Topology-Preserving Mappings for Data Visualisation

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Enginee book series (LNCSE, volume 58)

We present a family of topology preserving mappings similar to the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) and the Generative Topographic Map (GTM). These techniques can be considered as a non-linear projection from input or data space to the output or latent space (usually 2D or 3D), plus a clustering technique, that updates the centres. A common frame based on the GTM structure can be used with different clustering techniques, giving new properties to the algorithms.

Thus we have the topographic product of experts (ToPoE) with the Product of Experts substituting the Mixture of Experts of the GTM, two versions of the Harmonic Topographic Mapping (HaToM) that utilise the K-Harmonic Means (KHM) clustering, and the faster Topographic Neural Gas (ToNeGas), with the inclusion of Neural Gas in the inner loop. We also present the Inverse-weighted K-means Topology-Preserving Map (IKToM), based on the same structure for non-linear projection, that makes use of a new clustering technique called The Inverse Weighted K-Means. We apply all the algorithms to a high dimensional dataset, and compare it as well with the Self-Organizing Map, in terms of visualisation, clustering and topology preservation.


Latent Space Data Space Best Match Unit Topology Preservation Alfa Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arsuaga-Uriarte, E. and Daz-Martn, F.: Topology preservation in SOM. Trans-actions On Engineering, Computing And Technology, 15, 1305-5313 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2. Barbakh, W., Crowe, M., and Fyfe, C.: A family of novel clustering algorithms. In: 7th international conference on intelligent data engineering and automated learning, IDEAL2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3. Barbakh, W. and Fyfe, C.: Performance functions and clustering algorithms. Computing and Information Systems, 10 (2), 2-8 (2006) ISSN 1352-9404.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bishop, C. M., Svensen, M., and Williams, C. K. I.: Gtm: The generative topo-graphic mapping. Neural Computation, 10 (1), 215-234 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5. Bishop, C. M., Svensen, M., and Williams, C. K. I.: Magnification Factors for the GTM Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the IEE 5th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Cambridge, U. K., 64-69P (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Friedman, J., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R.: Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. Annals of Statistics, 28, 337-374 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fyfe, C.: Two topographic maps for data visualization. Mining and Knowledge Discovery (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dyrskjot, L., Thykjaer, T., Kruhoffer, M. et al.: Identifying distinct classes of bladder carcinoma using microarrays. Nat Genetics 33 (1), 90-96 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9. Hamerly, G. and Elkan, C.: Alternatives to the k-means algorithm that find better clusterings. In: CIKM ’02: Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 600-607, New York, NY, USA, ACM Press (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hinton, G. E.: Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive diver-gence. Technical Report GCNU TR 2000-004, Gatsby Computational Neuro-science Unit, University College, London (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jacobs, R. A., Jordan, M. I., Nowlan, S. J., and Hinton, G. E.: Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation, 3, 79-87 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jordan, M. I. and Jacobs, R. A.: Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the em algorithm. Neural Computation, 6, 181-214 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kohonen, T.: Self-Organising Maps. Springer (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martinetz, T. M., Berkovich, S. G., and Schulten, K. J.: ‘neural-gas’ network for vector quantization and its application to time-series prediction. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks., 4 (4), 558-569 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15. Neural Networks Research Centre. Helsinki University of Technology. Som toolbox. www. cis. hut. fi/projects/somtoolbox.
  16. 16.
    Peña, M. and Fyfe, C.: Developments of the generalised harmonic topographic mapping. WSEAS Transactions On Computers, 4 (11), 1548-1555 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peña, M. and Fyfe, C.: Model-and data-driven harmonic topographic maps. WSEAS Transactions On Computers, 4 (9), 1033-1044, (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18. Peña, M. and Fyfe, C.: The topographic neural gas. In: 7th International Con-ference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, IDEAL06., pages 241-249 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tipping, M. E.: Topographic Mappings and Feed-Forward Neural Networks. PhD thesis, The University of Aston in Birmingham (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, B.: Generalized k-harmonic means -boosting in unsupervised learning. Technical Report HPL-2000-137, HP Laboratories, Palo Alto, October (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21. Zhang, B.: Generalized k-harmonic means-dynamic weighting of data in un-supervised learning. In: First SIAM international Conference on Data Mining (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, B., Hsu, M., and Dayal, U.: K-harmonic means -a data clustering algo-rithm. Technical Report HPL-1999-124, HP Laboratories, Palo Alto, October (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Computational Intelligence Research UnitThe University of PaisleyScotland, PaisleyUK

Personalised recommendations