Skip to main content

A Lower Bound on Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Communication Complexity

  • Conference paper
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4596))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We prove a general lower bound on the bounded-error entanglement-assisted quantum communication complexity of Boolean functions. The bound is based on the concept that any classical or quantum protocol to evaluate a function on distributed inputs can be turned into a quantum communication protocol. As an application of this bound, we give a very simple proof of the statement that almost all Boolean functions on n + n bits have communication complexity linear in n, even in the presence of unlimited entanglement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaronson, S., Ambainis, A.: Quantum search of spatial regions. Theory of Computing 1, 47–79 (2005) quant-ph/0303041

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Ambainis, A., Schulman, L.J., Ta-Shma, A., Vazirani, U., Wigderson, A.: The quantum communication complexity of sampling. SIAM J. Comput. 32, 1570–1585 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Alon, N., Spencer, J.: The probabilistic method. Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization. Wiley, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Buhrman, H., deWolf, R.: Communication complexity lower bounds by polynomials. In: Proc. CCC 2001, pp. 120–130 (2001) cs.CC/9910010

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cleve, R., van Dam, W., Nielsen, M., Tapp, A.: Quantum entanglement and the communication complexity of the inner product function. In: Selected papers from the First NASA International Conference on Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications, pp.61–74, February 17-20 (1998) quant-ph/9708019

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fannes, M.: A continuity property of the entropy density for spin lattice systems. Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 291–294 (1973)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. van Dam, W., Hayden, P.: Renyi-entropic bounds on quantum communication (2002) quant-ph/0204093

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gavinsky, D., Kempe, J., de Wolf, R.: Strengths and weaknesses of quantum fingerprinting. In: Proc. CCC 2006, pp. 288–298 (2006) quant-ph/0603173

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hausladen, P., Jozsa, R., Schumacher, B., Westmoreland, M., Wootters, W.: Classical information capacity of a quantum channel. Phys. Rev. A 54(3), 1869–1876 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Holevo, A.S.: Bounds for the quantity of information transmittable by a quantum communications channel. Problemy Peredachi Informatsii 9(3), 3–11 (1973) English translation Problems of Information Transmission 9, 177–183 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.: Matrix analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jozsa, R., Schlienz, J.: Distinguishability of states and von Neumann entropy. Phys. Rev. A 62 012301 (2000) quant-ph/9911009

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klauck, H.: Lower bounds for quantum communication complexity. In: Proc. FOCS 2001, pp. 288–297 (2001) quant-ph/0106160

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kremer, I.: Quantum communication. Master’s thesis, Hebrew University (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kushilevitz, E., Nisan, N.: Communication complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Linial, N., Shraibman, A.: Learning complexity vs. communication complexity. Manuscript (2006), http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~nati/PAPERS/lcc.pdf

  17. Linial, N., Shraibman, A.: Lower bounds in communication complexity based on factorization norms. In: Proc. STOC 2007 (to appear, 2007), http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~nati/PAPERS/quantcc.pdf

  18. Nayak, A., Salzman, J.: On communication over an entanglement-assisted quantum channel. In: Proc. STOC 2002, pp. 698–704 (2002) quant-ph/0206122

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nielsen, M.A.: Quantum information theory. PhD thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque (1998) quant-ph/0011036

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Raz, R.: Exponential separation of quantum and classical communication complexity, In: Proc. STOC 1999, pp. 358–367 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Razborov, A.A.: Quantum communication complexity of symmetric predicates. Izvestiya of the Russian Academy of Science 67, 159–176 (2003) quant-ph/ 0204025

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Rényi, A.: Probability theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  24. de Wolf, R.: Quantum communication and complexity. Theoretical Computer Science 287(1), 337–353 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Yao, A.: Some complexity questions related to distributive computing. In: Proc. STOC 1979, pp. 209–213 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Lars Arge Christian Cachin Tomasz Jurdziński Andrzej Tarlecki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Montanaro, A., Winter, A. (2007). A Lower Bound on Entanglement-Assisted Quantum Communication Complexity. In: Arge, L., Cachin, C., Jurdziński, T., Tarlecki, A. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4596. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73420-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73420-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73419-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73420-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics