Advertisement

Evaluating the Need for Display-Specific and Device-Specific 3D Interaction Techniques

  • Doug A. Bowman
  • Brian Badillo
  • Dhruv Manek
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4563)

Abstract

There are many visual display devices and input devices available to designers of immersive virtual environment (VE) applications. Most 3D interaction techniques, however, were designed using a particular combination of devices. The effects of migrating these techniques to different displays and input devices are not known. In this paper, we report on a series of studies designed to determine these effects. The studies show that while 3D interaction techniques are quite robust under some conditions, migration to different displays and input devices can cause serious usability problems in others. This implies that display-specific and/or device-specific versions of these techniques are necessary. In addition to the studies, we describe our display- and device-specific designs for two common 3D manipulation techniques.

Keywords

Virtual environments display devices input devices 3D interaction techniques migration specificity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sherman, W., Craig, A.: Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowman, D., et al.: 3D User Interfaces: Theory & Practice. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poupyrev, I., et al.: The Go-Go Interaction Technique: Non-linear Mapping for Direct Manipulation in VR. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowman, D., et al.: New Directions in 3D User Interfaces. International Journal of Virtual Reality 5(2), 3–14 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, J., Bowman, D.: Effectiveness of Cloning Techniques for Architectural Virtual Environments. IEEE Virtual Reality (2006) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manek, D.: Effects of Visual Displays on 3D Interaction in Virtual Environments. M.S. Thesis, Dept. of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brooks, F.: What’s Real About Virtual Reality? IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 19(6), 16–27 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lantz, E.: The Future of Virtual Reality: Head Mounted Displays versus Spatially Immersive Displays. ACM Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arthur, K.: Effects of Field of View on Performance with Head-Mounted Displays. Dept. of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kjeldskov, J.: Combining Interaction Techniques and Display Types for Virtual Reality. In: OzCHI 2001. Perth, Australia (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bowman, D., et al.: Empirical Comparison of Human Behavior and Performance with Different Display Devices for Virtual Environments. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhai, S., Milgram, P.: Human Performance Evaluation of Manipulation Schemes in Virtual Environments. Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (1993)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hinckley, K., et al.: Usability Analysis of 3D Rotation Techniques. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    LaViola, J., et al.: Hands-Free Multi-Scale Navigation in Virtual Environments. In: ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stoakley, R., Conway, M., Pausch, R.: Virtual Reality on a WIM: Interactive Worlds in Miniature. CHI: Human Factors in Computing Systems (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D., DeFanti, T.: Surround-Screen Projection-Based Virtual Reality: The Design and Implementation of the CAVE. ACM SIGGRAPH (1993)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bowman, D., et al.: Novel Uses of Pinch Gloves for Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques. Virtual Reality 6(3), 122–129 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bowman, D., Hodges, L.: An Evaluation of Techniques for Grabbing and Manipulating Remote Objects in Immersive Virtual Environments. ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pierce, J., Stearns, B., Pausch, R.: Voodoo Dolls: Seamless Interaction at Multiple Scales in Virtual Environments. In: ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wingrave, C., Bowman, D.: CHASM: Bridging Description and Implementation of 3D Interfaces. Workshop on New Directions in 3D User Interfaces (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kessler, G., Bowman, D., Hodges, L.: The Simple Virtual Environment Library: An Extensible Framework for Building VE Applications. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9(2), 187–208 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kelso, J., et al.: DIVERSE: A Framework for Building Extensible and Reconfigurable Device Independent Virtual Environments. IEEE Virtual Reality (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Doug A. Bowman
    • 1
  • Brian Badillo
    • 1
  • Dhruv Manek
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Human-Computer Interaction and Department of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, 660 McBryde Hall, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061USA

Personalised recommendations