Skip to main content

Soziale Bindungen von Usern an Web 2.0-Angebote

  • Chapter
Web 2.0

Auszug

Web 2.0 ist durch die wachsende Abhängigkeit des wirtschaftlichen Erfolgs der Betreiber von privaten Online-Aktivitäten gekennzeichnet. My-Space, YouTube und ähnliche Portale könnten nicht ohne den Content existieren, der von Usern kostenlos zur Verfügung gestellt wird. Selbst Second Life ist von der großen Zahl von Usern abhängig, die (wenn auch nicht in jedem Fall unentgeltlich) an der Entwicklung des Contents mitarbeiten. Der Erfolg vieler Web 2.0-Produkte, hängt also zentral von der aktiven Bearbeitung der Inhalte einer Webplattform durch die User ab. Aufgrund dieser zentralen Rolle der User widmet sich dieser Betrag der Bindung von Usern an ein Internetangebot, also der virtuellen Gemeinschaft, auf der ein Web 2.0-Produkt aufbaut.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Baumeister RF, Leary MR (1995) The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117, S 497–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, S 475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown R (2000) Social Identity Theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology 30, S 745–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia UM, Bagozzi AP, Pearo LK (2004) A social influence model of consumer participation in network and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21, S 241–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux K (1996) Social identification. In: Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW (Hrsg) Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. Guilford Press, New York, S 777–798

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux K, Reid A, Mizrahi K, Cotting D (1999) Connecting the person to the social: The functions of social identification. In: Tyler TR, Kramer RM, John OP (Hrsg) The psychology of the social self. Erlbaum, London, S 91–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins ET (1987) Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review 94, S 319–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg MA (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg MA (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. In Stroebe W, Hewstone M (Hrsg) European review of social psychology, Vol. 11. Wiley, Chichester, S 223–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg MA, Turner JC (1985). Interpersonal attraction, social identity and psychological group formation. European Journal of Social Psychology 15, S 51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas KJ, Boos M, Sassenberg K (2002) Unsubscribe pleeezz!!! Management and training of media competence in computer-mediated communication. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 5, S 315–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce E, Kraut RE (2006). Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, S 723–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut R, Mukhopadhyay T, Szczypula J, Kiesler S, Scherlis B (1999) Information and communication: Alternative uses of the internet in households. Information Systems Research 10, S 287–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling K, Beenen G, Ludford P, Wang X, Chang K, Li X, Cosley D, Frankowski D, Terveen L, Rashid AM, Resnick P, Kraut R (2005) Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10, S 212–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott AJ, Lott BE (1961) Group cohesiveness, communication level and conformity. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 62, S 408–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna KYA, Bargh JA (1998). Coming out in the age of the internet: Identity ‘demarginalization’ through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75, S 681–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes PJ (1987) The salience of social categories. In: Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (Hrsg) Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Blackwell, New York, S 117–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Otten S (2002) ‘Me and us’ or ‘us and them’? The self as a heuristic for defining minimal ingroups. In: Stroebe W, Hewstone M (Hrsg) European review of social psychology Vol. 13. Psychology Press, Hove, S 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Postmes T, Jetten J (Hrsg) (2006) Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Postmes T, Spears R (2000) Refining the cognitive redefinition of the group: Deindividuation effects in common bond vs. common identity groups. In: Postmes T, Spears R, Lea M, Reicher S (Hrsg) SIDE effects centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups. KNAW, Amsterdam, S 63–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Postmes T, Spears R, Lee AT, Novak RJ (2005) Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89, S 747–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice DA, Miller DT, Lightdale JR (1994) Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20, S 484–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher SD, Spears R, Postmes T (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology 6, S 161–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner KH, Marcus B, Machilek F, Schütz A (2005) Selbstdarstellung und Persönlichkeit auf privaten Homepages. In: Renner KH, Schütz A, Machilek F, (Hrsg) Internet und Persönlichkeit. Hogrefe, Göttingen, S 189–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Riketta M (2005) Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior 66, S 358–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult CE, Van Lange PAM (2003) Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology 54, S 351–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K (2002) Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative Behavior in on-Topic and off-Topic chats. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6, S 27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K (2004) Formen und Bedeutung elektronischer Kommunikation in Unternehmen. In: Hertel G, Konradt U (Hrsg) Electronic Human Ressource im Inter-und Intranet. Hogrefe, Göttingen, S 92–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K, Boos M (2003). Attitude change in computer-mediated communication: Effects of anonymity and category norms. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 6, S 405–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K, Jonas KJ (2007) Attitude change and social influence on the net. In: Joinson A, McKenna KA, Postmes T, Reips UD (Hrsg) Oxford Handbook: Psychology of the Internet. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K, Postmes T (2002) Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology 41, S 463–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K, Boos M, Klapproth F (2001) Wissen und Glaubwürdigkeit als zentrale Merkmale von Experten: Der Einfluss von Expertise auf den Informationsaustausch in computervermittelter Kommunikation. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 32, S 45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K, Boos M, Rabung S (2005) Attitude change in face to face and computer-mediated communication: Private self-awareness as mediator and moderator. European Journal of Social Psychology 35, S 361–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K, Wodzicki K, Jörke S (2007b) The impact of interpersonal and ingroup influence on knowledge exchange. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K, Boos M, Postmes T, Reips UD (2003) Studying the Internet: A challenge for modern psychology (Editorial — Special Issue). Swiss Journal of Psychology 62, S 75–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassenberg K, Jonas KJ, Shah JY, Brazy PC (2007a) Regulatory fit of the ingroup: The impact of group power and regulatory focus on implicit intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92, S 249–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers D, Spears R, Doosje B, Manstead ASR (2007) The social functions of ingroup bias: Creating, confirming, or changing social reality. European Review of Social Psychology 17, S 359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin WG, Worchel S (Hrsg) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, S 33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 1, S 149–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (Hrsg) (1987) Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Blackwell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Utz S (2003) Social identification and interpersonal attraction in MUDs. Swiss Journal of Psychology 62, S 91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utz S, Sassenberg K (2001) Attachment to a virtual seminar: The role of experience, motives and fulfillment of expectations. In: Reips UD, Bosnjak M (Hrsg) Dimensions of Internet Science. Pabst, Lengerich, S 323–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Utz S, Sassenberg K (2002) Distributive justice in common-bond and common-identity groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 5, S 151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther JB (1992) Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Communication Research 19, S 52–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sassenberg, K. (2008). Soziale Bindungen von Usern an Web 2.0-Angebote. In: Hass, B.H., Walsh, G., Kilian, T. (eds) Web 2.0. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73701-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73701-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73700-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73701-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics