Impact of Interactive Learning on Knowledge Retention

  • Mohamed Ibrahim
  • Osama Al-Shara
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4558)

Abstract

There is amble evidence that supports true interactivity, both in the interface and in the presentation methodology, will further enhance learning and knowledge retention among students. The real challenge is how to implement it, measure and evaluate this outcome. This paper presents findings that look into the efficacy of the combination of virtual environments and interactive teaching techniques in enhancing learning and increasing the knowledge retention level of students.It is now widely accepted that the conventional way of lecturing students has certain limitations. E-learning and the use of ICT, interactive tools in the education field has proven to be effective in assisting the teaching and learning experience. It has been observed that the one way communication method of lecturing with limited or no opportunity for feedback from students and audiences in general has a major impact on their attention span and the retention level. There are issues related to the establishment and implementation of interactive learning tools as an aid for teaching and especially in continuous evaluation of students’ achievements. We point out that it is not only the ’teaching’ tasks that are impacted by the use of ICT but also current methods of evaluation including written examinations which have proven to be time consuming and inaccurate reflection of students’ achievements. The introduction of interactive learning and evaluation has several advantages and this paper will give a convincing support to the fact that the advantages are more than the fact that it makesthe teaching and evaluation process easy, simple and rapid. Educators should not fail to adapt and respond to the needs of 21st century bust and multi-tasking students for innovative learning methods, i.e. interactive learning. The role of education institutions and educators in the future will become demand-driven; to satisfy technically sophisticated student clients. The paper recommends that we should not ignore the use of interactive technology used as it should be, as a tool, to enhance sound pedagogical methods, however, we should also be able to measure its contribution in enhancing teaching and learning. It is pertinent to synthesize a framework that encompasses ways to compliment existing methods of teaching with interactive learning.

Keywords

interactivity simulation elearning pedagogy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barker, P.: Designing interactive learning. In: de Jong, T., Sarti, L. (eds.) Design and Production of Multimedia and Simulation-based Learning Material, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barton, R.: IT in which way now? London: Routledge.Practical work. Assessing and increasing the value added. In: Wellington, J. (ed.) Practical work in school. Science (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berge, Z.L.: Interaction in post-secondary web-based learning. Educational Technology 39(1), 5–11 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    British Educational Communications and Technology agency (Becta) The importance of activities in the teaching of science: a constructivist perspective on teaching science (24/1/2001), http://www.owu.edu/~mggrote/pp/construct/f-construct.html
  5. 5.
    D’Alessandro, M.P., Galvin, J.R., Erkonen, W.E., Albanese, M.A., Michaelsen, V.E., Huntley, J.S., McBurney, R.M., Easley, G.: The instructional effectiveness of radiology multimedia textbook (hyperlung) versus a standard lecture. Investigative Radiology 28(7), 643–648 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Driscoll, M.: Defining Internet-based and web-based training. Performance Improvement 36(4), 5–9Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hotle, F.: Technology and the science class: going beyond the walls of the disk Drive. In: Cannings, T. R., Finkel, L. (eds.) The technology age classroom. Wilsonville: Franklin, Breddle and Associates (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoyt, J.: Does the Delivery Method Matter? Comparing Technologically Delivered Distance Education with On-Campus Instruction (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lander, D.: Online learning; ways to make tasks interactive. Ultibase, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leask, M., Pachler, N.: Learning to teach using ICT in the secondary school. Routledge, London (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mesher, D.: Designing interactivities for Internet learning. Syllabus 12(7) (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller, R.L: Learning Benefits of Interactive Technologies. Multimedia and Videodisc Monitor, 14 (February 1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Monteith, M.: Information technology for learning enhancement. Exeter: Sweets and Zeitlinger Publishers (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pool, T.S., Blanchard, S.M., Hale, S.A.: From over the Internet: Users discuss a new direction for learning. Tech. Trends 40(1), 24–28 (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Price, R.V.: A model for the on-line college-level guided study course. Tech. Trends 41(4), 39–43 (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaw, R.E., Effken, J.A., Fajen, B.R., Garrett, S.R., Morris, A.: An ecological approach to the on-line assessment of problem-solving paths: Principles and applications. Instructional Science 25, 151–166 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sherry, L.: Supporting a networked community of learners. Tech. Trends (October 28-32, 1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., Hanson, D.: Theory and distance education: A new discussion. In: Gillespie, K.H. (ed.) The Impact of Technology on Faculty Development, Life and Work, pp. 60–75, Jossey Bass, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smeaton, A.F., Keogh, G.: An analysis of the use of virtual delivery of undergraduate lectures. Computers & Education 32(1), 83–94 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Watson, J.B., Rossett, A.: Guiding the independent learner in web-based training. Educational Technology 39(3), 27–36 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Whalen, T., Wright, D.: Methodology for cost-benefit analysis of web-based tele-learning: Case study of the bell online institute. The American Journal of Distance Education 13(1), 24–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Ibrahim
    • 1
  • Osama Al-Shara
    • 1
  1. 1.ADWC, Higher Colleges of Technology, PO Box 41012, Abu Dhabi, UAE 

Personalised recommendations