Abstract
Automatic classification of neurological tissues is a first step to many structural analysis pipelines. Most computational approaches are designed to extract the best possible classification results out of MR data acquired with standard clinical protocols. We observe that the characteristics of the latter owe more to the historical circumstances under which they were developed and the visual appreciation of the radiographer who acquires the images than to the optimality with which they can be classified with an automatic algorithm.
We submit that better performances could be obtained by considering the acquisition and analysis processes conjointly rather than optimising them independently. Here, we propose such a joint approach to MR tissue classification in the form of a fast MR sequence, which nulls the magnitude and changes the sign of the phase at the boundary between tissue types. A simple phase-based thresholding algorithm then suffices to segment the tissues. Preliminary results show promises to simplify and shorten the overall classification process.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Toga, A., Mazziotta, J.: Brain Mapping: The Methods. Academic Press, London (2002)
Thompson, P., Hayashi, K., de Zubicaray, G., Janke, A., Rose, S., Semple, J., Hong, M., Herman, D., Gravano, D., Dittmer, S., Doddrell, D., Toga, A.: Dynamics of Gray Matter Loss in Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Neuroscience 23, 994–1005 (2003)
Fischl, B., Dale, A.: Measuring the Thickness of the Human Cerebral Cortex from Magnetic Resonance Images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97, 11044–11049 (2000)
Stoeckel, J., Malandain, G., Migneco, O., Koulibaly, P., Robert, P., Ayache, N., Darcourt, J.: Classification of SPECT Images of Normal Subjects versus Images of Alzheimer’s Disease Patients. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2001. LNCS, vol. 2208, pp. 666–674. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Ashburner, J., Friston, K.: Voxel-based morphometry: the methods. NeuroImage 11, 805–821 (2000)
Warfield, S.K.: Fast k-NN classification for multichannel image data. Pattern Recognition Letters 17, 713–721 (1996)
Collins, D.L., Zijdenbos, A.P., Baaré, W.F.C., Evans, A.C.: ANIMAL+INSECT: Improved Cortical Structure Segmentation. In: Proc. of IPMI 1999, pp. 210–223 (1999)
Held, K., Kops, E., Krause, B., Wells, W., Kikinis, R., Müller-Gärtner, H.: Markov random field segmentation of brain MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 16 (1997)
Leemput, K.V., Maes, F., Suetens, P.: Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain. IEEE trans. on medical imaging 18, 897–908 (1999)
Zhang, Y., Brady, M., Smith, S.: Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE trans. on medical imaging 20, 45–57 (2001)
Pham, D., Xu, C., Prince, J.: Current Methods in Medical Image Segmentation. Annual Reviews 2, 315–337 (1996)
Dugas-Phocion, G., Lebrun, C., Chanalet, S., Chatel, M., Ayache, N., Malandain, G.: Automatic segmentation of white matter lesions in multi-sequence MRI of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. In: ECTRIMS, Thessaloniki, Greece (2005)
Brant-Zawadzki, M., Gillan, G., Nitz, W.: MP RAGE: a three-dimensional, T1-weighted, gradient-echo sequence– initial experience in the brain. Radiology 182, 769–775 (1992)
Xu, W., Cumming, I.: A region growing algorithm for insar phase unwrapping. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing 37, 124–134 (1999)
Haacke, E., Xu, Y., Cheng, Y., Reichenbach, J.: Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magnetic Resonance Imaging 52, 612–618 (2004)
Collins, D., Zijdenbos, A., Kollokian, V., Sled, J., Kabani, N., Holmes, C., Evans, A.: Design and Construction of a Realistic Digital Brain Phantom. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 26, 463–468 (1998)
Dice, L.: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26, 297–302 (1945)
Warfield, S.K., Zou, K.H., Wells, W.M.: Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23, 903–921 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pitiot, A., Totman, J., Gowland, P. (2007). Null Point Imaging: A Joint Acquisition/Analysis Paradigm for MR Classification. In: Ayache, N., Ourselin, S., Maeder, A. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2007. MICCAI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4791. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75757-3_92
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75757-3_92
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75756-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75757-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)