Skip to main content

Cautious Conjunctive Merging of Belief Functions

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4724))

Abstract

When merging belief functions, Dempster rule of combination is justified only when information sources can be considered as independent. When this is not the case, one must find out a cautious merging rule that adds a minimal amount of information to the inputs. Such a rule is said to follow the principle of minimal commitment. Some conditions it should comply with are studied. A cautious merging rule based on maximizing expected cardinality of the resulting belief function is proposed. It recovers the minimum operation when specialized to possibility distributions. This form of the minimal commitment principle is discussed, in particular its discriminating power and its justification when some conflict is present between the belief functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baudrit, C., Dubois, D.: Practical representations of incomplete probabilistic knowledge. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 51(1), 86–108 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cattaneo, M.: Combining belief functions issued from dependent sources. In: Proc. Third International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Application (ISIPTA 2003), Lugano, Switzerland, pp. 133–147 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chateauneuf, A.: Combination of compatible belief functions and relation of specificity. In: Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence, pp. 97–114. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dempster, A.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38, 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Denoeux, T.: Conjunctive and disjunctive combination of belief functions induced by non distinct bodies of evidence. Artificial Intelligence (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Destercke, S., Dubois, D.: A unified view of some representations of imprecise probabilities. In: Lawry, J., Miranda, E., Bugarin, A., Li, S. (eds.) Int. Conf. on Soft Methods in Probability and Statistics (SMPS), Advances in Soft Computing, Bristol, pp. 249–257. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: A set-theoretic view on belief functions: logical operations and approximations by fuzzy sets. I. J. of General Systems 12, 193–226 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubois, D., Yager, R.: Fuzzy set connectives as combination of belief structures. Information Sciences 66, 245–275 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferson, S., Ginzburg, L., Kreinovich, V., Myers, D., Sentz, K.: Constructing probability boxes and dempster-shafer structures. Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shafer, G.: A mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Smets, P.: The canonical decomposition of a weighted belief. In: Proc. Int. Joint, Montreal, pp. 1896–1901 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smets, P.: Quantified possibility theory seen as an hyper cautious transferable belief model. In: Proceedings LFA 2000, La Rochelle. Cepadues-Editions Toulouse, pp. 343–353 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smets, P.: Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions. Information Fusion 8, 387–412 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The transferable belief model. Artificial Intelligence 66, 191–234 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Walley, P.: Statistical reasoning with imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, Sydney (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy sets and systems 1, 3–28 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Destercke, S., Dubois, D., Chojnacki, E. (2007). Cautious Conjunctive Merging of Belief Functions. In: Mellouli, K. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4724. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75255-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75256-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics