Skip to main content

Robotic Kidney Surgery

  • Chapter
  • 991 Accesses

Abstract

Robotic kidney surgery offers a wide field of possibilities for different types of renal surgical procedures. Especially complex and reconstructive procedures, such as nephron-sparing renal surgery, may benefit from this new technology. In this chapter OR setting, patient positioning, trocar placement, and simple and radical nephrectomy are described, as well as nephroureterectomy, nephron-sparing surgery, special considerations, and complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allaf ME, Bhayani SB et al. (2005) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: duplication of open technique. Urology 65:575–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Badani KK, Hemal AK et al. (2006) Robotic extended pyelolithotomy for treatment of renal calculi: a feasibility study. World J Urol 24:198–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baldwin D, Dunbr J et al. (2003) Single-center comparison of purely laparoscopic, hand-assited laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 17:161–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ball AJ, Leveille RJ et al. (2004) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty and flexible nephroscopy: simultan­eous treatment of ureteropelvicjunction obstruction and nephrolithiasis. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 8:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bendavid Y, Moloo H et al. (2004) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Surg Endosc 18:751–754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Binder J, Brautigan R et al. (2004) Robotic surgery in urology: fact or fantasy? BJU Int 94:1183–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bishoff JT, Allaf ME et al. (1999) Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 3:889–891

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR (2007) Laparoscopic surgery of the kidney. In: Walsh P et al. (2007) Campbell’s urology. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bruyere M, Albaladejo P et al. (2001) Gas embolism during radical nephrectomy by retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 20:36–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Buell JF, Alverdy J et al. (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 192:132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Buell JF, Hanaway MJ et al. (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2:938–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Busby JE and Matin SF (2007) Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for transitional cell carcinoma: Where are we in 2007? [in process citation]. Curr Opin Urol 17:83–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cadeddu JA, Chan DY et al. (1999) Retroperitoneal access for transperitoneal laparoscopy in patients at high risk for intraabdominal scarring. J Endourol 13:567–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cadeddu JA, Ono Y et al. (1998) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer. Evaluation of efficacy and safety: a multi-center experience. Urology 52:773–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Caruso RP, Phillips CK et al. (2006) Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy:initial experience. J Urol 176:36–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Casthilo LN, Fugita OE et al. (2001) Port site tumor recurrences of renal cell carcinoma after videolaparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 165:519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cestari A, Guazzoni G et al. (2004) Laparoscopic cryoablation of solid renal masses: Intermediate-term follow-up. J Urol 172:1267–1270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan DY, Bishoff JT et al. (2000) Endovascular gastrointestinal stapler device malfunction during laparoscopic nephrectomy: early recognition and management. J Urol 164:319–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan DY, Caddedu JA et al. (2001) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: cancer control in renal carcinoma. J Urol 166:2095–2099

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chatterjee S, Nam R et al. (2004) Permanent flank bulge is a consequence of flank incision for radical nephrectomy in one half of patients. Urol Oncol 22:36–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chueh SC, Hsieh JT et al. (2002) Retroperitoneoscopic nephropexy for symptomatic nephroptosis. Surg Endosc 16:1603–1607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Corwin TS et al. (2001) Radiofrequency coagulation to facilitate laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 165:175–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dasgupta P, Jones A et al. (2005) Robotic urological surgery: a perspective. BJU Int 95:20–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davol P, Sumfest J et al. (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Urology 67:199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Del Pizzo JJ, Jacobs SC et al. (2003) Pleural injury during laparoscopic renal surgery: early recognition and managment. J Urol 169:41–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Desai MM, Strzempkowski B et al. (2005) Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 173:38–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Naughton C (2001) Laparoscopic cyst marsupialization in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. J Urol 165:1888–1192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dunn MD, Portis AJ et al. (2000) Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol 164:1153–1159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fadden P, Nakada S (2001) Hand-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery. Urol Clin 28:167–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J et al. (1999) Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2407 procedures in four German centres. J Urol 162:765–771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fazeli-Matin S, Gill IS et al. (1999) Laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery in obese patients: comparison to open surgery. J Urol 162:665–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fugita OE, Chan DY et al. (2004) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in obese patients: outcomes and technical considerations. Urology 63:247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gettman MT, Blute ML et al. (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with da Vinci robotic system. Urology 64:914–918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gill IS (2005) Renal cryotherapy. Urology 65:415–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gill IS, Delworth MG et al. (2002) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol 167:469–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gill IS, Matin S et al. (2003) Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients. J Urol 170:64–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gill IS, Sung GT et al. (2000) Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy for transitional cell carcinoma: the Cleveland Clinic experience. J Urol 164:1513–1522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Guillonneau B, Jayet C et al. (2001) Robot assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 166:200–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Guillonneau B, Bermudez H et al. (2003) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: single center experience comparing clamping and no clamping techniques of the renal vasculature. J Urol 169:483–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Harmon WJ, Kleer E et al. (1996) Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for calculus removal in a pelciv kidney. J Urol 155:2019–2020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hedican SP, Moon TD et al. (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery in the morbidly and profoundly obese. J Endourol 18:241–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hemal AK, Eun D et al. (2004) Nuances in the optimum placement of ports in pelvic and upper urinary tract surgery using the da Vinci robot. Urol Clin 31:683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hemal AK, Goel A et al. (2003) Minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy. J Urol 169:480–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hemal AK, Manon M (2004) Robotics in urology. Curr Opin Urol 14:89–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hogan S, Vanuno D et al. (2002) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation 73:1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Horgan S, Galvani C et al. (2007) Effect of robotic assistance on the learning curve for laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy [epub ahead of print; record supplied by publisher]. Surg Endosc

    Google Scholar 

  47. Horgan S, Vanuno D et al. (2002) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation 73:1474–1479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Horgan S, Beneditti E et al. (2004) Robotically assisted donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Am J Surg 188:45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jarrett TW, Chan DY et al. (2001) Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Urology 57:448–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kaul S, Laungani R et al. (2007) da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 51:186–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kaul S, Manon M (2005) Robotics in laparoscopic urology [in process citation]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14:62–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kerbl K, Clayman RV et al. (1994) Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Urology 43:607–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim F, Rah K et al. (2003) Laparoscopic radical versus partial nephrectomy: assesment of complications. J Urol 170:408–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Klingler DW, Hemstreet GP et al. (2005) Feasibility of robotic radical nephrectomy – initial results of single-institution pilot study. Urology 65:1086–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kumar R, Hemal AK et al. (2005) Robotic renal and adrenal surgery: present and future. BJU Int 96:144–249

    Google Scholar 

  56. Landman J, Colyer WC et al. (2000) Laparoscopic renal ablation: an in vitro comparison of currently available electrical tissue morcellators. Urology 56:677–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Landman J, Lento P et al. (2000) Feasibility of pathological evaluation of morcellated kidneys after radical nephrectomy. J Urol 164:2086–2089

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lee CT, Katz J et al. (2000) Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm or less in a contemp­or­ary cohort. J Urol 163:730–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Lew JKL, Gin T et al. (1992) Anaesthetic problems during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anaesth Intens Care 20:91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Matin SF, Gill IS (2005) Recurrence and survival following laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy with various forms of bladder cuff control. J Urol 173:395–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Matsui Y, Matsuta Y et al. (2004) Laparoscopic nephropexy: treatment outcome and quality of life. J Urol 11:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  62. McAllister M, Bhayani SB et al. (2004) Vena cava transection during retroperitenoscopic nephrectomy: report of the complication and review of the literature. J Urol 172:183–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Nambirajan T, Jeschke S et al. (2004) Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitenoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 64:919–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Nanigian DK, Smith W et al. (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. J Endourol 20:463–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nazemi T, Galich A et al. (2006) Radical nephrectomy performed by open, laparoscopy with or without hand-assistance or robotic methods by the same surgeon produces comparable perioperative results. Int Braz J Urol 32:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Oefelien M, Bayazit Y (2003) Chronic pain syndrome after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 170:1939–1940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Phillips CK, Taneja SS et al. (2005) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the NYU technique. J Endourol 19:441–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Pruthi R, Chun J et al. (2004) The use of fibrin tissue sealant during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 93:813–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Ramakumar S, Roberts WW et al. (2002) Local hemostasis during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using biodegradable hydrogels: initial porcine results. J Endourol 16:489–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Ramani AP, Desai MM et al. (2005) Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases. J Urol 173:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Rassweiler JJ, Stock C et al. (1996) Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in comparison with conventional nephrectomy. Urologe A 35:215–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Rassweiler JJ, Schulze M et al. (2004) Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: Is it better than open surgery? Eur Urol 46:690–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Renoult E, Hubert J et al. (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:472–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Rose K, Khan S et al. (2006) Robotic assisted retroperitenoscopic nephroureterectomy: first experience and the hybrid port technique. Int J Clin Pract 60:12–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Russo P (2005) Renal cryoablation: study with care – proceed with caution. Urology 65:419–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Shanberg AM, Zagnoev M et al. (2002) Tension pneumothorax caused by the argon beam coagulator during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 168:2162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Shekarriz B, Shah G et al. (2004) Impact of temporary hilar clamping during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy on postoperative renal function: a prospective study. J Urol 172:54–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Shuford M, MacDougall E et al. (2004) Complications of contemporary radical nephrectomy: comparison of open versus laparoscopic approach. Urol Oncol 22:121–126

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Siu W, Seifman BD et al. (2003) Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumomediastinum and bilateral pneumothoraces after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 170:1936–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Steinberg AP, Finelli A et al. (2004) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large (greater than 7 cm, T2) renal tumors. J Urol 172:2172–2176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Stifelmann MD, Caruso RP et al. (2005) Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. JSLS 9:83–86

    Google Scholar 

  82. Strohmeyer DM, Peschel R et al. (2004) Changes in renal blood flow in nephroptosis: assessment by color Doppler imaging, isotope renography and correlation with clinical outcome after laparoscopic nephropexy. Eur Urol 45:790–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Urban DA, Kerbl K et al. (1993) Organ entrapment and renal morcellation: permeability studies. J Urol 150:1792

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Urena R, Mendez F et al. (2004) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of solid renal masses without hilar clamping using a monopolar radiofrequency device. J Urol 171:1054–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. User HM, Nadler RB (2003) Applications of FloSeal in nephron-sparing surgery. Urology 62:234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Wille AH, Roigas J et al. (2004) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: techniques, results and oncological outcome in 125 consecutive cases. Eur Urol 45:483–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Wolf JS (1996) Pathophysiologic effects of prolonged laparoscopic operation. Semin Surg Oncol 12:86–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Yoshihiko T et al. (1998) Use of the harmonic scalpel for nephron sparing surgery in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 159:2063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Hoznek A et al. (2004) Robotic renal surgery. Urol Clin North Am 31:731–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Keeley FX, Tolley DA (1998). A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy: defining risk factors for complications. Br J Urol 82: 615–618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Fazeli-Matin S, Gill IS et al. (1999) Laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery in obese patients: comparison to open surgery. J Urol 162:665–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Witt, J. (2008). Robotic Kidney Surgery. In: John, H., Wiklund, P. (eds) Robotic Urology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74139-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74140-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics