Abstract
The primary goal of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) is to completely remove the cancer and cure the patient of their carcinoma. Secondary goals of definitive therapy for prostate cancer include both the preservation of preoperative continence and potency. The apical dissection is one of the most crucial steps in the RALP. The dissection of the apex is the one part of this procedure in which the oncological outcome as well as the functional outcomes are in jeopardy if done inaccurately or incorrectly. The surgeon must clearly identify the apex of the prostate to avoid inadvertently entering the prostate and creating a positive surgical margin. The nerves are located in close proximity to the urethra and may be injured if not identified. Post-operative continence is also dependent on an accurate apical dissection. The rhabdosphincter should be clearly identified and a maximum functional urethral length should be maintained to prevent damage to these structures and to avoid postoperative incontinence. If the surgeon does not perform a meticulous dissection the “trifecta” of longterm cancer control, along with recovery of continence and sexual function will not be achieved [1].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bianco FJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA (2005) Radical prostatectomy: long term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology 66 (5 Suppl):83−94
Myers RP, Cahill DR, Kay PA et al. (2000) Puboperineales: muscular boundaries of the male urogenital hiatus in 3D from magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 164:1412−1415
Walsh PC (2002) Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ (eds) Campbell’s urology, vol 4, 8th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 3107−3129
Gillitzer R, Thuroff JW (2003) Technical advances in radical retropubic prostatectomy techniques for avoiding complications. BJU Int 92:172−177
Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Bhandari A (2004) The technique of apical dissection of the prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 93:715−719
Laven BA, Alsikafi NF, Yang XJ, Brendler CB (2004) Minor modifications in apical dissection of radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with clinical stage T2 prostate cancer reduce positive surgical margin incidence. Urology 63:95
Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fisher M, Sarle R, Vallancien G, Delmas V, Hassan M, Bansal A, Hemal AK, Guillonneau B, Menon M (2003) An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 43:444−454
Horninger W, Strasser H, Bartsch G (2005) Radical retropubic prostatectomy: apical preparation and curtain dissection of the neurovascular bundle. BJU Int 95:911−923
Lee SE, Byun SS, Lee HJ, Song SH, Chang IH, Kim YJ, Gill MC, Hong SK (2006) Impact of variations in prostatic apex shape on early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 68:137−141
Eichelberg C, Erbersdobler A, Michl U, Schlomm T, Salomon G, Graefen M, Huland H (2007) nerve distribution along the prostatic capsule. Eur Urol 51:105−110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cathelineau, X., Jaffe, J., Barret, E., Rozet, F., Vallancien, G. (2008). Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: the Apical Dissection. In: John, H., Wiklund, P. (eds) Robotic Urology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74139-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74140-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)