Skip to main content

Some Remarks on CFD Drag Prediction of an Aircraft Model

  • Conference paper
New Trends in Fluid Mechanics Research
  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

Observed in CFD drag predictions for the DLR-F6 aircraft model with various configurations, some issues are addressed. The emphasis is placed on the effect of turbulence modeling and grid resolution. With several different turbulence models, the predicted flow feature around the aircraft is highlighted. It is shown that the prediction of the separation bubble in the wing-body junction is closely related to the inherent modeling mechanism of turbulence production. For the configuration with an additional fairing, which has effectively removed the separation bubble, it is illustrated that the drag prediction may be altered even for attached turbulent boundary layer when different turbulence models are used. Grid sensitivity studies are performed with two groups of subsequently refined grids. It is observed that, in contrast to the lift, the drag prediction is rather sensitive to the grid refinement, as well as to the artificial diffusion added for solving the turbulence transport equation. It is demonstrated that an effective grid refinement should drive the predicted drag components monotonically and linearly converged to a finite value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eliasson P. EDGE: A Navier-Stokes solver for unstructured grids. Scientific Report, FOI-R-0298-SE, FFA, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Stockholm, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Spalart P R. Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Paper 92-0439, Reno, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  3. Menter F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 1994; 32: 1598–1605

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilcox D C. Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA Journal, 1988; 26: 1299–1310

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Peng S H, Davidson L, Holmberg S. A modified low-Reynolds-number k-ω model for recirculating flows. ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1997; 119: 867–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wallin S, Johansson A V. An explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for compressible and incompressible turbulent flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2000; 403: 89–132

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Peng S H, Eliasson P. A comparison of turbulence models in prediction of flow around the DLR-F6 aircraft configuration. AIAA Paper 2004-4718, Providence, RI, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eliasson P, Peng S H. Drag prediction for the DLR-F6 wing-body configuration using the EDGE solver. AIAA Paper 2007-0897, Reno, NV, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vassberg J C, Tinoco E N, Mani M, et al. In: Summary of the Third AIAA Drag Prediction Workshop. AIAA Paper 2007-0260, Reno, 2007

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Tsinghua University Press & Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peng, S.H., Eliasson, P. (2007). Some Remarks on CFD Drag Prediction of an Aircraft Model. In: Zhuang, F.G., Li, J.C. (eds) New Trends in Fluid Mechanics Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75995-9_63

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics