Abstract
Direct current (dc) resistivity methods use artificial sources of current to produce an electrical potential field in the ground. In almost all resistivity methods, a current is introduced into the ground through point electrodes (C1, C2) and the potential field is measured using two other electrodes (the potential electrodes P1 and P2), as shown in Fig. 4.3-1. The source current can be direct current or low-frequency (0.1 – 30 Hz) alternating current. The aim of generating and measuring the electrical potential field is to determine the spatial resistivity distribution (or its reciprocal - conductivity) in the ground. As the potential between P1 and P2, the current introduced through C1 and C2, and the electrode configuration are known, the resistivity of the ground can be determined; this is referred to as the “apparent resistivity”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and further readings
Barker, R. D. (1981): The offset system of electrical resistivity sounding and its use with a multicore cable. Geophys. Prosp., 29, 128–143.
Barker, R. D. (1989): Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four-electrode arrays. Geophysics, 54, 1031–1037.
Barker, R. D. (1992): A simple algorithm for electrical imaging of the subsurface. First Break, 10,2, 52–62.
Beard, L.P. & Morgan, F.D. (1991): Assessment of 2D-resistivity structures using IDinversion. Geophysics, 56, 874–883.
Dahlin, T. (1996): 2D-resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering applications. First Break, 14, 275–283.
Dahlin, T., Bernitone, C. & Loke, M. H. (2002): A 3-D resistivity investigation of a contaminated site at Lernacken, Sweden. Geophysicis, 67, 1692–1700.
Dey, A. & Morrison, H. F. (1979a): Resistivity modelling for arbitrarily shaped twodimensional structures. Geophys. Prosp., 27, 106–136.
Dey, A. & Morrison, H. F. (1979b): Resistivity modelling for arbitrarily shaped threedimensional structures. Geophysics, 44, 753–780.
Edwards, L. S. (1977): A modified pseudosection for resistivity and induced polarisation. Geophysics, 42, 1020–1036.
Fox, R. C., Hohmann, G. W., Killpack, T. J. & Rijo, L. (1980): Topographic effects in resistivity and induced-polarization surveys. Geophysics, 45, 75–93.
Friedel, S. (2000): Über die Abbildungseigenschaften der geoelektrischen Impedanztomographie unter Berücksichtigung von endlicher Anzahl und endlicher Genauigkeit der Meßdaten. Dissertation, Universität Leipzig. Berichte aus der Wissenschaft. Shaker, Aachen.
Habberjam, G. M. (1979): Apparent resistivity observations and the use of square array techniques. Geoexploration Monographs, Series 1, 9. Bornträger, Berlin.
Hoogervorst, G. H. T. C. (1975): Fundamental noise affecting signal-to-noise ratio of resistivity surveys. Geophys. Prosp., 23, 380–390.
INTERPEX Ltd. (1993): RESIX-IP user’s manual. Golden Colorado.
Karous, M. & Pernu, T. K. (1985): Combined sounding-profiling resistivity measurements with three-electrode arrays. Geophys. Prosp., 33, 447–459.
Koefoed, O. (1979): Geosounding principles 1: resistivity sounding measurements. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Lile, O. B., Backe, K. R., Elvebakk, H. & Buan, J. E. (1994): Resistivity measurements on the sea bottom to map fracture zones in the bedrock underneath sediments. Geophys. Prosp., 42, 813–824.
Loke, M. H. & Barker, R. D. (1995): Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections. Geophysics, 60, 1682–1690.
Loke, M. H. & Barker, R. D. ( 1996): Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophys. Prosp., 44, 131–152.
Marin, L. E., Steinich, B., Jaglowski, D. & Barcelona, M. J. (1998): Hydrogeologic site characterization using azimuthal resistivity surveys. JEEG, 3, 179–184.
Milsom, J. (1996): Field Geophysics. Geological Society of London handbook. Open University Press and Halsted Press. Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
Morris, M., Ronning, J. S. & Lile, O. B. (1997): Detecting lateral resistivity inhomogeneities with the Schlumberger array. Geophys. Prosp., 45, 435–448.
Nowroozi, A. A., Horrocks, S. B. & Henderson, P. (1999): Saltwater intrusion into the freshwater aquifer in the eastern shore of Virginia: a reconnaissance electrical resistivity survey. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 42, 1–22.
Ogilvy, R., Meldrum, P., Chambers, J. & Williams, G. (2002): The Use of 3D Electrical Resistivity Tomography to characterise Waste Leachate Distribution within a closed Landfill, Thriplow, UK. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 7, 11–18
Olayinka, A. I. & Yaramanci, U. (2000): Assessment of the reliability of 2D-inversion of apparent resistivity data. Geophys. Prosp., 48, 293–316.
Olayinka, A. I. & Yaramanci, U. (2002): Smooth and sharp-boundary inversion of twodimensional pseudosection data in presence of a decrease in resistivity with depth. Europ. J. Environm. Engin. Geophys., 7, 139–165.
Oldenburg, D. W. & Li, J. (1999): Estimating depth of investigation in dc resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics, 64, 403–416.
Ramirez, A., Daily, W., Binley, A., Labrecque, D. & Roelant, D. (1996): Detection of leaks in underground storage tanks using electrical resistance methods. JEEG, 1, 189–203.
Roy, A. & Apparao, A. (1971): Depth of investigation in direct current methods. Geophysics, 36, 943–959.
Sandberg, S. K. (1993): Examples of resolution improvement in geoelectrical soundings applied to groundwater investigations. Geophys. Prosp., 41, 207–227.
Schulz, R. & Tezkan, B. (1988): Interpretation of resistivity measurements over 2D-structures. Geophys. Prosp., 36, 962–975.
Sharma, S. P. & Kaikkonen, P. (1999): Appraisal of equivalence and suppression problems in ID EM and DC measurements using global optimization and joint inversion. Geophys. Prosp., 47, 219–249.
Sheriff, R.E. (1991): Encyclopedic Dictionary of Exploration Geophysics, 3rd edn. SEG, Tulsa, OK.
Shima, H. (1990): Two-dimensional automatic resistivity inversion technique using alpha-centers. Geophysics, 55, 682–694.
Spitzer, K. (1995): A 3D-finite difference algorithm for DC resistivity modelling using conjugate gradient methods. Geophys. J. Int., 123, 903–914.
Spitzer, K. & Kümpel, H.-J. (1997): 3D FD resistivity modeling and sensitivity analyses applied to a highly resistive phonolitic body. Geophysical Prospecting, 45, 963–982.
Spitzer, K. (1998): The three-dimensional DC sensitivity for surface and subsurface sources. Geophys. J. Int., 134, 736–746
Sumner, J.S. (1976): Principles of Induced Polarization for Geophysical Exploration. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P. & Sheriff, R. E. (1990): Applied geophysics, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Vanhala, H., Soininen, H., Kukkonen, I. (1992): Detecting organic chemical contaminants by spectral-induced polarization method in glacial till environment. Geophysics, 57, 1014–1017.
Vickery, A. C. & Hobbs, B. A. (2002): The effect of subsurface pipes on apparentresistivity measurements. Geophys. Prosp., 50, 1–13.
Ward, S. H. (1990): Resistivity and induced polarization methods. In: Ward, S. H. (Ed.): Geotechnical and environmental geophysics, I: Review and Tutorial. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 147–189.
Watson, K. A. & Barker, R. D. (1999): Differentiating anisotropy and lateral effects using azimuthal resistivity offset Wenner soundings. Geophysics, 64, 739–745.
Weller, A. & Bärner, F.D. (1996): Measurements of spectral induced polarization for environmental purposes. Environmental Geology, 27, 329–334.
Weller, A., Frangos, W., Seichter, M. (1999): Three-dimensional inversion of induced polarization data from simulated waste. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 41, 31–47.
Zohdy, A. A. R. (1989): A new method for the automatic interpretation of Schlumberger and Wenner sounding curves. Geophysics, 54, 245–253.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seidel, K., Lange, G. (2007). Direct Current Resistivity Methods. In: Environmental Geology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74671-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74671-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74669-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74671-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)