Attrition, Selection Bias and Censored Regressions

  • Bo Honoré
  • Francis Vella
  • Marno Verbeek
Part of the Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics book series (ASTA, volume 46)


Panel Data Tobit Model Panel Data Model Attrition Bias Primary Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amemiya, T. (1984): Tobit Models: A Survey, Journal of Econometrics, 24, 3–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amemiya, T. (1985): Advanced Econometrics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Arellano, M., O. Bover and J.M. Labeaga (1999): Autoregressive Models with Sample Selectivity for Panel Data, in C. Hsiao, K. Lahiri, L. F. Lee, and H. Pesaran, eds., Analysis of Panels and Limited Dependent Variable Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 23–48.Google Scholar
  4. Charlier, E., B. Melenberg and A. van Soest (1995): A Smoothed Maximum Score Estimator for the Binary Choice Panel Data Model and an Application to Labour Force Participation, Statistica Neerlandica, 49, 324–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charlier, E., B. Melenberg and A. van Soest (2000): Estimation of a Censored Regression Panel Data Model Using Conditional Moments Restrictions Efficiently, Journal of Econometrics, 95, 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, S. (1997): Semi-Parametric Estimation of the Type 3 Tobit Model, Journal of Econometrics, 80, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandez-Val, I. and F. Vella (2005): Fixed Effects Estimation of Panel Models with Selection Bias, unpublished manuscript, MIT.Google Scholar
  8. Gourieroux, C., A. Monfort, E. Renault and A. Trognon (1987): Generalized Residuals, Journal of Econometrics, 34, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greene, W.H. (2004): Fixed Effects and Bias Due to the Incidental Parameters Problem in the Tobit Model, Econometric Reviews, 23, 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gronau, R. (1974): Wage Comparisons – A Selectivity Bias, Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1119–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hahn, J. and W.K. Newey (2004): Jacknife and Analytical Bias Reduction for Non-Linear Panel Models, Econometrica, 72, 1295–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hausman, J.A. and D.A. Wise (1979): Attrition Bias in Experimental and Panel Data: The Gary Income Maintenance Experiment, Econometrica, 47, 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heckman, J.J. (1974): Shadow Prices, Market Wages and Labor Supply, Econometrica, 42,679–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heckman, J.J. (1976): The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple estimator for Such Models, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement , 15, 475–492.Google Scholar
  15. Heckman, J.J. (1979): Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error, Econometrica, 47, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heckman, J.J. (1981): The Incidental Parameters Problem and the Problem of Initial Conditions in Estimating a Discrete-Time Discrete-Data Stochastic Process, in C.F. Manski and D. McFadden, eds., Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 179–195.Google Scholar
  17. Heckman, J.J. (2001): Micro Data, Heterogeneity, and the Evaluation of Public Policy: Nobel Lecture, Journal of Political Economy, 109, 673–748.Google Scholar
  18. Honoré, B.E. (1992): Trimmed LAD and Least Squares Estimation of Truncated and Censored Regression Models with Fixed Effects, Econometrica, 60, 533–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Honoré, B.E. (1993): Orthogonality Conditions for Tobit Models with Fixed Effects and Lagged Dependent Variables, Journal of Econometrics, 59, 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Honoré, B.E. and L. Hu (2004): Estimation of Cross-Sectional and Panel Data Censored Regression Models with Endogeneity, Journal of Econometrics,122, 293–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Honoré, B.E. and E. Kyriazidou (2000): Estimation of Tobit–Type Models with Individual Specific Effects, Econometric Reviews, 19, 341–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Honoré, B., E. Kyriazidou and C. Udry (1997): Estimation of Type 3 Tobit Models Using Symmetric Trimming and Pairwise Comparisons, Journal of Econometrics, 76, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu, L. (2002): Estimation of a Censored Dynamic Panel Data Model, Econometrica, 70,2499–2517.Google Scholar
  24. Keane, M., R. Moffitt and D. Runkle (1988): Real Wages Over the Business Cycle: Estimating the Impact of Heterogeneity with Micro Data, Journal of Political Economy, 96, 1232–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keynes, J.M. (1936): The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
  26. Kyriazidou, E. (1995): Essays in Estimation and Testing of Econometric Models, Northwestern University, Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
  27. Kyriazidou, E. (1997): Estimation of a Panel Data Sample Selection Model, Econometrica, 65, 1335–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kyriazidou, E. (2001): Estimation of Dynamic Panel Data Sample Selection Models, Review of Economic Studies, 68, 543–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lancaster, T. (2000): The Incidental Parameter Problem Since 1948, Journal of Econometrics, 95, 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee, M.J. and F. Vella (2006): A Semi-Parametric Estimator for Censored Selection Models with Endogeneity, Journal of Econometrics, 130, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, Q. and J.M. Wooldridge (2002): Semi-Parametric Estimation of Partially Linear Models for Dependent Data with Generated Regressors, Econometric Theory, 18, 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manski, C. (1987): Semi-Parametric Analysis of Random Effects Linear Models from Binary Panel Data, Econometrica, 55, 357–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Newey, W.K. (1984): A Method of Moments Interpretation of Sequential Estimators, Economics Letters, 14, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neyman, J. and E. Scott (1948): Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations, Econometrica, 16, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nijman, T.E. and M. Verbeek (1992): Nonresponse in Panel Data: The Impact on Estimates of a Life Cycle Consumption Function, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powell, J.L. (1987): Semi-Parametric Estimation of Bivariate Latent Models, Working Paper No. 8704, Social Systems Research Institute, University of Wisconsin–Madison.Google Scholar
  37. Quenouille, M. (1956): Notes on Bias in Estimation, Biometrika, 43, 353–360.Google Scholar
  38. Rasch, G. (1960): Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, Denmarks P\ae dagogiske Institut, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  39. Rasch, G. (1961): On the General Laws and the Meaning of Measurement in Psychology, Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Vol. 4, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  40. Ridder, G. (1990): Attrition in Multi-Wave Panel Data, in J. Hartog, G. Ridder and J. Theeuwes, eds., Panel Data and Labor Market Studies, Elsevier, North Holland.Google Scholar
  41. Rivers, D. and Q. Vuong (1988): Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models, Journal of Econometrics, 39, 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robinson, P. (1988), Root-$N$ Consistent Semi-Parametric Regression, Econometrica, 56, 931–954.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, R.J. and R. Blundell (1986): An Exogeneity Test for a Simultaneous Equation Tobit Model with an Application to Labor Supply, Econometrica, 54, 679–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tukey, J. (1958): Bias and Confidence in Not-Quite Large Samples, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29, 614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vella, F. (1993): A Simple Estimator for Simultaneous Models with Censored Endogenous Regressors, International Economic Review, 34, 441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vella, F. (1998): Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey, Journal of Human Resources, 33, 127–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vella, F. and M. Verbeek (1998): Whose Wages Do Unions Raise? A Dynamic Model of Unionism and Wage Rate Determination for Young Men, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 13, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vella, F. and M. Verbeek (1999): Two-Step Estimation of Panel Data Models with Censored Endogenous Regressors and Selection Bias, Journal of Econometrics, 90, 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Verbeek, M. and T.E. Nijman (1996): Incomplete Panels and Selection Bias, in L. Matyas and P. Sevestre, eds., The Econometrics of Panel Data. Handbook of the Theory with Applications, 2nd edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 449–490.Google Scholar
  50. Waterman, R., B. Lindsay, H. Li and B. Li (2000): Projected Score Methods for Nuisance Parameters: Asymptotics and Neyman-Scott Problems, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  51. Wooldridge, J.M. (1995): Selection Corrections for Panel Data Models Under Conditional Mean Independence Assumptions, Journal of Econometrics, 68, 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wooldridge, J.M. (2002): Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  53. Wooldridge, J.M. (2005): Simple Solutions to the Initial Conditions Problem in Dynamic, Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Woutersen, T.M. (2002): Robustness Against Incidental Parameters, unpublished manuscript, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo Honoré
    • 1
  • Francis Vella
    • 2
  • Marno Verbeek
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsGeorgetown UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Department of Financial ManagementRSM Erasmus University, Burg3062 PA RotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations