Advertisement

Constituent Assimilation

  • William LahozEmail author
  • Quentin Errera
Chapter

Abstract

Background. In the 1990s, following years of development of meteorological data assimilation by the Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) community, the data assimilation methodology began to be applied to constituents, with a strong focus on stratospheric ozone (Rood 2005; Lahoz et al. 2007a). Because of its comparatively later application, constituent data assimilation is less mature than meteorological data (henceforth NWP) assimilation. Nevertheless, there has been substantial progress over the last 15 years, with the field evolving from initial efforts to test the methodology to later efforts focusing on products for monitoring ozone and other constituents. More recently, the production of ozone forecasts by a number of operational centres has become routine. A notable feature of the application of the data assimilation methodology to constituents has been the strong interaction between the NWP and research communities, for example, in the EU-funded ASSET project (Lahoz et al. 2007b). A list of acronyms can be found in Appendix.

Keywords

Data Assimilation Numerical Weather Prediction Numerical Weather Prediction Model Total Column Ozone Ozone Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to R. Dragani, I. Štajner, C. Long, S. Eckermann, H. Eskes, S. Polavarapu and D. Jackson for providing updated information on constituent assimilation efforts at ECMWF, GMAO, NCEP, NRL, KNMI, Canada and the Met Office (UK), respectively.

References

  1. Austin, J., 1992. Towards the four-dimensional variational assimilation of stratospheric chemical constituents. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 2569–2588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, J., B.R. Barwell, S.J. Cox, et al., 1994. The diagnosis and forecast of clear sky ultraviolet levels at the Earth’s surface. Met. Apps., 1, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baier, F., T. Erbertseder, O. Morgenstern, et al., 2005. Assimilation of MIPAS observations using a three-dimensional global chemistry-transport model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 3529–3542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergamaschi, P., M. Krol, F. Dentener, et al., 2005. Inverse modelling of national and European CH4 emissions using the atmospheric zoom model TM5. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2431–2460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake, D. and R.S. Lindzen, 1973. Effect of photochemical models on calculated equilibria and cooling rates in the stratosphere. Mon. Weather Rev., 101, 783–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blond, N. and R. Vautard, 2004. Three-dimensional ozone analyses and their use for short term ozone forecasts. J. Geophys. Res., 109, 10.1029/2004JD004515.Google Scholar
  7. Bormann, N. and S. Healy, 2006. A fast radiative transfer model for the assimilation of infrared limb radiances from MIPAS: Accounting for horizontal gradients. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 2357–2376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bormann, N., S. Healy and M. Hamrud, 2007. Assimilation of MIPAS limb radiances in the ECMWF system. Part II: Experiments with a 2-dimensional observation operator. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 133, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bormann, N., M. Matricardi and S.B. Healy, 2005. RTMIPAS: A fast radiative transfer model for the assimilation of infrared limb radiances from MIPAS. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 1631–1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bormann, N. and J.-N. Thépaut, 2007. Assimilation of MIPAS limb radiances in the ECMWF system. Part I: Experiments with a 1-dimensional observation operator. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 133, 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouttier, F. and P. Courtier, 1999. Data assimilation concepts and methods. ECMWF training notes, March 1999. Available from http://www.ecmwf.int.
  12. Burrows, W.R., M. Vallée, D.I. Wardle, et al., 1994. The Canadian operational procedure for forecasting total ozone and UV radiation. Met. Apps., 1, 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caplan, P., J. Derber, W. Gemmill, et al., 1997. Changes to the 1995 NCEP operational medium-range forecast model analysis – forecast system. Weather Forecasting, 12, 581–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cariolle, D. and M. Déqué, 1986. Southern hemisphere medium-scale waves and total ozone disturbances in a spectral general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res., 91, 10825–10884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cariolle, D. and J.-J. Morcrette, 2006. A linearized approach to the radiative budget of the stratosphere: influence of the ozone distribution. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L05806, doi:10.1029/2005GL025597.Google Scholar
  16. Cariolle, D. and H. Teyssèdre, 2007. A revised linear ozone photochemistry parameterization for use in transport and general circulation models: Multi-annual simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2183–2196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chapnik, B., G. Desroziers, F. Rabier and O. Talagrand, 2006. Diagnosis and tuning of observational error statistics in a quasioperational data assimilation setting. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 543–565.Google Scholar
  18. Chipperfield, M.P., B.V. Khattatov and D.J. Lary, 2002. Sequential estimation of stratospheric chemical observations in a three-dimensional model. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 10.1029/2002JD002110.Google Scholar
  19. Connew, P., 1999. Chemical data assimilation using the UKMO Unified Model. Proceedings of the SODA Workshop on Chemical Data Assimilation, 9–10 December 1998, KNMI, De Bilt, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  20. Courtier, P., 1997. Dual formulation of four-dimensional variational assimilation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 2449–2461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coy, L., D.R. Allen, S.D. Eckermann, et al., 2007. Effects of model chemistry and data biases on stratospheric ozone assimilation. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2917–2935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Daley, R., 1995. Estimating the wind field from chemical constituent observations: Experiments with a one-dimensional extended Kalman filter. Mon. Weather Rev., 123, 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davies, T., M.J.P. Cullen, A.J. Malcolm, et al., 2005 A new dynamical core for the Met Office’s global and regional modelling of the atmosphere. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 1759–1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dee, D. and A. de Silva, 2003. The choice of variable for atmospheric moisture analysis. Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. de Grandpré, J., R. Ménard, Y.J. Rochon, et al., 2009. Radiative impact of ozone on temperature predictability in a coupled chemistry-dynamics data assimilation system. Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 679–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Derber, J., H.-L. Pan, J. Alpert, et al., 1998. Changes to the 1998 NCEP operational MRF Model Analysis/Forecast system. Available from http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/tpb/449/449body.htm.
  27. Desroziers, G., L. Berre, B. Chapnik and P. Poli, 2005. Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis-error statistics in observation space. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 3385–3396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dessler, A.E., 2000. The Chemistry and Physics of Stratospheric Ozone. Academic Press, London, 209pp.Google Scholar
  29. Dethof, A., 2003. Assimilation of ozone retrievals from the MIPAS instrument onboard ENVISAT. ECMWF Tech Memo 428. Google Scholar
  30. Dethof, A., 2004. Monitoring and assimilation of MIPAS, SCIAMACHY and GOMOS retrievals at ECMWF. ESA Contract 17585/03/IOL: Technical support for global validation of ENVISAT data products.Google Scholar
  31. Dethof, A. and E. Hólm, 2004. Ozone assimilation in the ERA-40 reanalysis project. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 130, 2851–2872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Douglass, A.R., M.R. Schoeberl, R.B. Rood and S. Pawson, 2003. Evaluation of transport in the lower tropical stratosphere in a global chemistry and transport model. J. Geophys. Res., 108, Art. No. 4259.Google Scholar
  33. Dragani, R. and D. Dee, 2008. Progress in ozone monitoring and assimilation. ECMWF Newsletter, 116, 35–42, Summer 2008. Available from http://www.ecmwf.int.Google Scholar
  34. Eckermann, S.D., K.W. Hoppel, L. Coy, et al., 2008. High-altitude data assimilation experiments for the Northern Summer Mesosphere season of 2007. J. Atmos. Sol Terr. Phys., 71, 531–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ECMWF, 2007. ECMWF Newsletter No. 100 – Winter 2006/07. Available from http://www.ecmwf.int.
  36. El Amraoui, L., P. Ricaud, J. Urban, et al., 2004. Assimilation of ODIN/SMR O3 and N2O measurements in a three-dimensional chemistry transport model. J. Geophys. Res., 109, 10.1029/2004JD004796.Google Scholar
  37. Elbern, H. and H. Schmidt, 1999. A four-dimensional variational chemistry data assimilation scheme for Eulerian chemistry transport modeling. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 18583–18598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Elbern, H. and H. Schmidt, 2001. Ozone episode analysis by four-dimensional variational chemistry data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3569–3590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Elbern, H., H. Schmidt and A. Ebel, 1997. Variational data assimilation for tropospheric chemistry modeling. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 15967–15985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Elbern, H., A. Strunk, H. Schmidt and O. Talagrand, 2007. Emission rate and chemical state estimation by 4-dimensional variational inversion. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3749–3769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. El Serafy, G.Y. and H.M. Kelder, 2003. Near-real-time approach to assimilation of satellite-retrieved 3D ozone fields in a global model using a simplified Kalman filter. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 3099–3120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. El Serafy, G.Y., R.J. van der A, H. Eskes and H.M. Kelder, 2002. Assimilation of 3D ozone field in global chemistry transport models using the full Kalman filter. Adv. Space Res., 30, 2473–2478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Engelen, R.J., S. Serrar and F. Chevallier, 2009. Four-dimensional data asimilation of atmospheric CO2 using AIRS observations. J. Geophys. Res., 114, D03304, doi: 10.1029/2008JD010739.Google Scholar
  44. Errera, Q., S. Bonjean, S. Chabrillat, et al., 2007. BASCOE assimilation of ozone and nitrogen dioxide observed by MIPAS and GOMOS: Comparison between the two sets of analyses. ESA Special Publication SP-636.Google Scholar
  45. Errera, Q., F. Daerden, S. Chabrillat, et al., 2008. 4D-Var assimilation of MIPAS chemical observations: Ozone and nitrogen dioxide analyses. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6169-6187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Errera, Q. and D. Fonteyn, 2001. Four-dimensional variational chemical data assimilation of CRISTA stratospheric measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 12253–12265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Eskes, H.J., 2006. The integration of atmospheric chemistry observations by next generation global/hemispheric and regional and NWP models. In Chemical Data Assimilation for the Observation of the Earth’s Atmosphere. ACCENT/WMO Expert Workshop in support of IGACO, Barrie, L.A., J.P. Burrows, P. Monks and P. Borrell (eds.), WMO Tech, Report 1360, GAW Report 169, pp 44–49.Google Scholar
  48. Eskes, H.J., A. Segers and P.F.J. van Velthoven, 2005. Ozone forecasts of the Stratospheric Polar Vortex-Splitting Event in September 2002. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 812–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Eskes, H.J., P.F.J. van Velthoven and H.M. Kelder, 2002. Global ozone forecasting based on ERS-2 GOME observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Eskes, H.J., P.F.J. van Velthoven, P.F.M. Valks and H.M. Kelder, 2003. Assimilation of GOME total-ozone satellite observations in a three-dimensional tracer-transport model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 1663–1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Eyring, V., N. Butchart, D.W. Waugh, et al., 2006. Assessment of temperature, trace species, and ozone in chemistry-climate model simulations of the recent past. J. Geophys. Res., 111, 10.1029/2006JD007327.Google Scholar
  52. Fierli, F., A. Hauchecorne, S. Bekki, et al., 2002. Data assimilation of stratospheric ozone using a high-resolution transport model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 10.1029/2001GL014272.Google Scholar
  53. Fisher, M. and D.J. Lary, 1995. Lagrangian 4-dimensional variational data assimilation of chemical species. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 121, 1681–1704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Fonteyn, D., Q. Errera, M. DeMazière, et al., 2000. 4D-Var assimilation of stratospheric aerosol satellite data. Adv. Space Res., 26, 2049–2052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Fortuin, J.P.F. and H. Kelder, 1998. An ozone climatology based on ozonesonde and satellite measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31709–31734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Geer, A.J., W.A. Lahoz, S. Bekki, et al., 2006a. The ASSET intercomparison of ozone analyses: Method and first results. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5445–5474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Geer, A.J., W.A. Lahoz, D.R. Jackson, et al., 2007. Evaluation of linear ozone photochemistry parametrizations in a stratosphere-troposphere data assimilation system. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 939–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Geer, A.J., C. Peubey, R. Bannister, et al., 2006b. Assimilation of stratospheric ozone from MIPAS into a global general circulation model: The September 2002 vortex split. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hadjinicolau, P., J.A. Pyle, M.P. Chipperfield and J.A. Kettleborough, 1997. Effect of interannual meteorological variability on mid latitude O3. Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2993–2996.Google Scholar
  60. Hollingsworth, A., 2005. Global Earth-system modelling using space and in situ data. ECMWF Seminar Proceedings, September 2005, Reading, UK. Available from http://www.ecmwf.int.
  61. Hollingsworth, A., R.J. Engelen, C. Textor, et al., 2008. Toward a monitoring and forecasting system for atmospheric composition: The GEMS project. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 89, doi: 10.1175/2008BAMS2355.1.Google Scholar
  62. Hólm, E., E. Andersson, A. Beljaars, et al., 2002. Assimilation and modelling of the hydrological cycle: ECMWF’s status and plans. ECMWF Tech Memo 383.Google Scholar
  63. Houtekamer, P.L., L.M. Herschel, G. Pellerin, et al., 2005. Atmospheric data assimilation with an ensemble Kalman filter: Results with real observations. Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 604–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. IGACO, 2004. The changing atmosphere. An integrated global atmospheric chemistry observation theme for the IGOS partnership. ESA SP-1282, Report GAW No. 159 (WMO TD No. 1235), September 2004; Implementation up-date, December 2004. Available from http://www.igospartners.org/docsTHEM.htm.
  65. Jackson, D.R., 2004. Improvements in data assimilation at the Met Office. Forecasting Research Technical Report No. 454, Met Office.Google Scholar
  66. Jackson, D.R., 2007. Assimilation of EOS MLS ozone observations in the met office data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 133, 1771–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jackson, D.R. and Y.J. Orsolini, 2008. Estimation of Arctic ozone loss in winter 2004/05 based on assimilation of EOS MLS and SBUV/2 observations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 134, 1833–1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jackson, D.R. and R. Saunders, 2002. Ozone data assimilation: Preliminary system. Forecasting Research Technical Report No. 394, Met Office.Google Scholar
  69. Juckes, M.N., 2006. Evaluation of MIPAS ozone fields assimilated using a new algorithm constrained by isentropic tracer advection. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1549–1565.Google Scholar
  70. Khattatov, B.V., 2003. Multivariate chemical data assimilation. In Data Assimilation for the Earth System. NATO Science Series: IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences 26, Swinbank, R., V. Shutyaev and W.A. Lahoz, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 279–288, 378pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Khattatov, B.V., J.C. Gille, L.V. Lyjak, et al., 1999. Assimilation of photochemically active species and a case analysis of UARS data. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 18715–18737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Khattatov, B.V., J.-F. Lamarque, L.V. Lyjak, et al., 2000. Assimilation of satellite observations of long-lived chemical species in global chemistry transport models. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 29135–29144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Khattatov, B., L. Lyjak and J. Gille, 2001. On applications of photochemical models to the design of measurement strategies. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2377–2380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lahoz, W.A., 2006. Chemical data assimilation: Choices and challenges. In Chemical Data Assimilation for the Observation of the Earth’s Atmosphere. ACCENT/WMO Expert Workshop in support of IGACO, Barrie, L.A., J.P. Burrows, P. Monks and P. Borrell (eds.), WMO Tech, Report 1360, GAW Report 169, pp 106–110.Google Scholar
  75. Lahoz, W.A., R. Brugge, D.R. Jackson, et al., 2005. An observing system simulation experiment to evaluate the scientific merit of wind and ozone measurements from the future SWIFT instrument. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lahoz, W.A., Q. Errera, R. Swinbank and D. Fonteyn, 2007a. Data assimilation of stratospheric constituents: A review. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5745–5773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Lahoz, W.A., A.J. Geer, S. Bekki, et al., 2007b. The Assimilation of Envisat data (ASSET) project. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1773–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lamarque, J.-F. and J.C. Gille, 2003. Improving the modeling of error variance evolution in the assimilation of chemical species: Applications to MOPITT data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 10.1029/2003GL016994.Google Scholar
  79. Lamarque, J.-F., B.V. Khattatov and J.C. Gille, 2002. Constraining tropospheric ozone column through data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 10.1029/2001JD001249.Google Scholar
  80. Lary, D.J., 1999. Data assimilation: A powerful tool for atmospheric chemistry. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A357, 3445–3457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lary, D.J., B. Khattatov and H.Y. Mussa, 2003. Chemical data assimilation: A case study of solar occultation data from the ATLAS 1 mission of the Atmospheric Trace Molecule Spectroscopy Experiment (ATMOS). J. Geophys. Res., 108, 10.101029/2003JD003500.Google Scholar
  82. Lemus-Deschamps, L., S. Grainger, L. Rikus, et al., 2005. Australian UV and ozone forecasting system. Available from http://www.bom.gov.au/bmrc/mdev/expt/uvindex/uvi.shtml.
  83. Levelt, P.F., B.V. Khattatov, J.C. Gille, et al., 1998. Assimilation of MLS ozone measurements in the global three-dimensional chemistry transport model ROSE. Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 4493–4496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lindzen, R.S. and R. Goody, 1965. Radiative and photochemical processes in mesospheric dynamics: Part I, models for radiative and photochemical processes. J. Atmos. Sci., 22, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Logan, J.A., 1999. An analysis of ozonesonde data for the troposphere: Recommendations for testing 3-D models, and development of a gridded climatology for tropospheric ozone. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16115–16149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Long, C.S., 2003. UV Index forecasting practices around the world. SPARC Newsletter no. 21, June 2003.Google Scholar
  87. Long, C.S., S. Zhu and R. Treadon, 2007. Assimilation of multiple ozone products into the NCEP operational forecast model. Presentation at the SPARC Data Assimilation Workshop, Toronto, September 2007, abstract available from http://atlas-conferences.com/c/a/u/e/10.htm.
  88. Lorenc, A.C., 2003. The potential of the ensemble Kalman filter for NWP: A comparison with 4D-Var. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 129, 3183–3204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lorenc, A.C. and O. Hammon, 1988. Objective quality control of observations using Bayesian methods: Theory and practical implementation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 114, 515–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Louvel, S., 2001. Implementation of a dual variational algorithm for assimilation of synthetic altimeter data in the oceanic primitive equation model MICOM. J. Geophys. Res., 106, 9199–9212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Lyster, P.M., S.E. Cohn, R. Ménard, et al., 1997. Parallel implementation of a Kalman filter for constituent data assimilation. Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 1674–1686.Google Scholar
  92. Marchand, M., S. Bekki, L. Denis and J.-P. Pommereau, 2003. Test of the nightime polar stratospheric NO2 decay using wintertime SAOZ measurements and chemical data assimilation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 10.1029/2003GL017582.Google Scholar
  93. Marchand, M., S. Bekki, A. Hauchecorne and J.-L. Bertaux, 2004. Validation of the self-consistency of GOMOS NO3, NO2 and O3 data using chemical data assimilation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, 10.1029/2004GL019631.Google Scholar
  94. Marchand, M., S. Bekki, F. Lefèvre and A. Hauchecorne, 2007. Temperature retrieval from stratospheric O3 and NO3 GOMOS data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L24809, doi: 10.1029/2007GL030280.Google Scholar
  95. Massart, S., D. Cariolle and V.-H. Peuch, 2004. Towards an improvement of the atmospheric ozone distribution and variability by the assimilation of satellite data. C.R. Geosci., 15, 1305–1310.Google Scholar
  96. Massart, S., C. Clerbaux, D. Cariolle, et al., 2009. First steps towards the assimilation of IASI ozone data into the MOCAGE-PALM system. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5073–5091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Mathison, C., D.R. Jackson and M. Keil, 2007. Methods of improving the representation of ozone in the Met Office model. NWP Tech. Report No. 502, Met Office.Google Scholar
  98. McCormack J.P., S.D. Eckermann, L. Coy, et al., 2004. NOGAPS-ALPHA model simulations of stratospheric ozone during the SOLVE2 campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2401–2423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. McCormack, J.P., S.D. Eckermann, D.E. Siskind and T.J. McGee, 2006. CHEM2D-OPP: A new linearized gas-phase ozone photochemistry parameterization for high-altitude NWP and climate models. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4943–497.Google Scholar
  100. McLaughlin, D., A. O’Neill, J. Derber and M. Kamachi, 2005. Opportunities for enhanced collaboration within the data assimilation community. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 3683–3693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. McLinden C.A., S.C. Olsen B. Hannegan, et al., 2000. Stratospheric ozone in 3-D models: A simple chemistry and the cross-tropopause flux. J. Geophys. Res., 105, 14653–14665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. McNally, A.P., P. Watts, J. Smith, et al., 2006. The assimilation of AIRS radiance data at ECMWF. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 935–958.Google Scholar
  103. Meirink, J.F., H.J. Eskes and A.P.H. Goede, 2006. Sensitivity analysis of methane emissions derived from SCIAMACHY observations through inverse modelling. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 9405–9445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Ménard, R., S. Chabrillat, C. Charette, et al., 2007. Coupled chemistry-dynamics data assimilation. Presentation at the SPARC Data Assimilation Workshop, Toronto, September 2007, abstract available from http://atlas-conferences.com/c/a/u/e/25.htm.
  105. Ménard, R. and L.-P. Chang, 2000. Stratospheric assimilation of chemical tracer observations using a Kalman filter, Part II: Chi-squared validated results and analysis of variance and correlation dynamics. Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 2672–2686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Ménard, R., S.E. Cohn, L.P. Chang and P.M. Lyster, 2000. Stratospheric assimilation of chemical tracer observations using a Kalman filter, Part I: Formulation. Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 2654–2671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Migliorini, S., C. Piccolo and C.D. Rodgers, 2004. Intercomparison of direct and indirect measurements: MIPAS versus sonde ozone profiles. J. Geophys. Res., 109, 10.1029/2004JD004988.Google Scholar
  108. Monge-Sanz, B.M., M.P. Chipperfield, A.J. Simmons and S.M. Uppala, 2007. Mean age of air and transport in a CTM: Comparison of different ECMWF analyses. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 10.1029/2006GL028515.Google Scholar
  109. Monks, P.S., 2003. Tropospheric photochemistry. In Handbook of Atmospheric Sciences, Hewitt, C.N. and A.V. Jackson (eds.), Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 156–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Morcrette, J.-J., 2003. Ozone radiation interactions in the ECMWF forecast system. ECMWF Tech Memo 375.Google Scholar
  111. Müller, M.D., P.K. Bhartia and I. Štajner, 2004. Assimilation of SBUV version 8 radiances into the GEOS DAS. Proceedings of the Quadrennial Ozone Symposium, GOS, Kos, Greece, June 2004. Available from http://ftp://gmaoftp.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/papers/ivanka/ozone_papers/QOS04.Mueller.pdf.
  112. Müller, J.-F. and T. Stavrakou, 2005. Inversion of CO and NOx emissions using the adjoint of the IMAGES model. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 1157–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Oikonomou, E. and A. O’Neill, 2006. An evaluation of water vapour and ozone in the ERA-40 reanalysis compared with UARS data. J. Geophys. Res., 111, 10.1029/2004JD005341.Google Scholar
  114. Orsolini, Y.J. and G. Nikulin, 2006. A low-ozone episode during the European heat wave of August 2003. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 667–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Pétron, G., C. Granier, B. Khattatov, et al., 2004. Monthly CO surface sources inventory based on the 2000–2001 MOPITT satellite data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, 10.1029/2004GL020560.Google Scholar
  116. Peuch, A., J.-N. Thépaut and J. Pailleux, 2000. Dynamical impact of total-ozone observations in a four-dimensional variational assimilation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 126, 1641–1659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Plumb, R.A. and M.K.W. Ko, 1992. Interrelationships between mixing ratios of long-lived stratospheric constituents. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 10145–10156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Polavarapu, S., S. Ren, Y. Rochon, et al., 2005a. Data assimilation with the Canadian middle atmosphere model. Atmos. Ocean, 43, 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Polavarapu, S., T.G. Shepherd, Y. Rochon and S. Ren, 2005b. Some challenges of middle atmosphere data assimilation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 3513–3527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Rawlins, F., S.P. Ballard, K.J. Bovis, et al., 2007. The met office global four-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 133, 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Rienecker, M.M., M.J. Suarez, R. Todling, et al., 2008. The GEOS-5 data assimilation system – documentation of versions 5.01, 5.1.0 and 5.2.0. NASA Tech. Memo., NASA/TM-2008-104606, Vol. 27, 102 pp. Available from http://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/pubs/docs/GEOSS_104606_Vol27.pdf.
  122. Riishøjgaard, L.-P., 1996. On four-dimensional variational assimilation of ozone data in weather-prediction models. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 122, 1545–1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Riishøjgaard, L.-P., I. Štajner and G.-P. Lou, 2000. The GEOS ozone data assimilation system. Adv. Space Res., 25, 1063–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Rood, R.B., 2003. Ozone assimilation. In Data Assimilation for the Earth System. NATO Science Series: IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences 26, Swinbank, R., V. Shutyaev and W.A. Lahoz, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 263–277, 378pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Rood, R.B., 2005. Assimilation of stratospheric meteorological and constituent observations: A Review. SPARC Newsletter no. 25, July 2005.Google Scholar
  126. Rösevall, J.D., D.P. Murtagh and J. Urban, 2007a. Ozone depletion in the 2006/2007 Arctic winter. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L21809, doi:10.1029/2007GL030620.Google Scholar
  127. Rösevall, J.D., D.P. Murtagh, J. Urban and A.K. Jones, 2007b. A study of polar ozone depletion based on sequential assimilation of satellite data from the ENVISAT/MIPAS and Odin/SMR instruments. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 899–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Russell III, J.M., L.L. Gordley, J.H. Park, et al., 1993. The Halogen occultation experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 98, 10777–10797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Sassi, F., B.A. Boville, D. Kinnison and R.R. Garcia, 2005. The effects of interactive ozone chemistry on simulations of the middle atmosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 10.1029/2004GL022131.Google Scholar
  130. Saunders, R., M. Matricardi and P. Brunel, 1999. An improved fast radiative transfer model for assimilation of satellite radiance observations. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 125, 1407–1426.Google Scholar
  131. Schoeberl, M.R., A.R. Douglass, Z. Zhu and S. Pawson, 2003. A comparison of the lower stratospheric age spectra derived from a general circulation model and two data assimilation systems. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 10.1029/2002JD002652.Google Scholar
  132. Segers, A.J., H.J. Eskes, A.R.J. van der, et al., 2005. Assimilation of GOME ozone profiles and a global chemistry-transport model. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 477–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Semane, N., V.-H. Peuch, S. Pradier, et al., 2009. On the extraction of wind information from the assimilation of ozone profiles in Météo-France 4D-Var operational NWP suite. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 4855–4867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Simmons, A.J., M. Hortal, G. Kelly, et al., 2005. ECMWF analyses and forecasts of stratospheric winter polar vortex breakup: September 2002 in the Southern Hemisphere and related events. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 668–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. SPARC, 2000. SPARC: Assessment of upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric water vapour. WCRP-113, WMO/TD No. 1043, SPARC Report No. 2, Kley, D., J.M. Russell and C. Phillips (eds.), 2000.Google Scholar
  136. Štajner, I., L.-P. Riishøjgaard and R.B. Rood, 2001. The GEOS ozone data assimilation system: Specification of error statistics. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 127, 1069–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Štajner, I. and K. Wargan, 2004. Antarctic stratospheric ozone from the assimilation of occultation data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, 10.1029/2004GL020846.Google Scholar
  138. Štajner, I., K. Wargan, L.-P. Chang, et al., 2006. Assimilation of ozone profiles from the improved limb atmospheric spectrometer-II: Study of Antarctic ozone. J. Geophys. Res., 111, 10.1029/2005JD006448.Google Scholar
  139. Štajner, I., K. Wargan, S. Pawson, et al., 2008. Assimilated ozone from EOS-Aura: Evaluation of the tropopause region and tropospheric columns. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16532, doi: 10.1029/2007JD008863.Google Scholar
  140. Štajner, I., N. Winslow, R.B. Rood and S. Pawson, 2004. Monitoring of observation errors in the assimilation of satellite ozone data. J. Geophys. Res., 109, 10.1029/2003JD006309.Google Scholar
  141. Stolarski, R. and A.R. Douglass, 1985. Parameterization of the photochemistry of stratospheric ozone including catalytic processes. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 10709–10718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Streibel, M., M. Rex, P. von der Gathen, et al., 2006. Chemical ozone loss in the Arctic winter 2002/2003 determined with Match. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2783–2792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Struthers, H., R. Brugge, W.A. Lahoz, et al., 2002. Assimilation of ozone profiles and total column measurements into a global general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 10.1029/2001JD000957.Google Scholar
  144. Talagrand, O., 2003. A posteriori validation of assimilation algorithms. In Data Assimilation for the Earth System. NATO Science Series: IV. Earth and Environmental Sciences 26, Swinbank, R., V. Shutyaev and W.A. Lahoz (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 85–95, 378pp.Google Scholar
  145. Tan, W.-W., M.A. Geller, S. Pawson and A. de Silva, 2004. A case study of excessive subtropical transport in the stratosphere of a data assimilation system. J. Geophys. Res., 109, Art. No. D11102.Google Scholar
  146. Tangborn, A., I. Štajner, M. Buchwitz, et al., 2009. Assimilation of SCIAMACHY total column CO observations: Global and regional analysis of data impact. J. Geophys. Res., 114, 10.1029/2008JD010781.Google Scholar
  147. Thornton, H., D.R. Jackson, S. Bekki, et al., 2009. The ASSET intercomparison of stratosphere and lower mesosphere humidity analyses. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 995–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Trenberth, K. (ed.), 1992. Climate System Modeling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 788pp.Google Scholar
  149. Uppala, S.M., P.W. Kållberg, A.J. Simmons, et al., 2005. The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 2961–3012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Vigouroux, C., M. De Mazière, Q. Errera, et al., 2007. Comparison between ground-based FTIR and MIPAS N2O and HNO3 profiles before and after assimilation in BASCOE. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Wang, K.-Y., D.J. Lary, D.E. Shallcross, et al., 2001. A review on the use of the adjoint method in four-dimensional atmospheric-chemistry data assimilation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 127, 2181–2204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Wargan, K., I. Štajner, S. Pawson, et al., 2005. Assimilation of ozone data from the Michelson interferometer for passive atmospheric sounding. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 2713–2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. WMO, 2006. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion, 2006. World Meteorological Organization, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, Report No. 50. Available from http://www.wmo.ch/web/arep/reports/ozone_2006/ozone_asst_report.html.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norsk Institutt for Luftforskning, Norwegian Institute for Air Research, NILUKjellerNorway
  2. 2.Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, BIRA-IASBBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations