Abstract
The aim of the present paper is to investigate the possibility for Western tense theories to be applied successfully to the description of the Georgian tense system. Georgian tense is extremely complex because the Georgian language is agglutinative which means that semantic information which is scattered over the sentence in Germanic and Romance languages is expressed by a morphologically very complex verbal form that has many other duties to fulfill apart from expressing temporal information. It will be argued that the binary tense system as developed in [8] and modernized in [9] is indeed applicable and, after an extension, may even explain in a sufficient degree of depth why Georgian tense is expressed as it is, especially as far as the aorist is concerned. The description of the Georgian tenses—both the analytic ones and the synthetic ones—in terms of binary oppositions seems more adequate than a description in terms of the standard ternary make up of the Reichenbachian framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hewitt, B.G. (ed.): Georgian; a Structural Reference Grammar. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Philadelphia (1995)
Hillery, P.J. (ed.): The Georgian Language. An Outline Grammatical Summary. Internet Publication (1996), Internet Publisher Armazi.com www.armazi.com/georgian
Kamp, H., Reyle, U.: From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 42. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)
Rathert, M.: Textures of Time. The Interplay of the Perfect, Durative Adverbs, and Extended-Now-Adverbs in German and English. PhD thesis, Tuebingen, Tuebingen (2003)
Reichenbach, H.: Elements of Symbolic Logic. The Macmillan Company, New York (first free press paperback edition 1966 edn.) (1947)
Sakhltkhutsishvili, K.: Semantics of Georgian tense and aspect systems. PhD thesis, UILOTS Utrecht University, Utrecht (in preparation, 2007)
Shanidze, A. (ed.): Basics of the Grammar of the Georgian Language. Tbilisi University Press, Tbilisi (written in Georgian) (1980)
Te Winkel, L.A.: Over de wijzen en tijden der werkwoorden. De Taalgids 8, 66–75 (1866)
Verkuyl, H.J., Le Loux-Schuringa, J.A.: Once upon a tense. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 237–261 (1985)
Verkuyl, H., Vet, C., Borillo, A., Bras, M., Le Draoulec, A., Molendijk, A., de Swart, H., Vetters, C., Vieu, L.: Tense and aspect in sentences. In: Corblin, F., de Swart, H. (eds.) Handbook of French Semantics, pp. 233–270. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA (2004)
Verkuyl, H.J.: Events or indices. In: Gerbrandy, J., Marx, M., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y. (eds.) JFAK. Essays dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday, p. 25. Vossiuspers AUP, Amsterdam (1999), Internet publication: via http://www.let.uu.nl/~Henk.Verkuyl/personal/tense/eoi.pdf
Verkuyl, H.J.: On the compositionality of tense: merging Reichenbach and Prior, http://www.let.uu.nl/~Henk.Verkuyl/personal/tense/prtw.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Verkuyl, H. (2007). Georgian as the Testing-Ground for Theories of Tense and Aspect. In: ten Cate, B.D., Zeevat, H.W. (eds) Logic, Language, and Computation. TbiLLC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4363. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75144-1_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75144-1_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75143-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75144-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)