TCP NJ+ for Wireless HCI

  • Jungrae Kim
  • Jahwan Koo
  • Hyunseung Choo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4558)


TCP application in wireless HCI environments communicates to each other frequently through wireless networks. Therefore, it is important that significant TCP performance is guaranteed in wireless network. TCP New Jersey, known as the best existing scheme in terms of goodput in wireless networks, improves wireless TCP performance using the available bandwidth estimation at the sender and the congestion warning at intermediate routers. Although TCP New Jersey achieves 17% and 85% improvements in goodput over TCP Westwood and TCP Reno, respectively, we further improve TCP New Jersey by exploring enhanced available bandwidth estimation and suitable error recovery mechanism. Hence, we propose TCP NJ+. It outperforms other TCP variants by 19% to 104% in terms of goodput even when the network is in bi-directional congestion. Hence TCP NJ+ can provide the best services to user in wireless HCI environments.


TCP wireless HCI Congestion Control TCP New Jersey 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Postel, J.: Transmission control protocol. RFC 793 (1981)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allman, M., Paxson, V., Stevens, W.: TCP Congestion control. RFC 2581 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tian, Y., Xu, K., Ansari, N.: TCP in wireless environments: problems and solutions. IEEE Radio Communications 43, 27–32 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steve, L.: Understanding mobile Human-Computer Interactions. Butterworth-Heinemann (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stevens, W.: TCP slow start, congestion avoidance, fast retransmit and fast recovery algorithms. RFC 2001 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu, K., Tian, Y., Ansari, N.: TCP-Jersey for wireless IP communications. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications 22, 747–756 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xu, K., Tian, Y., Ansari, N.: Improving TCP performance in integrated wireless communications networks. Computer Networks 47, 219–237 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Casetti, C., Gerla, M., Mascolo, S., Sanadidi, M.Y., Wang, R.: TCP Westwood: bandwidth estimation for enhanced transport over wireless links. ACM/IEEE MobiCom, pp.287–297 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Floyd, S.: TCP and explicit congestion notification. ACM Computer Communications Review 24, 10–23 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jacobson, V., Braden, R., Borman, D.: TCP extensions for high performance. RFC 1323 (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    UCB/LBNL/VINT Network Simulator [Online]. Avilable:
  12. 12.
    Cen, S., Cosman, P.C., Voelker, G.M.: End-to-end differentiation of congestion and wireless losses. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 11, 703–717 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jungrae Kim
    • 1
  • Jahwan Koo
    • 1
  • Hyunseung Choo
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, SuwonKorea

Personalised recommendations