Integration of Learning and Working: Convergent Processes and Systems

  • J. M. Pawlowski
  • M. Bick
Part of the International Handbooks on Information Systems book series (INFOSYS)

Learning is no longer limited to an institutional context such as schools or higher education. In this paper, we will show how learning should be organized in different contexts, such as the workplace or during leisure time. The main corresponding trend leading to changes for organizations and individuals is the trend of convergence. Thereby, this article focuses on two issues: (a) How can learning and business processes be integrated into a common process framework? and (b) How can the related systems be integrated to enable an efficient workflow?


Business Process Knowledge Management Learn Management System Synergy Effect Knowledge Management System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M. (Eds.) (2003). Process Management -A Guide for the Design of Business Processes, Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Bick, M., Pawlowski, J. M. (2006). Interface standards: integration of learning and business information systems. In U. D. Ehlers, J. M. Pawlowski (Eds.), European Handbook of Quality and Standardisation in E-Learning. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Bick, M., Pawlowski, J. M. (2007), A Framework for integrated ambient learning and knowledge environments. In N. Gronau (Ed.), 4th Conference on Profes-sional Knowledge Management - Experiences and Visions, Part 2 (pp. 335–342). Berlin: GITO.Google Scholar
  4. Bider, I. (2003). Choosing approach to business process modeling - practical perspective. Research Report, IbisSoft, 2003,
  5. CEN/ISSS (2006). CEN Workshop Agreement (CWA) 15555 Building Application Profiles for eLearning, Brussels.Google Scholar
  6. Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN e.V.) (2004). Aus- und Weiterbildung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von e-Learning - Teil 2: Didaktisches Objektmodell - Modellierung und Beschreibung didaktischer Szenarien [Learning, Education and Training focussing on e-Learning - Part 2: Didactic Objects Model - Modelling and Description of Scenarios for Learning, Education and Training]. Berlin: Beuth.Google Scholar
  7. Dietze, S., Gugliotta, A., Domingue, J. (2007). A semantic Web service oriented framework for adaptive learning environments. In European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC) 2007, Innsbruck, Austria.Google Scholar
  8. Dodds, P., Thropp, S. E. (2004). SCORM 2004, 2nd edition overview. Accessed 5 July 2005.
  9. Dumont, B., Sangra, A. (2006). Organisational and cultural similarities and dif-ferences in implementing quality in e-learning in Europe’s higher education, In. U. D. Ehlers, J. M. Pawlowski (Eds.), European Handbook of Quality and Standardisation in E-Learning. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Fettke, P., Loos, P. (2003). Classification of reference models - a methodology and its application. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson, D., Aldrich, C., Prensky, M. (Eds.) (2006). Games and Simulations in Online Learning: Research and Development Frameworks. Hershey, PA: Information Science.Google Scholar
  12. Hasselbring, W. (2000). Information system integration: introduction. Communications of the ACM, 43(6), 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (2002). Learning Object Meta-data Standard, IEEE 1484.12.1-2002.Google Scholar
  14. Illeris, K. (2004). A model for learning in working life. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Konstantas, D., Bourrières, J.-P., Léonard, M., Boudjlida, N. (Eds.) (2006). Inter-operability of Enterprise Software and Applications. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Koper, R., Olivier, B., Anderson, T. (2002). IMS Learning Design Information Model, Version 1.0. Accessed 12 June 2003.
  17. Lam, W. (2005). Investigating success factors in enterprise application integra-tion: a case-driven analysis. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linthicum, D. S. (2001). B2B Application Integration: e-Business Enable Your Enterprise. Boston: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  19. Lytras, M. D., Pouloudi, A., Poulymenakou, A. (2002). A framework for tech-nology convergence in learning and working. Educational Technology and Society, 5(2), 99–106.Google Scholar
  20. Mashari M. A., Zairi M. (1999). BPR implementation process: an analysis of key success and failure factors. Business Process Management Journal, 5(1), 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Naeve, A., Sicilia, M. A. (2006): Learning processes and processing learning: from organizational needs to learning designs. In ADALE, International Workshop on Adaptative Learning and Learning Design. Dublin, Ireland, June 2006.Google Scholar
  22. Pawlowski, J. M. (2001). Das Essener-Lern-Modell (ELM): Ein Vorgehensmodell zur Entwicklung computerunterstützter Lernumgebungen [The Essen Learning Model: A model for the development of computer-supported learning environ-ments]. Dissertation, University of Essen.Google Scholar
  23. Pawlowski, J. M., Bick, M. (2006). Managing & re-using didactical expertise: the didactical object model. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 84–96.Google Scholar
  24. Pawlowski, J. M., Richter, T. (2007). Context and Culture Metadata - A Tool for the Internationalization of E-Learning. In C. Montgomerie, J. Seale (Eds.), ED-MEDIA (pp. 4528–4537). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
  25. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  26. Scheer, A.-W. (1992). Architecture of Integrated Information Systems. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Smythe, C., Tansey, F., Robson, R. (2001): IMS Learner Information Package, In-formation Model Specification, Version 1.0. Accessed 12 October 2003.
  28. Torraco, R. J. (1999). Integrating learning with working: a reconception of the role of workplace learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(3), 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. UN/CEFACT & OASIS (2001). Catalog of common business processes, v1.0. Business Process Team, 11 May 2001.Google Scholar
  30. Wersig, G. (1999). Konvergenz als virtuelle Integration und Medienidentitäten [Convergence as a virtual integration and media identities]. Accessed 10 December 2003.
  31. Wilbers, K. (2002). E-Learning didaktisch gestalten D idactical Design of E-Learning]. In A. Hohenstein K. Wilbers (Hrsg.), Handbuch E-Learning (Kap. 4.0) [Handbook E-Learning]. Köln: Deutscher Wirtschaftsdienst.Google Scholar
  32. Wolpers, M., Najjar, J., Verbert, K., Duval, E. (2007): Tracking Actual Usage: the Attention Metadata Approach. Educational Technology and Society, 10(3), 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Pawlowski
    • 1
  • M. Bick
    • 2
  1. 1.Information Technology Research InstituteUniversity of Jyväskylä
  2. 2.Business Information SystemsESCP-EAP European School of ManagementBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations