Advertisement

Human Trajectory Formation: Taxonomy of Movement Based on Phase Flow Topology

  • Raoul Huys
  • Viktor K. Jirsa
  • Breanna E. Studenka
  • Nicole Rheaume
  • Howard N. Zelaznik
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

The notion that a limited number of ‘motor primitives’ underwrites complex (human) movements is pertinent to various theoretical perspectives on motor control. Consequently, motor primitives have been classified according to different (and often empirically driven) criteria. Departing from the perspective that dynamical systems are unambiguously described in phase space, we propose a movement taxonomy based on phase flow topology. We denote qualitative distinct movement classes as normal forms of movement. The existence of two normal forms of movement governing discrete and rhythmic behavior has been debated repeatedly in the literature. We provide evidence testifying to the existence (and utilization by humans) of both normal forms through a computational analysis and an experimental study involving human participants. We furthermore argue that one other dynamic possibility governing movement likely exists.

Keywords

Normal Form Smooth Pursuit Dynamical System Theory Discrete Movement False Start 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balasubramaniam R, Feldman AG (2004) Guiding movements without redundancy problems. In: Jirsa VK, Kelso JAS (eds) Coordination dynamics: Issues and trends. Springer, Berlin, pp. 155–176Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baratto L, Morasso P, Zaccaria R (1986) Complex motor patterns: Walking. In: Morasso P, Tagliasco V (eds) Advances in Psychology, 33, Human Movement Understanding. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland, pp. 61–81Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beek PJ (1989) Juggling dynamics. Free University Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beek PJ, Schmidt RC, Morris AW, Sim MY, Turvey MT (1995) Linear and nonlinear stiffness and friction in biological rhythmic movements. Biol Cybern 73:499–507zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bizzi E, D’Avella A, Saltiel P, Tresch M (2002) Modular organization of spinal motor systems. Neuroscientist 8:437–442Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buchanan JJ, Park J-H, Ryu YU, Shea CH (2003) Discrete and cyclical units of action in a mixed target pair aiming task. Exp Brain Res 150:473–489Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buchanan JJ, Park J-H, Shea CH (2004) Systematic scaling of target width: dynamics, planning and feedback. Neurosci Lett 367:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burke MR, Barnes GR (2006) Quantitative differences in smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements. Exp Brain Res 172:596–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Byblow WD, Carson RG, Goodman D (1994) Expressions of asymmetries and anchoring in bimanual coordination. Hum Mov Sci 13:3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carey MR, Lisberger SG (2004) Signals that modulate gain control for smooth pursuit eye movements in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 91:623–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carpenter RMS (1977) Movements of the eyes. Pion Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daffertshofer A (1998) Effects of noise on the phase dynamics of nonlinear oscillators. Phys Rev E 58:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Engel KC, Soechting JF (2000) Manual tracking in two dimensions. J Neurophysiol 83:34383–43496Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Engel KC, Anderson JH Soechting JF (2000) Similarity in the response of smooth pursuit and manual tracking to a change in the direction of target motion. J Neurophysiol 84:1149–1156Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feldman AG (1980) Superposition of motor program — I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man. Neuroscience 5:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feldman AG (1986) Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (model) for motor control. J Mot Behav 18:17–54Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fink P, Kelso JAS, Jirsa VJ (under review) Excitability is exogenous to discrete movements.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    FitzHugh R (1961) Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane. Biophys J 1:445–466Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flash T, Hochner B (2005) Motor primitives in vertebrates and invertebrates. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:660–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghahramani Z (2000) Building blocks of movement. Nature 407:682–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guckenheimer J, Holmes P (1983) Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ghafouri M, Feldman AG (2001) The timing of control signals underlying fast point-to-point arm movements. Exp Brain Res 137:411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guiard Y (1993) On Fitts’s and Hooke’s laws: Simple harmonic movement in upper-limb cyclical aiming. Acta Psychol 82:139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guiard Y (1997) Fitts’ law in the discrete vs cyclical paradigm. Hum Mov Sci 16:97–131CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haken H (1983) Synergetics: An introduction: nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics, chemistry, and biology, 3rd rev and enl ed. Springer, Berlin; New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Haken H (1996) Principles of brain functioning. A synergetic approach to brain activity, behavior and cognition. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huys R, Studenka BE, Rheaume N, Zelaznik NH, Jirsa VK (submitted) Discrete timing mechanisms produce discrete and continuous movementsGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ivry R (1997) Cerebellar timing systems. Int Rev Neurobiol 41:555–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ivry RB, Spencer RM, Zelaznik HN, Diedrichsen J (2002) The cerebellum and event timing. Ann N Y Acad Sci 978:302–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jirsa VK (2004) Information processing in brain and behaviour displayed in large scale topologies such as EEG and MEG. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 14:679–692zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jirsa VK, Kelso JAS (2004) Coordination Dynamics: Issues and Trends Springer, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jirsa VK, Kelso JAS (2005) The Excitator as a minimal model for the coordination dynamics of discrete and rhythmic movement generation. J Mot Behav 37:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Joiner WM, Shelhamer M (2006) An internal clock generates repetitive predictive saccades. Exp Brain Res 175:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kay BA (1988) The dimensionality of movement trajectories and the degrees of freedom problem: A Tutorial. Hum Mov Sci 7:343–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kay BA, Kelso JAS, Saltzman EL, Schöner G (1987) Space-time behavior of single and bimanual rhythmical movements: data and limit cycle model. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:178–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kay BA, Saltzman EL, Kelso JAS (1991) Steady-state and perturbed rhythmical movements: a dynamical analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 17:183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kelso JAS (1995) Dynamic patterns: the self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kugler PN, Kelso JAS, Turvey MT (1980) Coordinative structures as dissipative structures I Theoretical lines of convergence. In: Stelmach GE, Requin J (eds) Tutorials in motor behaviour. Amsterdam, North HollandGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Leist A, Freund HJ, Cohen B (1987) Comparative characteristics of predictive eye-hand tracking. Hum Neurobiol 6:19–26Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liao MJ, Jagacinski RJ (2000) A dynamical systems approach to manual tracking. J Mot Behav 32:361–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Miall RC, Ivry R (2004) Moving to a different beat. Nat Neurosci 7:1025–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mitra S, Riley MA, Turvey MT (1998) Intermediate motor learning as decreasing active (dynamical) degrees of freedom. Hum Mov Sci 17:17–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Morasso P (1986) Understanding cursive script as a trajectory formation paradigm. In: Kao HSR, van Galen GP, Hoosain R (eds) Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, North-Holland pp. 137–167Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mottet D, Bootsma RJ (1999) The dynamics of goal-directed rhythmic aiming. Biol Cybern 80:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mrotek LA, Flanders M, Soechting JF (2006) Oculomotor responses to gradual changes in target direction. Exp Brain Res 172:175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Murray JD (1993) Mathematical Biology. New York: SpringerzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E (2000) Motor learning through the combination of primitives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 355:1755–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Giszter SF, Bizzi E (1994) Linear combinations of primitives in vertebrate motor control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:7534–7538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Perko L (1991) Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Polit A, Bizzi E (1978) Processes controlling arm movements in monkeys. Science 201:1235–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Polit A, Bizzi E (1979) Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 42:183–194Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Poulton EC (1974) Tracking skill and manual control. Academic Press Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Salman MS (2002) The cerebellum: it’s about time! But timing is not everything — new insights into the role of the cerebellum in timing motor and cognitive tasks. J Child Neurol 17:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schaal S, Sternad D (2001) Origins and violations of the 2/3 power law in rhythmic three-dimensional arm movements. Exp Brain Res 136:60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schaal S, Sternad D, Osu R, Kawato M (2004) Rhythmic arm movement is not discrete. Nat Neurosci 7:1136–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schöner G (1990) A dynamic theory of coordination of discrete movement. Biol Cybern 53:257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Spencer RMC, Zelaznik HN, Diedrichsen J, Ivry RB (2003) Disrupted timing of discontinous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science 300:1437–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sternad D (2008) Rhythmic and discrete movements — behavioral, modeling and imaging results. In: Fuchs A, Jirsa VK (eds), Coordination: Neural, Behavioral and Social Coordination. Springer (this volume)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sternad D, Schaal S (1999) Segmentation of endpoint trajectories does not imply segmented control. Exp Brain Res 124:118–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sternad D, Dean WJ, Schaal S (2000) Interaction of rhythmic and discrete pattern generators in single-joint movements. Hum Mov Sci 19: 627–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sternad D, Wei K, Diedrichsen J, Ivry RB (2006) Intermanual interactions during initiation and production of rhythmic and discrete movements in individuals lacking a corpus callosum. Exp Brain Res 176:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Steward I (1995) Concepts of modern mathematics. Dover Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    St-Onge N, Adamovich SV, Feldman AG (1997) Control movements underlying elbow flexion movements may be independent of kinematic and electromyographic patterns: Experimental study and modeling. Neuroscience 79:295–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Strogatz SH (1994) Nonlinear dynamics and chaos With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. Perseus Books Publishing LLC, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Throughman KA, Shadmehr R (2000) Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407:742–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Teulings H-L, Mullins PA, Stelmach GE (1986) The elementary units of programming in handwriting. In: Kao HSR, van Galen GP, Hoosain R (eds) Graphonomics: Contemporary research in handwriting. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, North-Holland pp. 21–32Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    van Mourik AM, Beek PJ (2004) Discrete and cyclical movements: Unified dynamics or separate control? Acta Psychol 117:121–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Viviani P, Campadelli P, Mounoud P (1987) Visuo-manual tracking of human two-dimensional movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13:62–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Viviani P, Flash T (1995) Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:32–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wei K, Wertman G, Sternad D (2003) Interactions between rhythmic and discrete components in a bimanual task. Motor Control 7:134–154Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Wing AM, Kristofferson AB (1973) Response delays and the timing of discrete responses. Percept Psychophys 13:5–12Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Woch A, Plamondon R (2004) Using the framework of the kinematic theory for the definition of a movement primitive. Motor Control 8:547–557Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zelaznik HN, Spencer RMC, Ivry RB (2002) Dissociation between explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28:575–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Zelaznik HN, Spencer RMC, Ivry RB, Baria A, Bloom M, Dolansky L, Justice S, Patterson K, Whetter E (2005) Timing variability in circle drawing and tapping: Probing the relationship between event and emergent timing. J Mot Behav 37:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raoul Huys
    • 1
  • Viktor K. Jirsa
    • 1
  • Breanna E. Studenka
    • 2
  • Nicole Rheaume
    • 2
  • Howard N. Zelaznik
    • 2
  1. 1.Theoretical Neuroscience Group, UMR 6152 Institut Mouvement et PerceptionUniversité de la Méditerranée and CNRSMarseille, Cedex 09France
  2. 2.Health and KinesiologyPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations