Skip to main content

Group Decision Making: From Consistency to Consensus

  • Conference paper
Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence (MDAI 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4617))

Abstract

In group decision making (GDM) processes, prior to the selection of the best alternative(s), it would be desirable that experts achieve a high degree of consensus or agreement between them. Due to the complexity of most decision making problems, individuals’ preferences may not satisfy formal properties. Consistency is one of such properties, and it is associated with the transitivity property. Obviously, when carrying out a rational decision making, consistent information, i.e. information which does not imply any kind of contradiction, is more appropriate than information containing some contradictions. Therefore, in a GDM process, consistency should also be sought after.

In this paper we present a consensus model for GDM problems that proceeds from consistency to consensus. This model includes a novel consistency reaching module based on consistency measures. In particular, the model generates advice on how experts should change their preferences in order to reach a solution with high consistency and consensus degrees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 97(1), 33–48 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A Note on the Internal Consistency of Various Preference Representations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 131(1), 75–78 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Fishburn, P.C.: The Theory of Social Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fishburn, P.C.: Utility Theory for Decision Making. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79, 73–87 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making. International Journal approximate Reasoning 16, 309–334 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 32(3), 394–402 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F., Luque, M.: Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research 154(1), 98–109 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrera-Viedma, E., Martínez, L., Mata, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multi-granular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 13(5), 644–658 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrera-Viedma, E., Mata, F., Martínez, L., Chiclana, F., Pérez, L.G.: Measurements of consensus in multi-granular linguistic group decision making. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y. (eds.) MDAI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3131, pp. 194–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herrera-Viedma, E., Mata, F., Martínez, L., Pérez, L.G.: An adaptive module for the consensus reaching process in group decision making problems. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Miyamoto, S. (eds.) MDAI 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3558, pp. 89–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kacprzyk, J.: Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 18, 105–118 (1986)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma, J., Fan, Z.-P., Jiang, Y.-P., Mao, J.Y., Ma, L.: A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157, 20–33 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Roubens, M.: Fuzzy sets and decision analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 90, 199–206 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanino, T.: Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 12, 117–131 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Vicenç Torra Yasuo Narukawa Yuji Yoshida

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chiclana, F., Mata, F., Alonso, S., Herrera-Viedma, E., Martínez, L. (2007). Group Decision Making: From Consistency to Consensus. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Yoshida, Y. (eds) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4617. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73729-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73729-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73728-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73729-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics