Skip to main content

Verification of Model Transformations: A Case Study with BPEL

  • Conference paper
Book cover Trustworthy Global Computing (TGC 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4661))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Model transformations, like refinement or refactoring, have to respect the semantics of the models transformed. In the case of behavioural models this semantics can be specified by transformations, too, describing an abstract interpreter for the language. Both kinds of transformations, if given in a rule-based way, can formally be described as graph transformations.

In this paper, we present executable business processes, their operational semantics and refactoring, as an example of this fact. Using results from graph transformation theory about critical pairs and local confluence, we show that our transformations preserve the semantics of processes. The analysis is performed by means of the graph transformation tool AGG.

Work supported in part by the IST-2005-16004 Integrated Project SENSORIA: Software Engineering for Service-Oriented Overlay Computers and by the European Community’s Human Potential Programme under contract HPRN-CT-2002-00275, [SegraVis].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso, G., Fiedler, U., Hagen, C., Lazcano, A., Schuldt, H., Weiler, N.: WISE: Business to business e-commerce. In: RIDE, pp. 132–139 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anyanwu, K., Sheth, A., Cardoso, J., Miller, J., Kochut, K.: Healthcare enterprise process development and integration. Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology, 35(2) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baresi, L., Maurino, A., Modafferi, S.: Workflow partitioning in mobile information systems. In: Kluwer (ed.) Proc. of IFIP TC8 Working Conference on Mobile Information Systems. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol. 158 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baresi, L., Maurino, A., Modafferi, S.: Partitioning rules for bpel processes. Technical report, Politecnico di Milano. In preparation (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chafle, G.B., Chandra, S., Mann, V., Nanda, M.G.: Decentralized orchestration of composite web services. In: Proc. of the Int. World Wide Web conference on Alternate track papers & posters, pp. 134–143. ACM Press, New York, USA (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen, E., Curbera, F., Meredith, G., Weerawarana, S.: Web Services Description Language (WSDL) version 1.1. W3C (March 2001), http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl

  7. Eder, J., Panagos, E.: Towards distributed workflow process management. In: proc. of Workshop on cross-Organizational Workflow Management and Coordination, San Francisco, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K.: Overview of Formal Concepts for Model Transformations based on Typed Attributed Graph Transformation. In: Proc. International Workshop on Graph and Model Transformation (GraMoT 2005). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 152, Elsevier Science, Tallinn, Estonia (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., Prange, U., Taentzer, G.: Fundamentals of Algebraic Graph Transformation. EATCS Monographs in Theoretical Computer Science. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Engels, G., Heckel, R., Sauer, St.: Dynamic meta modeling: A graphical approach to operational semantics. In: Proc. OOPSLA 1999 Workshop on Rigorous Modeling and Analysis with the UML: Challenges and Limitations, Denver, CO, USA (November 2, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gardner, T., al.: Draft UML 1.4 profile for automated business processes with a mapping to the BPEL 1.0. IBM alphaWorks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grefen, P., Aberer, K., Hoffner, Y., Ludwig, H.: Crossflow: Cross-organizational workflow management in dynamic virtual enterprises. International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering 15(5), 277–290 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. IBM, BEA Systems, Microsoft, SAP AG, Siebel Systems. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services version 1.1 (May 2003), http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-bpel/

  14. Jablonski, S., Bussler, C.: Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture and Implementation. International Thomson (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jablonski, S., Schamburger, R., Hahn, C., Horn, S., Lay, R., Neeb, J., Schlundt, M.: A comprehensive investigation of distribution in the context of workflow management. In: proc. of International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems ICPADS, Kyongju City, Korea (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Judge, D., Odgers, B., Shepherdson, J., Cui, Z.: Agent enhanced workflow. BT Technical Journal (16) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lambers, L., Ehrig, H., Orejas, F.: Conflict Detection for Graph Transformation with Negative Application Conditions. In: Corradini, A., Ehrig, H., Montanari, U., Ribeiro, L., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) ICGT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4178, pp. 61–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohan, C., Alonso, G., Gunthor, R., Kamath, M.: Exotica: A research perspective of workflow management systems. Data Engineering Bulletin 18(1), 19–26 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muth, P., Wodtke, D., Weisenfels, J., Kotz Dittrich, A., Weikum, G.: From centralized workflow specification to distributed workflow execution. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10(2), 159–184 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Adeptflex − supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10(2), 93–129 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riempp, G.: Wide Area Workflow Management. Springer, London, UK (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taentzer, G.: AGG: A Graph Transformation Environment for Modeling and Validation of Software. In: Pfaltz, J.L., Nagl, M., Boehlen, B. (eds.) AGTIVE 2003. LNCS, vol. 3062, pp. 446–456. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Technical University of Berlin, Department of Computer Science. AGG Version 1.4.1 - (2006), http://tfs.cs.tu-berlin.de/agg

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ugo Montanari Donald Sannella Roberto Bruni

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baresi, L., Ehrig, K., Heckel, R. (2007). Verification of Model Transformations: A Case Study with BPEL. In: Montanari, U., Sannella, D., Bruni, R. (eds) Trustworthy Global Computing. TGC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4661. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75336-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75336-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75333-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75336-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics