Classification Accuracy in Local Optimal Strategy of Multistage Recognition with Fuzzy Data

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 45)


The paper deals with the multistage recognition task. In this problem of recognition the Bayesian statistic is applied. The decision rules minimize the mean risk, that is the mean value of the zero-one loss function. The information on objects features is fuzzy or non-fuzzy. The probability of misclassification for local optimal strategy and the difference between probability of misclassification for the both information’s are presented. Simple example of this difference conclude the work.


Decision Rule Fuzzy Number Fuzzy Triangular Number Bayesian Statistic Fuzzy Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Berger J O (1985) Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. SpringerVerlag, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burduk R (2004) Decision Rules for Bayesian Hierarchical Classifier with Fuzzy Factor. Soft Methodology and Random Information Systems, Advances in Soft Computing. 519–526Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burduk R (2005) Probability of Misclassification in Bayesian Hierarchical Classifier. Soft Methodology and Random Information Systems, Advances in Soft Computing. 341–348Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casals M R, Gil M A, Gil P (1986) On the Use of Zadeh’s Probabilistic Definition for Testing Statistical Hypotheses from Fuzzy Information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20, 175–190zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gertner G Z, Zhu H (1996) Bayesian Estimation in Forest Surveys when Samples or Priori Information Are Fuzzy. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 77, 277–290zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grzegorzewski P (2000) Testing Statistical Hypotheses with Vague Data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 112, 501–510zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hung W L (2001) Bootstrap Method for Some Estimators Based on Fuzzy Data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 119, 337–341CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Janickow C Z (1998) Fuzzy Decision Trees: Issues and Methods. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics B: Cybernetics 28, 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kurzyriski M (1983) Decision Rules for a Hierarchical Classifier. Pattern Recognition Letters 1, 305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kurzyriski M (1988) On the Multistage Bayes Classifier. Pattern Recognition 21, 355–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Möller B, Beer M (2004) Fuzzy Randomness. Springer-Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pedrycz W (1990) Fuzzy Sets in Pattern Recognition: Methodology and Methods. Pattern Recognition 23, 121–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wozniak M (2004) Proposition of Boosting Algorithm for Probabilistic Decision Support System. LNCS 3036, 675–678MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Viertl R (1996) Statistical Methods for Non-Precise Data. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yao J S, Hwang C M (1996) Point Estimation for the n Sizes of Random Sample with One Vague Data. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 80, 205–215zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zadeh L A (1968) Probability Measures of Fuzzy Events. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 23, 421–427zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Systems and Computer NetworksWroclaw University of TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations