Skip to main content

Long-Term Preservation of Digital Archives

  • Chapter
Book cover eCulture
  • 1467 Accesses

Abstract

In the last few decades we have witnessed two related processes: the increasingly visible inclusion of electronic devices in our everyday lives, and the rush to digital formats. Institutions, organisations and private companies have begun to convert their own archives into digital formats. The general public has also started to convert personal data into digital formats: documents, music, movies, drawings and photos have been converted from their original formats into bitstreams in digital media. People used to believe (and many still do) that digital formats were the ultimate formats for storing information indefinitely. The idea that texts, images and artefacts can be perpetuated by converting them into digital form is popular and widely supported/sponsored. As a result, a significant amount of our future heritage, our legacy to future generations, relies on digital technology. But is digital technology really suitable for long-term preservation? And are electronic devices, which are required in order to experience information stored in digital formats, durable enough to guarantee future access to this information? If not, what can we do to overcome this problem?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • D. Bearman (1999) Reality and chimeras in the preservation of electronic records. D-Lib Mag. 5(4) (see http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april99/bearman/bearman-notes.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Bearman, K. Sochats (1996) Metadata requirements for evidence. University of Pittsburgh, PA (see http://web.archive.org/web/20000819132426/www.sis.pitt.edu/~nhprc/BACartic.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (2001) Reference model for an open archival information system (OAIS). CCSDS, Reston, VA (see http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf or http://public.ccsds.org/publications/RefModel.aspx)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Duranti, K. Eastwood (2002) The preservation of the integrity of electronic records. Kluwer, Dordrecht (see http://www.interpares.org/UBCProject/index.htm)

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2002) DigiCULT Report: Technological landscapes for tomorrow’s cultural economy: Unlocking the value of cultural heritage. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (ISBN 92-828-6265-8; see http://www.salzburgresearch.at/fbi/digicult)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young (1996) Keeping electronic records forever: Records management; Vision development. Public Record Office Victoria, North Melbourne (see http://www.prov.vic.gov.au/vers/pdf/kerf.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young/CSIRO (1998) Victorian electronic record strategy (final report). Public Record Office Victoria, North Melbourne, ISBN 0-7311-5520-3 (see http://www.prov.vic.gov.au/vers/pdf/final.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst & Young/CSIRO/Public Record Office Victoria (2007) Management of electronic records, Public Record Office Standard (PROS) 99/007. Public Record Office Victoria, North Melbourne (see http://www.prov.vic.gov.au/vers/standard)

    Google Scholar 

  • Functional requirements for evidence in recordkeeping. School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, PA (see http://www.archimuse.com/papers/nhprc)

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Granger (2000) Emulation as a digital preservation strategy. D-Lib Magazine, October 2000 (see http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october00/granger/10granger.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Guercio (2004) La conservazione a lungo termine dei documenti elettronici: normativa italiana e progetti internazionali. In: Proc. 3 Conf. Organizz. Arch. Univ. Italiane, Padova, Italy, 5–6 April 2001 (see http://www.unipd.it/archivio/conferenze/3conferenza/3%20Conf%20-%20Mariella%20Guercio.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hedstrom (1997) Research issues in migration and long-term preservation. Arch. Mus. Informatics 11(3–4):287– 292 (http://www.springerlink.com/content/w4624u883j075261)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.R. Heminger, S.B. Robertson (2000) The digital Rosetta Stone: a model for maintaining long-term access to static digital documents. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 3:2

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Lavoie (2000) Meeting the challenges of digital preservation: The OAIS reference model. OCLC Newslett. Jan./Feb. 2000:26–30

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Levy (1998) Heroic measures: Reflections on the possibility and purpose of digital preservation. In: Proc. 3rd ACM Conf. on Digital Libraries, Pittsburgh, PA, 23–26 June 1998, pp 152–161

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Lorie (2001) Long-term preservation of digital information. In: Proc. 1st ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conf. on Digital Libraries, Roanoke, VA, January 2001, pp 346–352

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Lynch (1999) Canonicalization: A fundamental tool to facilitate preservation and management of digital information. D-Lib Mag. Sept. 1999 (see http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september99/09lynch.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Archives of Australia (1995) Keeping electronic records (policy for electronic recordkeeping in the Commonwealth Government). National Archives of Australia, Canberra (see http://www.naa.gov.au/images/digital-recordkeeping-guidelines_tcm2-920.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Archives of Australia (1999) Recordkeeping Metadata Standard for Commonwealth Agencies, version 1.0. National Archives of Australia, Canberra (see http://www.naa.gov.au/images/rkms_pt1_2_tcm2-1036.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Archives of Australia and Office for Government Online (1999) The Australian Government Locator Service (AGLS) Manual for Users, Version 1.1. National Archives of Australia and Office for Government Online, Canberra (see http://www.naa.gov.au/records-management/create-capture-describe/describe/AGLS/index.aspx or http://www.naa.gov.au/records-management/publications/AGLS-Element.aspx)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Archives Washington and San Diego Supercomputer Center: http://www.npaci.edu

    Google Scholar 

  • National Library of Australia (1999b) Preservation metadata for digital collections. National Library of Australia, Canberra (see http://www.nla.gov.au/preserve/pmeta.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1995) Study on the long-term retention of selected scientific and technical records of the Federal Government Working Papers. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Networked European Deposit Library (2000) Metadata for long term preservation. NEDLIB, The Hague, The Netherlands (see http://nedlib.kb.nl/results/NEDLIBmetadata.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • OAIS standard: http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • OCLC/RLG Working Group on Preservation Metadata (2001) A recommendation for content information. OCLC, Dublin, OH (see http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/pmwg/pm_framework.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Reich, D.S.H. Rosenthal (2001) LOCKSS: A permanent web publishing and access system. D-Lib Mag. June 2001 (see http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june01/reich/06reich.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Library Group (1998) RLG REACH element set for shared description of museum objects. RLG/OCLC, Dublin, OH (see http://www.oclc.org/programs/ourwork/past/museumresources/reach.htm)

    Google Scholar 

  • Resource Description Framework (RDF) model and syntax specification: http://www.w3.org/RDF

    Google Scholar 

  • RLG-OCLC Working Group (2001) Attributes of a trusted digital repository: Meeting the needs of research resources (report; draft for public comment). OCLC, Dublin, OH (see http://www.oclc.org/programs/ourwork/past/trustedrep/attributes01.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • A.M. Ronchi (2004) From Hammurabi Codex to Rosetta Stone. Long term preservation of digital archives. Proc. CIDOC 2004, St. Petersburg, Russia (see: http://confifap.cpic.ru/upload/spb2004/reports/dokladEn_172.doc)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rothenberg (1995) Ensuring the longevity of digital documents. Sci. Am. 272(1):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Rothenberg (1999) Avoiding technological quicksand: Finding a viable technical foundation for digital preservation. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC (ISBN 1-887334-63-7; see http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Shepard, D. MacCarn (1998) The Universal Preservation Format: Background and fundamentals. In: Sixth DELOS Workshop: Preservation of Digital Information, Tomar, Portugal, 17–19 June 1998 (see http:/www.ercim.org/publication/ws-proceedings/DELOS6/upf.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia (1996) Australian standard on records management, AS4390-1996. Standards Australia, Homebush, NSW (ISBN 0-7337-0306-2)

    Google Scholar 

  • State Records NSW (1995) Documenting the future (policy and strategies for electronic recordkeeping in the New South Wales public sector). State Records NSW, Kingswood (ISBN 07310-5038-X; see http://www.records.nsw.gov.au/recordkeeping/policy_on_electronic_recordkeeping_6879.asp or http://www.records.nsw.gov.au/recordkeeping/docs%
5CPolicy%20on%20Electronic%20Recordkeeping.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information (1996) Preserving digital information (report). Commission on Preservation and Access and The Research Libraries Group, Inc., Washington, DC (see http://www.oclc.org/programs/ourwork/past/digpresstudy/final-report.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Defense Standard 5015.2 (Design Criteria Standard For Electronic Records Management Software Applications): http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/recmgt

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Waugh, R. Wilkinson, B. Hills, J. Dell’oro (2000) Preserving digital information forever. In ACM 2000 digital libraries: proceedings of the fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, June 2-7, 2000, San Antonio, Texas, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 175-184. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1456476

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Weibel, J. Kunze, C. Lagoze, M. Wolfe (1998) Dublin Core metadata for resource discovery (RFC 2413): ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2413.txt

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Wheatley (2001) Migration: a CAMiLEON discussion paper (Ariadne 29): http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue29/camileon

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Yergeau (1998) UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646 (RFC 2279): http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2279.txt

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Long-Term Preservation of Digital Archives. In: eCulture. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75276-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics