Skip to main content

Measures of Ruleset Quality Capable to Represent Uncertain Validity

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4724))

  • 1192 Accesses

Abstract

The paper deals with quality measures of rules extracted from data, more precisely with measures of the whole extracted rulesets. Three particular approaches to extending ruleset quality measures from classification to general rulesets are discussed, and one of them, capable to represent uncertain validity of rulesets for objects, is elaborated in some detail. In particular, a generalization of ROC curves is proposed. The approach is illustrated on rulesets extracted with four important methods from the well-known iris data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hand, D.: Construction and Assessment of Classification Rules. John Wiley and Sons, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Fürnkranz, J., Flach, P.: ROC ‘n’ rule learning – towards a better understanding of covering algorithms. Machine Learning 58, 39–77 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaufman, K., Michalski, R.: An adjustable description quality measure for pattern discovery using the AQ methodology. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 14, 199–216 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McGarry, K.: A survey of interestingness measures for knowledge discovery. Knowledge Engineering Review 20, 39–61 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois, D., Hüllermeier, P.H.: A systematic approach to the assessment of fuzzy association rules. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 13, 167–192 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Geng, L., Hamilton, H.: Choosing the right lens: Finding what is interesting in data mining. In: Guillet, F., Hamilton, H. (eds.) Quality Measures in Data Mining, pp. 3–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Lallich, S., Teytaud, O., Prudhomme, E.: Association rule interestingness: Measure and statistical validation. In: Guillet, F., Hamilton, H. (eds.) Quality Measures in Data Mining, pp. 251–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bay, S., Pazzani, M.: Detecting group differences. mining contrast sets. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 5, 213–246 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hilderman, R., Peckham, T.: Statistical methodologies for mining potentially interesting contrast sets. In: Guillet, F., Hamilton, H. (eds.) Quality Measures in Data Mining, pp. 153–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lerman, L., Azè, J.: Une mesure probabiliste contextuelle discriminante de qualite des règles d’association. In: EGC 2003: Extraction et Gestion des Connaissances, pp. 247–263. Hermes Science Publications, Lavoisier (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lenca, P., Vaiilant, B., Meyer, P., Lalich, S.: Association rule interestingness meaures: Experimental and theoretical studies. In: Guillet, F., Hamilton, H. (eds.) Quality Measures in Data Mining, pp. 51–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Hájek, P., Havránek, T.: Mechanizing Hypothesis Formation. Springer, Berlin (1978)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Agrawal, R., Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H., Verkamo, A.: Fast discovery of association rules. In: Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 307–328. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zaki, M., Parathasarathy, S., Ogihara, M., Li, W.: New parallel algorithms for fast discovery of association rules. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 1, 343–373 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Korn, F., Labrinidis, A., Kotidis, Y., Faloutsos, C.: Quantifiable data mining using ration rules. VLDB Journal 8, 254–266 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Michalski, R.: Knowledge acquisition through conceptual clustering: A theoretical framework and algorithm for partitioning data into conjunctive concepts. International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information Systems 4, 219–243 (1980)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Michalski, R., Kaufman, K.: Learning patterns in noisy data. In: Machine Learning and Its Applications, pp. 22–38. Springer, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark, P., Boswell, R.: Rule induction with CN2: Some recent improvements. In: Kodratoff, Y. (ed.) Machine Learning - EWSL 1991, vol. 482, pp. 151–163. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. De Raedt, L.: Interactive Theory Revision: An Inductive Logic Programming Approach. Academic Press, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Muggleton, S.: Inductive Logic Programming. Academic Press, London (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Freitas, A.: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery with Evolutionary Algorithms. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Jang, J.: ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 23, 665–685 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jang, J., Sun, C.: Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control. The Proceedings of the IEEE 83, 378–406 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nauck, D., Kruse, R.: NEFCLASS-X: A neuro-fuzzy tool to build readable fuzzy classifiers. BT Technology Journal 3, 180–192 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nauck, D.: Fuzzy data analysis with NEFCLASS. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 32, 103–130 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Holeňa, M.: Fuzzy hypotheses for Guha implications. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 98, 101–125 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Holeňa, M.: Fuzzy hypotheses testing in the framework of fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 145, 229–252 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Novák, V., Perfilieva, I., Dvořák, A., Chen, C., Wei, Q., Yan, P.: Mining pure linguistic associations from numerical data. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., Stone, C.: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, Belmont (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Quinlan, J.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Finn, G.: Learning fuzzy rules from data. Neural Computing & Applications 8, 9–24 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Duch, W., Adamczak, R., Grabczewski, K.: A new methodology of extraction, optimization and application of crisp and fuzzy logical rules. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 11, 277–306 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tsukimoto, H.: Extracting rules from trained neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 11, 333–389 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Holeňa, M.: Piecewise-linear neural networks and their relationship to rule extraction from data. Neural Computation 18, 2813–2853 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Tickle, A., Andrews, R., Golea, M., Diederich, J.: The truth will come to light: Directions and challenges in extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 9, 1057–1068 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mitra, S., Hayashi, Y.: Neuro-fuzzy rule generation: Survey in soft computing framework. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 11, 748–768 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Šimunek, M.: Academic KDD project LISp-miner. In: Abraham, A., Franke, K., Koppen, K. (eds.) Advances in Soft Computing – Systems Desing and Applications, pp. 263–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hájek, P., Holeňa, M.: Formal logics of discovery and hypothesis formation by machine. Theoretical Computer Science 292, 345–357 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Holeňa, M.: Extraction of fuzzy logic rules from data by means of artificial neural networks. Kybernetika 41, 297–314 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Holeňa, M.: Neural networks for extraction of fuzzy logic rules with application to EEG data. In: Ribeiro, B., Albrecht, R., Dobnikar, A. (eds.) Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms, pp. 369–372. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Fisher, R.: The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics 7, 179–188 (1936)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Holeňa, M. (2007). Measures of Ruleset Quality Capable to Represent Uncertain Validity. In: Mellouli, K. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4724. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75255-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75256-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics