Abstract
Polymorphism has become a common way of designing short and reusable programs by abstracting generic definitions from type-specific ones. Such a convenience is valuable in logic as well, because it unburdens the specifier from writing redundant declarations of logical symbols. However, top shelf automated theorem provers such as Simplify, Yices or other SMT-LIB ones do not handle polymorphism. To this end, we present efficient reductions of polymorphism in both unsorted and many-sorted first order logics. For each encoding, we show that the formulas and their encoded counterparts are logically equivalent in the context of automated theorem proving. The efficiency keynote is to disturb the prover as little as possible, especially the internal decision procedures used for special sorts, e.g. integer linear arithmetic, to which we apply a special treatment. The corresponding implementations are presented in the framework of the Why/Caduceus toolkit.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Nipkow, T., Paulson, L.C., Wenzel, M.: Isabelle/HOL - A Proof Assistant for Higher-Order Logic. LNCS, vol. 2283. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Bertot, Y., Castéran, P.: Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development. In: Coq’Art: the Calculus of Inductive Constructions, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Detlefs, D., Nelson, G., Saxe, J.B.: Simplify: a Theorem Prover for Program Checking. J. ACM 52(3), 365–473 (2005)
Déharbe, D., Ranise, S.: BDD-driven First-Order Satisfiability Procedures (extended version). Technical Report 4630, LORIA (2002)
Ranise, S., Tinelli, C.: The Satisfiability Modulo Theories Library (SMT-LIB) (2006), http://www.SMT-LIB.org
Dutertre, B., de Moura, L.: The YICES SMT Solver (2006), avaliable at http://yices.csl.sri.com/tool-paper.pdf
Barrett, C.W., Berezin, S.: CVC Lite: A New Implementation of the Cooperating Validity Checker Category B. In: Alur, R., Peled, D.A. (eds.) CAV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3114, pp. 515–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Couchot, J.F., Lescuyer, S.: Handling Polymorphism in Automated Deduction (2007), Available at http://lri.fr/~couchot/ftp/publis/CL07t.ps
Enderton, H.B.: A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. Ac. Press, Inc. (1972)
Armando, A., Ranise, S., Rusinowitch, M.: A Rewriting Approach to Satisfiability Procedures. Journal of Information and computation 183, 140–164 (2003)
Lescuyer, S.: Codage de la logique du premier ordre polymorphe multi-sortée dans la logique sans sortes. Master’s thesis (in english), pp. 28–58 (2006)
Pugh, W.: The Omega Test: a fast and practical integer programming algorithm for dependence analysis. Communications of the ACM 35(8), 102–114 (1992)
Ayache, N., Filliâtre, J.C.: Combining the Coq Proof Assistant with First-Order Decision Procedures. Unpublished (March 2006)
Filliâtre, J.C.: Why: a multi-language multi-prover verification tool. Research Report 1366, LRI, Université Paris Sud (March 2003)
Filliâtre, J.C., Marché, C.: Multi-Prover Verification of C Programs. In: Davies, J., Schulte, W., Barnett, M. (eds.) ICFEM 2004. LNCS, vol. 3308, pp. 15–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Dahn, I.: Interpretation of a mizar-like logic in first-order logic. In: Selected Papers from Automated Deduction in Classical and Non-Classical Logics, pp. 137–151. Springer, London (2000)
Schmitt, S., Lorigo, L., Kreitz, C., Nogin, A.: Jprover: Integrating connection-based theorem proving into interactive proof assistants. In: Goré, R.P., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2083, pp. 421–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Rudnicki, P.: An overview of the Mizar project. In: Workshop on Types for Proofs and Programs, pp. 311–330 (1992)
Allen, S.F., Constable, R.L., Eaton, R., Kreitz, C., Lorigo, L.: The nuprl open logical environment. In: McAllester, D. (ed.) Automated Deduction - CADE-17. LNCS, vol. 1831, pp. 170–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Hurd, J.: First-Order Proof Tactics in Higher-Order Logic Theorem Provers. Technical Report NASA/CP-2003-212448, NASA (2003)
Meng, J., Paulson, L.C.: Translating Higher-Order Problems to First-Order Clauses. In: ESCoR (CEUR Workshop Proceedings), vol. 192, pp. 70–80 (2006)
Meng, J., Quigley, C., Paulson, L.C.: Automation for interactive proof: first prototype. Inf. Comput. 204(10), 1575–1596 (2006)
Schulz, S.: System Description: E 0.81. In: Basin, D., Rusinowitch, M. (eds.) IJCAR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3097, pp. 223–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Riazanov, A., Voronkov, A.: The design and Implementation of VAMPIRE. AI Commun. 15(2-3), 91–110 (2002)
Paulson, L.C.: A generic tableau prover and its integration with Isabelle. J. UCS: Journal of Universal Computer Science 5(3), 73 (1999)
Bouillaguet, C., Kuncak, V., Wies, T., Zee, K., Rinard, M.: Using first-order theorem provers in the Jahob data structure verification system. In: Cook, B., Podelski, A. (eds.) VMCAI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4349, pp. 74–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Couchot, JF., Lescuyer, S. (2007). Handling Polymorphism in Automated Deduction. In: Pfenning, F. (eds) Automated Deduction – CADE-21. CADE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4603. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73595-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73595-3_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73594-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73595-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)