, M., Citro, R. (2009). Adenosine Stress Echocardiography. In: Picano, E. (eds) Stress Echocardiography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76466-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76466-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76465-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76466-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics