Abstract
Social influences play an important part in the actions that an individual agent may perform within a multi-agent society. However, the incomplete knowledge and the diverse and conflicting influences present within such societies, may stop an agent from abiding by all its social influences. This may, in turn, lead to conflicts that the agents need to identify, manage, and resolve in order for the society to behave in a coherent manner. To this end, we present an empirical study of an argumentation-based negotiation (ABN) approach that allows the agents to detect such conflicts, and then manage and resolve them through the use of argumentative dialogues. To test our theory, we map our ABN model to a multi-agent task allocation scenario. Our results show that using an argumentation approach allows agents to both efficiently and effectively manage their social influences even under high degrees of incompleteness. Finally, we show that allowing agents to argue and resolve such conflicts early in the negotiation encounter increases their efficiency in managing social influences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Reaching agreement through argumentation: A possibilistic approach. In: Dubois, D., Welty, C.A., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) KR 2004, pp. 175–182 (2004)
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action. In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3366, pp. 149–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Castelfranchi, C.: Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations. In: ICMAS 1995, pp. 41–48 (1995)
Cavedon, L., Sonenberg, L.: On social commitment, roles and preferred goals. In: ICMAS 1998, pp. 80–86 (1998)
Dignum, F., Morley, D., Sonenberg, E.A., Cavedon, L.: Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Multi-agent Systems, Boston, USA, pp. 111–118 (2000)
Dignum, V., Kinny, D., Sonenberg, L.: Motivational attitudes of agents: On desires, obligations and norms. In: Dunin-Keplicz, B., Nawarecki, E. (eds.) CEEMAS 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2296, pp. 61–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Esteva, M., Rodríguez, J.A., Sierra, C., Garcia, P., Arcos, J.L.: On the formal specifications of electronic institutions. In: Sierra, C., Dignum, F.P.M. (eds.) Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1991, pp. 126–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Fornara, N.: Interaction and Communication among Autonomous Agents in Multiagent Systems. Phd thesis, Universitá della Svizzera italiana, Facoltá di Scienze della Comunicazione (2003)
Karunatillake, N.C.: Argumentation-Based Negotiation in a Social Context. PhD thesis, School of Electronics and Computer Science (2006)
Karunatillake, N.C., Jennings, N.R.: Is it worth arguing? In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3366, pp. 234–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Karunatillake, N.C., Jennings, N.R., Rahwan, I., Norman, T.J.: Arguing and negotiating in the presence of social influences. In: Pěchouček, M., Petta, P., Varga, L.Z. (eds.) CEEMAS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3690, pp. 223–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Karunatillake, N.C., Jennings, N.R., Rahwan, I., Norman, T.J.: Argument-based negotiation in a social context. In: Parsons, S., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4049, pp. 74–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 104(1-2), 1–69 (1998)
McBurney, P., van Eijk, R., Parsons, S., Amgoud, L.: A dialogue-game protocol for agent purchase negotiations. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 7(3), 235–273 (2003)
Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L.: Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4), 343–375 (2003)
Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C.: Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: A rhetorical approach. In: Computational Models of Natural Argument, IJCAI, pp. 9–18 (2003)
Ross, A.: Imperatives and logic. Theoria 7, 53–71 (1941)
Sandholm, T.W., Lesser, V.R.: Advantages of a leveled commitment contracting protocol. In: AAAI 1996, OR, USA, pp. 126–133 (1996)
Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R., Noriega, P., Parsons, S.: A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: Rao, A., Singh, M.P., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) ATAL 1997. LNCS, vol. 1365, pp. 177–192. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
van der Torre, L., Tan, Y.-H.: Contrary-to-duty reasoning with preference-based dyadic obligations. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 27(1-4), 49–78 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Karunatillake, N.C., Jennings, N.R., Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D. (2007). Managing Social Influences Through Argumentation-Based Negotiation. In: Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4766. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75526-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75526-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75525-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75526-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)