Trustworthy Digital Long-Term Repositories: The Nestor Approach in the Context of International Developments

  • Susanne Dobratz
  • Astrid Schoger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4675)

Abstract

This paper describes the general approach nestor – the German “Network of Expertise in Long-Term Storage of Digital Resources” has taken in designing a catalogue of criteria for trustworthy digital repositories for long-term preservation and how this approach relates to internationalisation and standardisation of criteria and developments of evaluation methods to facilitate the audit and certification process.

Keywords

Digital Repositories Long-Term Preservation Certification Trustworthiness Auditing Standardisation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik: Common Criteria V 2.3 (2005), URL http://www.bsi.bund.de/cc/index.htm
  2. 2.
    CCSDS (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems): Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Blue Book ISO 14721:2003 Issue 1 (2002), URL http://www.ccsds.org/docu/dscgi/ds.py/Get/File-143/650x0b1.pdf
  3. 3.
    Digital Curation Centre und DigitalPreservationEurope: DCC and DPE Digital Repository Audit Method Based on Risk Assessment, V1.0 (2007) (retrieved 28.02.2007), URL: from http://repositoryaudit.eu/download
  4. 4.
    Erpanet Project: Risk Communication Tool (2003), URL http://www.erpanet.org/guidance/docs/ERPANETRiskTool.pdf
  5. 5.
    McGovern, N.Y., Kenney, A.R., Entlich, R., Kehoe, W.R., Buckley, E.: Virtual Remote Control: Building a Preservation Risk Management Toolbox for Web Resources, D-Lib Magazine 10 [4] (2004), URL http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april04/mcgovern/04mcgovern.html
  6. 6.
    nestor Working Group on Trusted Repositories Certification: Criteria for Trusted Digital Long-Term Preservation Repositories – Version 1 (Request for Public Comment) English Version, Frankfurt am Main (2006), http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0008-2006060703
  7. 7.
    OCLC und Center for Research Libraries: Trustworthy Repositories Audit and Certification: Criteria and Checklist (2007), URL http://www.crl.edu/PDF/trac.pdf
  8. 8.
    OCLC/RLG-NARA Task Force on Digital Repository Certification; CLR; DCC; DPE und nestor: Core Requirements for digital Archives (Common Principles) (2007), URL http://www.crl.edu/content.asp?l1=13&l2=58&l3=162&l4=92
  9. 9.
    RLG NARA Task Force on Digital Repository Certification: Audit Checklist for Certifying Digital Repositories, RLG, NARA Task Force on Digital Repository Certification, Mountain View, CA (2005), URL http://www.rlg.org/en/pfds/rlgnara-repositorychecklist.pdf
  10. 10.
    RLG Working Group on Digital Archive Attributes,: Trusted Digital Repositories: Attributes and Responsibilities, RLG; OCLC, Mountain View CA (2002), URL http://www.rlg.org/longterm/repositories.pdf
  11. 11.
    Task Force on Archiving Digital Information: Preserving Digital Information, Commission on Preservation and Access, Washington, DC (1996), URL ftp://ftp.rlg.org/pub/archtf/final-report.pdf
  12. 12.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne Dobratz
    • 1
  • Astrid Schoger
    • 2
  1. 1.Humboldt-University Berlin, University Library, 10099 BerlinGermany
  2. 2.Bavarian State Library, 80328 MünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations