Skip to main content

ATP Cross-Verification of the Mizar MPTP Challenge Problems

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4790))

Abstract

Mizar is a proof assistant used for formalization and mechanical verification of mathematics. The main use of Mizar is in the development of the Mizar Mathematical Library (MML), in which proofs are verified by the Mizar proof checker. The Mizar proof checker has a quite complex implementation, and also lacks the ability to print out detailed atomic proof steps in a format that is easy to verify by an independent proof-checking tool. This can raise concerns about the correctness of the MML. This paper describes how a Mizar-to-ATP translation (the MPTP system), ATP verification tools (the GDV system), and Automated Theorem Proving (ATP) systems, have been used for an independent cross-verification of a part of the MML.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bertot, Y., Dowek, G., Hirschowitz, A., Paulin, C., Théry, L. (eds.): TPHOLs 1999. LNCS, vol. 1690. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Claessen, K., Sorensson, N.: New Techniques that Improve MACE-style Finite Model Finding. In: Baumgartner, P., Fermueller, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the CADE-19 Workshop: Model Computation - Principles, Algorithms, Applications (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, M.: Obvious logical inferences. In: Hayes, P.J. (ed.) IJCAI, pp. 530–531. William Kaufmann (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denney, E., Fischer, B., Schumann, J.: An empirical evaluation of automated theorem provers in software certification. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 15(1), 81–108 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds.): IJCAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4130, pp. 17–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hales, T.C.: Formalizing the proof of the kepler conjecture. In: Slind, K., Bunker, A., Gopalakrishnan, G.C. (eds.) TPHOLs 2004. LNCS, vol. 3223, p. 117. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harrison, J.: A Mizar Mode for HOL. In: von Wright, J., Harrison, J., Grundy, J. (eds.) TPHOLs 1996. LNCS, vol. 1125, pp. 203–220. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaskowski, S.: On the rules of suppositions. Studia Logica 1 (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  9. McLaughlin, S.: An interpretation of Isabelle/HOL in HOL Light. In: Furbach and Shankar [FS06], pp. 192–204

    Google Scholar 

  10. McCune, W., Shumsky, O.: System description: IVY. In: McAllester, D. (ed.) Automated Deduction - CADE-17. LNCS, vol. 1831, pp. 401–405. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Naumowicz, A., Bylinski, C.: Basic elements of computer algebra in MIZAR. Mechanized Mathematics and Its Applications 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Naumowicz, A., Bylinski, C.: Improving mizar texts with properties and requirements. In: Asperti, A., Bancerek, G., Trybulec, A. (eds.) MKM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3119, pp. 290–301. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Obua, S., Skalberg, S.: Importing HOL into Isabelle/HOL. In: Furbach and Shankar [FS06], pp. 298–302

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pelletier, F.J.: A brief history of natural deduction. History and Philosophy of Logic 20, 1–31 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Rudnicki, P., Trybulec, A.: On equivalents of well-foundedness. J. Autom. Reasoning 23(3-4), 197–234 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Rudnicki, P.: Obvious inferences. J. Autom. Reasoning 3(4), 383–393 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Rudnicki, P.: An overview of the Mizar project. In: 1992 Workshop on Types for Proofs and Programs, Chalmers University of Technology, Bastad, pp. 311–332 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Riazanov, A., Voronkov, A.: The design and implementation of VAMPIRE. Journal of AI Communications 15(2-3), 91–110 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Schulz, S.: E – a brainiac theorem prover. Journal of AI Communications 15(2-3), 111–126 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Sutcliffe, G., Suttner, C.B.: The TPTP problem library: CNF release v1.2.1. Journal of Automated Reasoning 21(2), 177–203 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sutcliffe, G.: Semantic Derivation Verification. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 15(6), 1053–1070 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Syme, D.: Three tactic theorem proving. In: Bertot et al. [BDH+99], pp. 203–220

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sutcliffe, G., Zimmer, J., Schulz, S.: TSTP Data-Exchange Formats for Automated Theorem Proving Tools. In: Sorge, V., Zhang, W. (eds.) Distributed and Multi-Agent Reasoning. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Urban, J.: MPTP - motivation, implementation, first experiments. Journal of Automated Reasoning 33(3-4), 319–339 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Urban, J.: MPTP 0.2: Design, implementation, and initial experiments. J. Autom. Reasoning 37(1-2), 21–43 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Urban, J.: XML-izing Mizar: making semantic processing and presentation of MML easy. In: Kohlhase, M. (ed.) MKM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3863, pp. 346–360. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Urban, J.: MaLARea: a metasystem for automated reasoning in large theories. In: Sutcliffe, G., Urban, J., Schulz, S. (eds.) ESARLT: Empirically Successful Automated Reasoning in Large Theories. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR, vol. 257, pp. 45–58 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Urban, J., Trac, S., Sutcliffe, G., Puzis, Y.: Combining Mizar and TPTP semantic presentation tools. In: Proceedings of the Mathematical User-Interfaces Workshop 2007 (2007), http://www.activemath.org/workshops/MathUI/07/proceedings/Urban-etal-MizarIDV.html

  29. Weidenbach, C., Brahm, U., Hillenbrand, T., Keen, E., Theobald, C., Topic, D.: SPASS version 2.0. In: CADE, pp. 275–279 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wenzel, M.: Isar - a generic interpretative approach to readable formal proof documents. In: Bertot et al. [BDH+99], pp. 167–184

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wiedijk, F.: CHECKER - notes on the basic inference step in Mizar (2000), available at http://www.cs.kun.nl/~freek/mizar/by.dvi

  32. Zammit, V.: On the implementation of an extensible declarative proof language. In: Bertot et al. [BDH+99], pp. 185–202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Nachum Dershowitz Andrei Voronkov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Urban, J., Sutcliffe, G. (2007). ATP Cross-Verification of the Mizar MPTP Challenge Problems. In: Dershowitz, N., Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning. LPAR 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4790. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75560-9_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75560-9_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75558-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75560-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics