Skip to main content

An Outline of an Architecture-Based Method for Optimizing Dependability Attributes of Software-Intensive Systems

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4615))

Abstract

Dependability requirements such as safety and availability often conflict with one another making the development of dependable systems challenging. It is not always possible to design a system that fulfils all of its dependability requirements and consequently, it is necessary to identify conflicts early in the development process and to optimize the architectural design with regard to dependability and cost. This paper first provides an overview of fifteen different approaches to optimizing system designs at an architectural level. Then an abstract method is proposed that synthesises the main points of the different approaches to yield a generic approach that could be applied across a wide variety of different system attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avizienis, A., Laprie, J.C., Randell, B., Landwehr, C.: Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 1, 11–33 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clements, P.C., Kazman, R., Klein, M.: Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies. Addison Wesley Longman, Reading (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bass, L., Clements, P., Kazman, R.: Software Architecture in Practice, 2nd edn. AddisonWesley, Reading (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grunske, L.: Early quality prediction of component-based systems–a generic framework. Journal of Systems and Software 80, 678–686 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vesely, W.E., Goldberg, F.F., Roberts, N.H., Haasl, D.F.: Fault Tree Handbook. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission): IEC 61165: Application of Markov techniques (1995-2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Balsamo, S., Marco, A.D., Inverardi, P., Simeoni, M.: Model-Based Performance Prediction in Software Development: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30, 295–310 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fyffe, D.E., Hines, W.W., Lee, N.K.: System reliability allocation and a computational algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 17, 64–69 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakagawa, Y., Miyazaki, S.: Surrogate constraints algorithm for reliability optimisation problems with two constraints. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 30, 175–180 (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghare, P.M., Taylor, R.E.: Optimal redundancy for reliability in series system. Operations Research 17, 838–847 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Coit, D.W., Smith, A.E.: Reliability optimization of series-parallel systems using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 35, 535–544 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nicholson, M.: Selecting a Topology for Safety-Critical Real-Time Control Systems. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liang, Y.C., Smith, A.E.: An ant system approach to redundancy allocation. In: Angeline, P.J., Michalewicz, Z., Schoenauer, M., Yao, X., Zalzala, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1478–1484. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Thiele, L., Chakraborty, S., Naedele, M.: Real-time calculus for scheduling hard real-time systems. In: ISCAS. Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 101–104 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. In: Giannakoglou, K., Tsahalis, D., Periaux, J., Papailou, P., Fogarty, T., (eds.) EUROGEN 2001, Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimization and Control with Applications to Industrial Problems, Athens, Greece pp. 95–100 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Palermo, G., Silvano, C., Zaccaria, V.: A flexible framework for fast multi-objective design space exploration of embedded systems. In: Chico, J.J., Macii, E. (eds.) PATMOS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2799, pp. 249–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Givargis, T., Palesi, M.: Multi-objective design space exploration using genetic algorithms. In: CODES 2002. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Hardware/Software Codesign, pp. 67–72. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kulturel-Konak, S., Coit, D.W., Baheranwala, F.: Reliability optimization of series-parallel systems using a genetic algorithm. IIE Transactions 45, 254–260 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kulturel-Konak, S., Smith, A.E., Coit, D.W.: Pruned pareto-optimal sets for the system redundancy allocation problem based on multiple prioritized objectives. Journal of Heuristics (in print)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Künzli, S., Thiele, L., Zitzler, E.: Modular design space exploration framework for embedded systems. IEE Proceedings - Computers and Digital Techniques 152, 183–192 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Papadopoulos, Y., Grante, C.: Evolving car designs using model-based automated safety analysis and optimisation techniques. Journal of Systems and Software 76, 77–89 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersson, J., Wallace, D.: Pareto optimization using the struggle genetic crowding algorithm. Engineering Optimization 34, 623–643 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fredriksson, J., Sandström, K., Åkerholm, M.: Optimizing Resource Usage in Component-Based Real-Time Systems. In: Heineman, G.T., Crnković, I., Schmidt, H.W., Stafford, J.A., Szyperski, C.A., Wallnau, K. (eds.) CBSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3489, pp. 49–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grunske, L.: Identifying ”good” architectural design alternatives with multi-objective optimization strategies. In: Osterweil, L.J., Rombach, H.D., Soffa, M.L. (eds.) ICSE 2006. 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, Shanghai, China, May 20-28, 2006, pp. 849–852. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Bondarev, E., Chaudron, M.R.V., de With, P.H.N.: A process for resolving performance trade-offs in component-based architectures. In: Gorton, I., Heineman, G.T., Crnkovic, I., Schmidt, H.W., Stafford, J.A., Szyperski, C.A., Wallnau, K.C (eds.) CBSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4063, pp. 254–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Pimentel, A.D., Erbas, C., Polstra, S.: A systematic approach to exploring embedded system architectures at multiple abstraction levels. IEEE Trans. Computers 55, 99–112 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Livolsi, D., O’Neill, T., Leaney, J., Denford, M., Dunsire, K.: Guided architecture-based design optimisation of CBSs. In: ECBS 2006, pp. 247–258. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gritzalis, S., Spinellis, D., Georgiadis, P.: Security protocols over open networks and distributed systems: formal methods for their analysis, design, and verification. Computer Communications 22, 697–709 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Goseva-Popstojanova, K., Trivedi, K.S.: Architecture-based approach to reliability assessment of software systems. Perform. Eval 45, 179–204 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Reussner, R.H., Schmidt, H.W., Poernomo, I.: Reliability prediction for component-based software architectures. Journal of Systems and Software – Special Issue of Software Architecture – Engineering Quality Attributes 66, 241–252 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hamlet, R.G., Mason, D.V., Woit, D.M.: Theory of software reliability based on components. In: ICSE 2001. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 12-19 May 2001, pp. 361–370. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Becker, S., Grunske, L., Mirandola, R., Overhage, S.: Performance prediction of component-based systems – a survey from an engineering perspective. In: Reussner, R., Stafford, J.A., Szyperski, C.A. (eds.) Architecting Systems with Trustworthy Components. LNCS, vol. 3938, pp. 169–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Grunske, L., Kaiser, B., Papadopoulos, Y.: Model-driven safety evaluation with state-event-based component failure annotations. In: Heineman, G.T., Crnković, I., Schmidt, H.W., Stafford, J.A., Szyperski, C.A., Wallnau, K. (eds.) CBSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3489, pp. 33–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Papadopoulos, Y., McDermid, J.A., Sasse, R., Heiner, G.: Analysis and synthesis of the behaviour of complex programmable electronic systems in conditions of failure. Int. Journal of Reliability Engineering and System Safety 71, 229–247 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Laprie, J.C. (ed.): Dependability: basic concepts and terminology. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Grunske, L.: Formalizing architectural refactorings as graph transformation systems. In: SNPD 2005. 6th International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, pp. 324–329. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nam, D., Park, C.H.: Multiobjective Simulated Annealing: A Comparative Study to Evolutionary Algorithms. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 2, 87–97 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Horn, J., Nafpliotis, N., Goldberg, D.E.: A Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Piscataway, New Jersey, vol. 1, pp. 82–87. IEEE Service Center, Los Alamitos (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Knowles, J.D., Corne, D.W.: Approximating the Nondominated Front Using the Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy. Evolutionary Computation 8, 149–172 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yim, J.S., Kyung, C.M.: Datapath layout optimisation using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. IEE Proceedings - Computers and Digital Techniques 145, 135–141 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Walsh, W.E., Tesauro, G., Kephart, J.O., Das, R.: Utility functions in autonomic systems. In: ICAC 2004. 1st International Conference on Autonomic Computing, New York, USA, 17-19 May 2004, pp. 70–77. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mattson, C.A., Messac, A.: Pareto frontier based concept selection under uncertainty, with visualization. Optimization and Engineering 6, 85–115 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Zanchettin, C., Ludermir, T.B.: The influence of different cost functions in global optimization techniques. In: SBRN 2006. Proc. 9th Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 17–31. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Grunske, L.: Transformational patterns for the improvement of safety properties in architectural specifications. In: VikingPLoP 2003. Proceedings of The Second Nordic Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, Bergen, Norway (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Saridakis, T.: A system of patterns for fault tolerance. In: Proceedings of the EuroPlop (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gokhale, S.S., Trivedi, K.S.: Reliability prediction and sensitivity analysis based on software architecture. In: ISSRE 2002. 13th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Annapolis, MD, USA, November 12-15, 2002, pp. 64–78. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ehrgott, M., Gandibleux, X.: A Survey and Annotated Bibliography of Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization. OR Spektrum 22, 425–460 (2000)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Reeves, C.R.: Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Grunske, L., Kaiser, B.: Automatic generation of analyzable failure propagation models from component-level failure annotations. In: QSIC 2005. 5th International Conference on Quality Software, Melbourne, September 19-20, 2005, pp. 117–123. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Papadopoulos, Y., Parker, D., Grante, C.: Automating the failure modes and effects analysis of safety critical systems. In: HASE 2004. Int. Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering, pp. 310–311. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bondarev, E., Chaudron, M.R.V., de Kock, E.A.: Exploring performance trade-offs of a jpeg decoder using the deepcompass framework. In: WOSP 2007. Proceedings of the 6th international workshop on Software and performance, pp. 153–163. ACM Press, New York, USA (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Bondarev, E., Chaudron, M.R.V., de With, P.H.N.: Compositional performance analysis of component-based systems on heterogeneous multiprocessor platforms. In: EUROMICRO 2006. Proceedings of the 32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 81–91. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  53. de Castro Guerra, P.A., Romanovsky, A.B., de Lemos, R.: Integrating COTS software components into dependable software architectures. In: ISORC 2003. 6th IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan, May 14-16, 2003, pp. 139–142. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gokhale, S.S.: Architecture-based software reliability analysis: Overview and limitations. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 4, 32–40 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rogério de Lemos Cristina Gacek Alexander Romanovsky

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grunske, L., Lindsay, P., Bondarev, E., Papadopoulos, Y., Parker, D. (2007). An Outline of an Architecture-Based Method for Optimizing Dependability Attributes of Software-Intensive Systems. In: de Lemos, R., Gacek, C., Romanovsky, A. (eds) Architecting Dependable Systems IV. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4615. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74035-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74035-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74033-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74035-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics